| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 45 of 509) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31407) |
(31408-32930) |
(32931-50831) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | csbab 4401* | Move substitution into a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2005.) (Revised by NM, 19-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | csbun 4402 | Distribution of class substitution over union of two classes. (Contributed by Drahflow, 23-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) (Revised by NM, 13-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbin 4403 | Distribute proper substitution into a class through an intersection relation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Revised by NM, 18-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbie2df 4404* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. This version of csbiedf 3880 avoids a disjointness condition on 𝑥, 𝐴 and 𝑥, 𝐷 by substituting twice. Deduction form of csbie2 3889. (Contributed by AV, 29-Mar-2024.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | 2nreu 4405* | If there are two different sets fulfilling a wff (by implicit substitution), then there is no unique set fulfilling the wff. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → ¬ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | disj 4406* | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint (have no members in common). (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) Avoid ax-10 2178, ax-11 2194, ax-12 2215. (Revised by GG, 28-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | disjr 4407* | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | disj1 4408* | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint (have no members in common). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | reldisj 4409 | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint, using the complement of 𝐵 relative to a universe 𝐶. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) Avoid ax-12 2215. (Revised by GG, 28-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | disj3 4410 | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | disjne 4411 | Members of disjoint sets are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | disjeq0 4412 | Two disjoint sets are equal iff both are empty. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | disjel 4413 | A set can't belong to both members of disjoint classes. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | disj2 4414 | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ (V ∖ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | disj4 4415 | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊊ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ssdisj 4416 | Intersection with a subclass of a disjoint class. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | disjpss 4417 | A class is a proper subset of its union with a disjoint nonempty class. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | undisj1 4418 | The union of disjoint classes is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅ ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | undisj2 4419 | The union of disjoint classes is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ssindif0 4420 | Subclass expressed in terms of intersection with difference from the universal class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (V ∖ 𝐵)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | inelcm 4421 | The intersection of classes with a common member is nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | minel 4422 | A minimum element of a class has no elements in common with the class. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | undif4 4423 | Distribute union over difference. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅ → (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | disjssun 4424 | Subset relation for disjoint classes. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | vdif0 4425 | Universal class equality in terms of empty difference. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = V ↔ (V ∖ 𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | difrab0eq 4426* | If the difference between the restricting class of a restricted class abstraction and the restricted class abstraction is empty, the restricting class is equal to this restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑉 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) = ∅ ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | pssnel 4427* | A proper subclass has a member in one argument that's not in both. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | disjdifg 4428 | A class does not intersect a relative complement of a superclass. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.) Generalize from disjdif 4429. (Revised by BJ, 19-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | disjdif 4429 | A class and its relative complement are disjoint. Theorem 38 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | disjdifr 4430 | A class and its relative complement are disjoint. Commuted form of disjdif 4429. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | difin0 4431 | The difference of a class from its intersection is empty. Theorem 37 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐵) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | unvdif 4432 | The union of a class and its complement is the universe. Theorem 5.1(5) of [Stoll] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (V ∖ 𝐴)) = V | ||
| Theorem | undif1 4433 | Absorption of difference by union. This decomposes a union into two disjoint classes (see disjdif 4429). Theorem 35 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undif2 4434 | Absorption of difference by union. This decomposes a union into two disjoint classes (see disjdif 4429). Part of proof of Corollary 6K of [Enderton] p. 144. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | srcmpltd 4435 | If a statement is true for every element of a class and for every element of its complement relative to a second class, then it is true for every element in the second class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | prsrcmpltd 4436 | If a statement is true for all pairs of elements of a class, all pairs of elements of its complement relative to a second class, and all pairs with one element in each, then it is true for all pairs of elements of the second class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | undifabs 4437 | Absorption of difference by union. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | inundif 4438 | The intersection and class difference of a class with another class unite to give the original class. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 5-Jun-2009.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | disjdif2 4439 | The difference of a class and a class disjoint from it is the original class. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | difun2 4440 | Absorption of union by difference. Theorem 36 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undif 4441 | Union of complementary parts into whole. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undifr 4442 | Union of complementary parts into whole. Commuted form of undifr 4442. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Nov-2023.) (Proof shortened by SN, 11-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∪ 𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undif5 4443 | An equality involving class union and class difference. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ssdifin0 4444 | A subset of a difference does not intersect the subtrahend. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 1-Sep-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ssdifeq0 4445 | A class is a subclass of itself subtracted from another iff it is the empty set. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ssundif 4446 | A condition equivalent to inclusion in the union of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | difcom 4447 | Swap the arguments of a class difference. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pssdifcom1 4448 | Two ways to express overlapping subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → ((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵) ⊊ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pssdifcom2 4449 | Two ways to express non-covering pairs of subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐵 ⊊ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | difdifdir 4450 | Distributive law for class difference. Exercise 4.8 of [Stoll] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∖ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | uneqdifeq 4451 | Two ways to say that 𝐴 and 𝐵 partition 𝐶 (when 𝐴 and 𝐵 don't overlap and 𝐴 is a part of 𝐶). (Contributed by FL, 17-Nov-2008.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | raldifeq 4452* | Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | rzal 4453* | Vacuous quantification is always true. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) Avoid df-clel 2837, ax-8 2147. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rzalALT 4454* | Alternate proof of rzal 4453. Shorter, but requiring df-clel 2837, ax-8 2147. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rexn0 4455* | Restricted existential quantification implies its restriction is nonempty. (Contributed by Szymon Jaroszewicz, 3-Apr-2007.) Avoid df-clel 2837, ax-8 2147. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ralf0 4456* | The quantification of a falsehood is vacuous when true. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ral0 4457 | Vacuous universal quantification is always true. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2005.) Avoid df-clel 2837, ax-8 2147. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | r19.2z 4458* | Theorem 19.2 of [Margaris] p. 89 with restricted quantifiers (compare 19.2 2009). The restricted version is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2003.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | r19.2zb 4459* | A response to the notion that the condition 𝐴 ≠ ∅ can be removed in r19.2z 4458. Interestingly enough, 𝜑 does not figure in the left-hand side. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Aug-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.3rz 4460* | Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by FL, 3-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.28z 4461* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2010.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.3rzv 4462* | Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-1997.) Avoid ax-12 2215. (Revised by TM, 16-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.3rzvOLD 4463* | Obsolete version of r19.3rzv 4462 as of 16-Feb-2026. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-1997.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.9rzv 4464* | Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.28zv 4465* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.37zv 4466* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 8-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.45zv 4467* | Restricted version of Theorem 19.45 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.44zv 4468* | Restricted version of Theorem 19.44 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.27z 4469* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.27 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2010.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.27zv 4470* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.27 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.36zv 4471* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | ralnralall 4472* | A contradiction concerning restricted generalization for a nonempty set implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | falseral0 4473* | A false statement can only be true for elements of an empty set. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.) (Proof shortened by TM, 16-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | falseral0OLD 4474* | Obsolete version of falseral0 4473 as of 16-Feb-2026. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ralidmw 4475* | Idempotent law for restricted quantifier. Weak version of ralidm 4476, which does not require ax-10 2178, ax-12 2215, but requires ax-8 2147. (Contributed by GG, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ralidm 4476 | Idempotent law for restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1997.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | raaan 4477* | Rearrange restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2010.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | raaanv 4478* | Rearrange restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sbss 4479* | Set substitution into the first argument of a subset relation. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 7-Jul-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sbcssg 4480 | Distribute proper substitution through a subclass relation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof shortened by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | raaan2 4481* | Rearrange restricted quantifiers with two different restricting classes, analogous to raaan 4477. It is necessary that either both restricting classes are empty or both are not empty. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ↔ 𝐵 = ∅) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | 2reu4lem 4482* | Lemma for 2reu4 4483. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤))))) | ||
| Theorem | 2reu4 4483* | Definition of double restricted existential uniqueness ("exactly one 𝑥 and exactly one 𝑦"), analogous to 2eu4 2681. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | csbdif 4484 | Distribution of class substitution over difference of two classes. (Contributed by ML, 14-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∖ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
This subsection introduces the conditional operator for classes, denoted by if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) (see df-if 4486). It is the analogue for classes of the conditional operator for propositions, denoted by if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) (see df-ifp 1079). | ||
| Syntax | cif 4485 | Extend class notation to include the conditional operator for classes. |
| class if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) | ||
| Definition | df-if 4486* |
Definition of the conditional operator for classes. The expression
if(𝜑,
𝐴, 𝐵) is read "if 𝜑 then
𝐴
else 𝐵". See
iftrue 4491 and iffalse 4494 for its values. In the mathematical
literature,
this operator is rarely defined formally but is implicit in informal
definitions such as "let f(x)=0 if x=0 and 1/x otherwise".
An important use for us is in conjunction with the weak deduction theorem, which is described in the next section, beginning at dedth 4544. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))} | ||
| Theorem | dfif2 4487* | An alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4486 with one fewer connectives (but probably less intuitive to understand). (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))} | ||
| Theorem | dfif6 4488* | An alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4486 as a simple class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq1 4489 | Equality theorem for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq2 4490 | Equality theorem for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | iftrue 4491 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is true. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | iftruei 4492 | Inference associated with iftrue 4491. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | iftrued 4493 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is true. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜒, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | iffalse 4494 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is false. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | iffalsei 4495 | Inference associated with iffalse 4494. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | iffalsed 4496 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is false. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜒, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ifnefalse 4497 | When values are unequal, but an "if" condition checks if they are equal, then the "false" branch results. This is a simple utility to provide a slight shortening and simplification of proofs versus applying iffalse 4494 directly in this case. It happens, e.g., in oevn0 8506. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → if(𝐴 = 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷) = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | iftrueb 4498 | When the branches are not equal, an "if" condition results in the first branch if and only if its condition is true. (Contributed by SN, 16-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ifsb 4499 | Distribute a function over an if-clause. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2013.) |
| ⊢ (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐶 = if(𝜑, 𝐷, 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | dfif3 4500* | Alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4486. Note that 𝜑 is independent of 𝑥 i.e. a constant true or false. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ (V ∖ 𝐶))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |