Theorem sb5 2300

Description: Alternate definition of substitution when variables are disjoint. Similar to Theorem 6.1 of [Quine] p. 40. The implication "to the right" is sb1v 2110 and even needs no disjoint variable condition, see sb1 2499. Theorem sb5f 2519 replaces the disjoint variable condition with a nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 4-Sep-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb5	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sb5

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb6 2108	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
2		sbalex 2267	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
3	1, 2	bitr4i 280	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398  ∀wal 1548  ∃wex 1789  [wsb 2080

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1805  ax-4 1819  ax-5 1920  ax-6 1977  ax-7 2018  ax-10 2165  ax-12 2202

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1790  df-nf 1794  df-sb 2081

This theorem is referenced by:  2sb5  2302  sb7f  2546  clelab  2896  sbc2or  3744  sbc5ALT  3764  bj-axseprep  37497