Theorem drnfc2 2928

Description: Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Proof revision is marked as discouraged because the minimizer replaces albidv 1923 with dral2 2438, leading to a one byte longer proof. However feel free to manually edit it according to conventions. (TODO: dral2 2438 depends on ax-13 2372, hence its usage during minimizing is discouraged. Check in the long run whether this is a permanent restriction). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-8 2108. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 22-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
drnfc1.1	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
drnfc2	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑧𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑧𝐵))

Proof of Theorem drnfc2

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		drnfc1.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
2		eleq2w2 2734	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	drnf2 2444	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑧 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑧 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	albidv 1923	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑧 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑧 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
6		df-nfc 2889	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑧𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑧 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴)
7		df-nfc 2889	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑧𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑧 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)
8	5, 6, 7	3bitr4g 314	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑧𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑧𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wal 1537   = wceq 1539  Ⅎwnf 1786   ∈ wcel 2106  Ⅎwnfc 2887

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-13 2372  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-cleq 2730  df-nfc 2889

This theorem is referenced by: (None)