Theorem sbn 2280

Description: Negation inside and outside of substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Apr-2018.) Revise df-sb 2069. (Revised by BJ, 25-Dec-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbn	⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ [𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑)

Proof of Theorem sbn

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-sb 2069	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ 𝜑)))
2		alinexa 1846	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
3	2	imbi2i 335	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝑡 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑦 = 𝑡 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)))
4	3	albii 1823	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)))
5		alinexa 1846	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)))
6		dfsb7 2279	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)))
7	5, 6	xchbinxr 334	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ¬ [𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑)
8	1, 4, 7	3bitri 296	1 ⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ [𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1537  ∃wex 1783  [wsb 2068

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-10 2139  ax-12 2173

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069

This theorem is referenced by:  sbex  2281  sbi2  2302  sbor  2307  sbcng  3761  difab  4231  wl-sb8et  35635  pm13.196a  41921  ichn  44796