| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 45 of 501) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30976) |
(30977-32499) |
(32500-50086) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | npss0 4401 | No set is a proper subset of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ⊊ ∅ | ||
| Theorem | pssv 4402 | Any non-universal class is a proper subclass of the universal class. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ V ↔ ¬ 𝐴 = V) | ||
| Theorem | disj 4403* | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint (have no members in common). (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) Avoid ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163, ax-12 2185. (Revised by GG, 28-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | disjr 4404* | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | disj1 4405* | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint (have no members in common). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | reldisj 4406 | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint, using the complement of 𝐵 relative to a universe 𝐶. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) Avoid ax-12 2185. (Revised by GG, 28-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | disj3 4407 | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | disjne 4408 | Members of disjoint sets are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | disjeq0 4409 | Two disjoint sets are equal iff both are empty. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | disjel 4410 | A set can't belong to both members of disjoint classes. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | disj2 4411 | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ (V ∖ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | disj4 4412 | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊊ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ssdisj 4413 | Intersection with a subclass of a disjoint class. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | disjpss 4414 | A class is a proper subset of its union with a disjoint nonempty class. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | undisj1 4415 | The union of disjoint classes is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅ ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | undisj2 4416 | The union of disjoint classes is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ssindif0 4417 | Subclass expressed in terms of intersection with difference from the universal class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (V ∖ 𝐵)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | inelcm 4418 | The intersection of classes with a common member is nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | minel 4419 | A minimum element of a class has no elements in common with the class. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | undif4 4420 | Distribute union over difference. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅ → (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | disjssun 4421 | Subset relation for disjoint classes. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | vdif0 4422 | Universal class equality in terms of empty difference. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = V ↔ (V ∖ 𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | difrab0eq 4423* | If the difference between the restricting class of a restricted class abstraction and the restricted class abstraction is empty, the restricting class is equal to this restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑉 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) = ∅ ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | pssnel 4424* | A proper subclass has a member in one argument that's not in both. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | disjdif 4425 | A class and its relative complement are disjoint. Theorem 38 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | disjdifr 4426 | A class and its relative complement are disjoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | difin0 4427 | The difference of a class from its intersection is empty. Theorem 37 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐵) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | unvdif 4428 | The union of a class and its complement is the universe. Theorem 5.1(5) of [Stoll] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (V ∖ 𝐴)) = V | ||
| Theorem | undif1 4429 | Absorption of difference by union. This decomposes a union into two disjoint classes (see disjdif 4425). Theorem 35 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undif2 4430 | Absorption of difference by union. This decomposes a union into two disjoint classes (see disjdif 4425). Part of proof of Corollary 6K of [Enderton] p. 144. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undifabs 4431 | Absorption of difference by union. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | inundif 4432 | The intersection and class difference of a class with another class unite to give the original class. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 5-Jun-2009.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | disjdif2 4433 | The difference of a class and a class disjoint from it is the original class. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | difun2 4434 | Absorption of union by difference. Theorem 36 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undif 4435 | Union of complementary parts into whole. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undifr 4436 | Union of complementary parts into whole. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Nov-2023.) (Proof shortened by SN, 11-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∪ 𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undifrOLD 4437 | Obsolete version of undifr 4436 as of 11-Mar-2025. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∪ 𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undif5 4438 | An equality involving class union and class difference. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ssdifin0 4439 | A subset of a difference does not intersect the subtrahend. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 1-Sep-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ssdifeq0 4440 | A class is a subclass of itself subtracted from another iff it is the empty set. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ssundif 4441 | A condition equivalent to inclusion in the union of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | difcom 4442 | Swap the arguments of a class difference. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pssdifcom1 4443 | Two ways to express overlapping subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → ((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵) ⊊ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pssdifcom2 4444 | Two ways to express non-covering pairs of subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐵 ⊊ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | difdifdir 4445 | Distributive law for class difference. Exercise 4.8 of [Stoll] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∖ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | uneqdifeq 4446 | Two ways to say that 𝐴 and 𝐵 partition 𝐶 (when 𝐴 and 𝐵 don't overlap and 𝐴 is a part of 𝐶). (Contributed by FL, 17-Nov-2008.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | raldifeq 4447* | Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | rzal 4448* | Vacuous quantification is always true. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) Avoid df-clel 2812, ax-8 2116. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rzalALT 4449* | Alternate proof of rzal 4448. Shorter, but requiring df-clel 2812, ax-8 2116. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rexn0 4450* | Restricted existential quantification implies its restriction is nonempty. (Contributed by Szymon Jaroszewicz, 3-Apr-2007.) Avoid df-clel 2812, ax-8 2116. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ralf0 4451* | The quantification of a falsehood is vacuous when true. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ral0 4452 | Vacuous universal quantification is always true. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2005.) Avoid df-clel 2812, ax-8 2116. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | r19.2z 4453* | Theorem 19.2 of [Margaris] p. 89 with restricted quantifiers (compare 19.2 1978). The restricted version is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2003.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | r19.2zb 4454* | A response to the notion that the condition 𝐴 ≠ ∅ can be removed in r19.2z 4453. Interestingly enough, 𝜑 does not figure in the left-hand side. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Aug-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.3rz 4455* | Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by FL, 3-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.28z 4456* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2010.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.3rzv 4457* | Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-1997.) Avoid ax-12 2185. (Revised by TM, 16-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.3rzvOLD 4458* | Obsolete version of r19.3rzv 4457 as of 16-Feb-2026. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-1997.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.9rzv 4459* | Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.28zv 4460* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.37zv 4461* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 8-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.45zv 4462* | Restricted version of Theorem 19.45 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.44zv 4463* | Restricted version of Theorem 19.44 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.27z 4464* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.27 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2010.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.27zv 4465* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.27 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.36zv 4466* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | ralnralall 4467* | A contradiction concerning restricted generalization for a nonempty set implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | falseral0 4468* | A false statement can only be true for elements of an empty set. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.) (Proof shortened by TM, 16-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | falseral0OLD 4469* | Obsolete version of falseral0 4468 as of 16-Feb-2026. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ralidmw 4470* | Idempotent law for restricted quantifier. Weak version of ralidm 4471, which does not require ax-10 2147, ax-12 2185, but requires ax-8 2116. (Contributed by GG, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ralidm 4471 | Idempotent law for restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1997.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | raaan 4472* | Rearrange restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2010.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | raaanv 4473* | Rearrange restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sbss 4474* | Set substitution into the first argument of a subset relation. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 7-Jul-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sbcssg 4475 | Distribute proper substitution through a subclass relation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof shortened by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | raaan2 4476* | Rearrange restricted quantifiers with two different restricting classes, analogous to raaan 4472. It is necessary that either both restricting classes are empty or both are not empty. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ↔ 𝐵 = ∅) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | 2reu4lem 4477* | Lemma for 2reu4 4478. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤))))) | ||
| Theorem | 2reu4 4478* | Definition of double restricted existential uniqueness ("exactly one 𝑥 and exactly one 𝑦"), analogous to 2eu4 2656. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | csbdif 4479 | Distribution of class substitution over difference of two classes. (Contributed by ML, 14-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∖ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
This subsection introduces the conditional operator for classes, denoted by if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) (see df-if 4481). It is the analogue for classes of the conditional operator for propositions, denoted by if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) (see df-ifp 1064). | ||
| Syntax | cif 4480 | Extend class notation to include the conditional operator for classes. |
| class if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) | ||
| Definition | df-if 4481* |
Definition of the conditional operator for classes. The expression
if(𝜑,
𝐴, 𝐵) is read "if 𝜑 then
𝐴
else 𝐵". See
iftrue 4486 and iffalse 4489 for its values. In the mathematical
literature,
this operator is rarely defined formally but is implicit in informal
definitions such as "let f(x)=0 if x=0 and 1/x otherwise".
An important use for us is in conjunction with the weak deduction theorem, which is described in the next section, beginning at dedth 4539. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))} | ||
| Theorem | dfif2 4482* | An alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4481 with one fewer connectives (but probably less intuitive to understand). (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))} | ||
| Theorem | dfif6 4483* | An alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4481 as a simple class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq1 4484 | Equality theorem for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq2 4485 | Equality theorem for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | iftrue 4486 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is true. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | iftruei 4487 | Inference associated with iftrue 4486. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | iftrued 4488 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is true. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜒, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | iffalse 4489 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is false. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | iffalsei 4490 | Inference associated with iffalse 4489. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | iffalsed 4491 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is false. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜒, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ifnefalse 4492 | When values are unequal, but an "if" condition checks if they are equal, then the "false" branch results. This is a simple utility to provide a slight shortening and simplification of proofs versus applying iffalse 4489 directly in this case. It happens, e.g., in oevn0 8444. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → if(𝐴 = 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷) = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | iftrueb 4493 | When the branches are not equal, an "if" condition results in the first branch if and only if its condition is true. (Contributed by SN, 16-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ifsb 4494 | Distribute a function over an if-clause. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2013.) |
| ⊢ (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐶 = if(𝜑, 𝐷, 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | dfif3 4495* | Alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4481. Note that 𝜑 is independent of 𝑥 i.e. a constant true or false. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ (V ∖ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | dfif4 4496* | Alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4481. Note that 𝜑 is independent of 𝑥 i.e. a constant true or false. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ ((𝐴 ∪ (V ∖ 𝐶)) ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | dfif5 4497* | Alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4481. Note that 𝜑 is independent of 𝑥 i.e. a constant true or false (see also ab0orv 4336). (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 18-Aug-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ (((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) ∪ ((𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∩ (V ∖ 𝐶)))) | ||
| Theorem | ifssun 4498 | A conditional class is included in the union of its two alternatives. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq12 4499 | Equality theorem for conditional operators. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq1d 4500 | Equality deduction for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝐶)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |