Theorem difrab0eq 4426

Description: If the difference between the restricting class of a restricted class abstraction and the restricted class abstraction is empty, the restricting class is equal to this restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
difrab0eq	⊢ ((𝑉 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) = ∅ ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑})

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑉

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem difrab0eq

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssdif0 4321	. 2 ⊢ (𝑉 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) = ∅)
2		ssrabeq 4039	. 2 ⊢ (𝑉 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑})
3	1, 2	bitr3i 279	1 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) = ∅ ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   = wceq 1562  {crab 3416   ∖ cdif 3903   ⊆ wss 3906  ∅c0 4287

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2736

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-sb 2093  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-dif 3909  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288

This theorem is referenced by:  frgrregorufr0  30528