| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 45 of 507) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31300) |
(31301-32823) |
(32824-50686) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | csbidm 4401* | Idempotent law for class substitutions. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Revised by NM, 18-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | csbvarg 4402 | The proper substitution of a class for setvar variable results in the class (if the class exists). (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑥 = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | csbvargi 4403 | The proper substitution of a class for a setvar variable results in the class (if the class exists), in inference form of csbvarg 4402. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑥 = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | sbccsb 4404* | Substitution into a wff expressed in terms of substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-2007.) (Revised by NM, 18-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | sbccsb2 4405 | Substitution into a wff expressed in using substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2005.) (Revised by NM, 18-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | rspcsbela 4406* | Special case related to rspsbc 3835. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 17-Jan-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | sbnfc2 4407* | Two ways of expressing "𝑥 is (effectively) not free in 𝐴". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑧⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 = ⦋𝑧 / 𝑥⦌𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | csbab 4408* | Move substitution into a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2005.) (Revised by NM, 19-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | csbun 4409 | Distribution of class substitution over union of two classes. (Contributed by Drahflow, 23-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) (Revised by NM, 13-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbin 4410 | Distribute proper substitution into a class through an intersection relation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Revised by NM, 18-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbie2df 4411* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. This version of csbiedf 3886 avoids a disjointness condition on 𝑥, 𝐴 and 𝑥, 𝐷 by substituting twice. Deduction form of csbie2 3895. (Contributed by AV, 29-Mar-2024.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | 2nreu 4412* | If there are two different sets fulfilling a wff (by implicit substitution), then there is no unique set fulfilling the wff. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → ¬ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | disj 4413* | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint (have no members in common). (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) Avoid ax-10 2179, ax-11 2195, ax-12 2216. (Revised by GG, 28-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | disjr 4414* | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | disj1 4415* | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint (have no members in common). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | reldisj 4416 | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint, using the complement of 𝐵 relative to a universe 𝐶. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) Avoid ax-12 2216. (Revised by GG, 28-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | disj3 4417 | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | disjne 4418 | Members of disjoint sets are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | disjeq0 4419 | Two disjoint sets are equal iff both are empty. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | disjel 4420 | A set can't belong to both members of disjoint classes. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | disj2 4421 | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ (V ∖ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | disj4 4422 | Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊊ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ssdisj 4423 | Intersection with a subclass of a disjoint class. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | disjpss 4424 | A class is a proper subset of its union with a disjoint nonempty class. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | undisj1 4425 | The union of disjoint classes is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅ ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | undisj2 4426 | The union of disjoint classes is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ssindif0 4427 | Subclass expressed in terms of intersection with difference from the universal class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (V ∖ 𝐵)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | inelcm 4428 | The intersection of classes with a common member is nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | minel 4429 | A minimum element of a class has no elements in common with the class. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | undif4 4430 | Distribute union over difference. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅ → (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | disjssun 4431 | Subset relation for disjoint classes. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | vdif0 4432 | Universal class equality in terms of empty difference. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = V ↔ (V ∖ 𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | difrab0eq 4433* | If the difference between the restricting class of a restricted class abstraction and the restricted class abstraction is empty, the restricting class is equal to this restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑉 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) = ∅ ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | pssnel 4434* | A proper subclass has a member in one argument that's not in both. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | disjdifg 4435 | A class does not intersect a relative complement of a superclass. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.) Generalize from disjdif 4436. (Revised by BJ, 19-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | disjdif 4436 | A class and its relative complement are disjoint. Theorem 38 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | disjdifr 4437 | A class and its relative complement are disjoint. Commuted form of disjdif 4436. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | difin0 4438 | The difference of a class from its intersection is empty. Theorem 37 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐵) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | unvdif 4439 | The union of a class and its complement is the universe. Theorem 5.1(5) of [Stoll] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (V ∖ 𝐴)) = V | ||
| Theorem | undif1 4440 | Absorption of difference by union. This decomposes a union into two disjoint classes (see disjdif 4436). Theorem 35 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undif2 4441 | Absorption of difference by union. This decomposes a union into two disjoint classes (see disjdif 4436). Part of proof of Corollary 6K of [Enderton] p. 144. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | srcmpltd 4442 | If a statement is true for every element of a class and for every element of its complement relative to a second class, then it is true for every element in the second class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | prsrcmpltd 4443 | If a statement is true for all pairs of elements of a class, all pairs of elements of its complement relative to a second class, and all pairs with one element in each, then it is true for all pairs of elements of the second class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | undifabs 4444 | Absorption of difference by union. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | inundif 4445 | The intersection and class difference of a class with another class unite to give the original class. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 5-Jun-2009.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | disjdif2 4446 | The difference of a class and a class disjoint from it is the original class. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | difun2 4447 | Absorption of union by difference. Theorem 36 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undif 4448 | Union of complementary parts into whole. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undifr 4449 | Union of complementary parts into whole. Commuted form of undifr 4449. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Nov-2023.) (Proof shortened by SN, 11-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∪ 𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | undif5 4450 | An equality involving class union and class difference. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ssdifin0 4451 | A subset of a difference does not intersect the subtrahend. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 1-Sep-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ssdifeq0 4452 | A class is a subclass of itself subtracted from another iff it is the empty set. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ssundif 4453 | A condition equivalent to inclusion in the union of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | difcom 4454 | Swap the arguments of a class difference. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pssdifcom1 4455 | Two ways to express overlapping subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → ((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵) ⊊ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pssdifcom2 4456 | Two ways to express non-covering pairs of subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐵 ⊊ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | difdifdir 4457 | Distributive law for class difference. Exercise 4.8 of [Stoll] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∖ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | uneqdifeq 4458 | Two ways to say that 𝐴 and 𝐵 partition 𝐶 (when 𝐴 and 𝐵 don't overlap and 𝐴 is a part of 𝐶). (Contributed by FL, 17-Nov-2008.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | raldifeq 4459* | Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | rzal 4460* | Vacuous quantification is always true. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) Avoid df-clel 2841, ax-8 2148. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rzalALT 4461* | Alternate proof of rzal 4460. Shorter, but requiring df-clel 2841, ax-8 2148. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rexn0 4462* | Restricted existential quantification implies its restriction is nonempty. (Contributed by Szymon Jaroszewicz, 3-Apr-2007.) Avoid df-clel 2841, ax-8 2148. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ralf0 4463* | The quantification of a falsehood is vacuous when true. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ral0 4464 | Vacuous universal quantification is always true. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2005.) Avoid df-clel 2841, ax-8 2148. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | r19.2z 4465* | Theorem 19.2 of [Margaris] p. 89 with restricted quantifiers (compare 19.2 2009). The restricted version is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2003.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | r19.2zb 4466* | A response to the notion that the condition 𝐴 ≠ ∅ can be removed in r19.2z 4465. Interestingly enough, 𝜑 does not figure in the left-hand side. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Aug-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.3rz 4467* | Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by FL, 3-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.28z 4468* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2010.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.3rzv 4469* | Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-1997.) Avoid ax-12 2216. (Revised by TM, 16-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.3rzvOLD 4470* | Obsolete version of r19.3rzv 4469 as of 16-Feb-2026. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-1997.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.9rzv 4471* | Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | r19.28zv 4472* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.37zv 4473* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 8-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.45zv 4474* | Restricted version of Theorem 19.45 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.44zv 4475* | Restricted version of Theorem 19.44 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.27z 4476* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.27 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2010.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.27zv 4477* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.27 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.36zv 4478* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | ralnralall 4479* | A contradiction concerning restricted generalization for a nonempty set implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | falseral0 4480* | A false statement can only be true for elements of an empty set. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.) (Proof shortened by TM, 16-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | falseral0OLD 4481* | Obsolete version of falseral0 4480 as of 16-Feb-2026. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ralidmw 4482* | Idempotent law for restricted quantifier. Weak version of ralidm 4483, which does not require ax-10 2179, ax-12 2216, but requires ax-8 2148. (Contributed by GG, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ralidm 4483 | Idempotent law for restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1997.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | raaan 4484* | Rearrange restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2010.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | raaanv 4485* | Rearrange restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sbss 4486* | Set substitution into the first argument of a subset relation. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 7-Jul-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sbcssg 4487 | Distribute proper substitution through a subclass relation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof shortened by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | raaan2 4488* | Rearrange restricted quantifiers with two different restricting classes, analogous to raaan 4484. It is necessary that either both restricting classes are empty or both are not empty. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ↔ 𝐵 = ∅) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | 2reu4lem 4489* | Lemma for 2reu4 4490. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤))))) | ||
| Theorem | 2reu4 4490* | Definition of double restricted existential uniqueness ("exactly one 𝑥 and exactly one 𝑦"), analogous to 2eu4 2685. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | csbdif 4491 | Distribution of class substitution over difference of two classes. (Contributed by ML, 14-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∖ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
This subsection introduces the conditional operator for classes, denoted by if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) (see df-if 4493). It is the analogue for classes of the conditional operator for propositions, denoted by if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) (see df-ifp 1079). | ||
| Syntax | cif 4492 | Extend class notation to include the conditional operator for classes. |
| class if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) | ||
| Definition | df-if 4493* |
Definition of the conditional operator for classes. The expression
if(𝜑,
𝐴, 𝐵) is read "if 𝜑 then
𝐴
else 𝐵". See
iftrue 4498 and iffalse 4501 for its values. In the mathematical
literature,
this operator is rarely defined formally but is implicit in informal
definitions such as "let f(x)=0 if x=0 and 1/x otherwise".
An important use for us is in conjunction with the weak deduction theorem, which is described in the next section, beginning at dedth 4551. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))} | ||
| Theorem | dfif2 4494* | An alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4493 with one fewer connectives (but probably less intuitive to understand). (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))} | ||
| Theorem | dfif6 4495* | An alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4493 as a simple class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq1 4496 | Equality theorem for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq2 4497 | Equality theorem for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | iftrue 4498 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is true. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | iftruei 4499 | Inference associated with iftrue 4498. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | iftrued 4500 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is true. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜒, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |