Theorem difrab0eq 4464

Description: If the difference between the restricting class of a restricted class abstraction and the restricted class abstraction is empty, the restricting class is equal to this restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
difrab0eq	⊢ ((𝑉 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) = ∅ ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑})

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑉

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem difrab0eq

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssdif0 4358	. 2 ⊢ (𝑉 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) = ∅)
2		ssrabeq 4077	. 2 ⊢ (𝑉 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑})
3	1, 2	bitr3i 277	1 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) = ∅ ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   = wceq 1533  {crab 3426   ∖ cdif 3940   ⊆ wss 3943  ∅c0 4317

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-ext 2697

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-sb 2060  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-rab 3427  df-v 3470  df-dif 3946  df-in 3950  df-ss 3960  df-nul 4318

This theorem is referenced by:  frgrregorufr0  30086