Theorem sb5 2273

Description: Alternate definition of substitution when variables are disjoint. Similar to Theorem 6.1 of [Quine] p. 40. The implication "to the right" is sb1v 2092 and even needs no disjoint variable condition, see sb1 2492. Theorem sb5f 2516 replaces the disjoint variable condition with a non-freeness hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) Shorten sb56 2274. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 4-Sep-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb5	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sb5

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfs1v 2157	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
2		sbequ12 2250	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
3	1, 2	equsexv 2266	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4	3	bicomi 227	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399  ∃wex 1781  [wsb 2069

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-10 2142  ax-12 2175

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070

This theorem is referenced by:  sb56  2274  2sb5  2278  sb7f  2545  sbc2or  3729  sbc5  3748