P. 30 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 2901-3000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	abid2 2901*	A simplification of class abstraction. Commuted form of abid1 2900. See comments there. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
Theorem	eqab 2902*	One direction of eqabb 2903 is provable from fewer axioms. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 13-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑) → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	eqabb 2903*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (also called a class builder). Theorem 5.1 of [Quine] p. 34. This theorem shows the relationship between expressions with class abstractions and expressions with class variables. Note that abbib 2832 and its relatives are among those useful for converting theorems with class variables to equivalent theorems with wff variables, by first substituting a class abstraction for each class variable. Class variables can always be eliminated from a theorem to result in an equivalent theorem with wff variables, and vice-versa. The idea is roughly as follows. To convert a theorem with a wff variable 𝜑 (that has a free variable 𝑥) to a theorem with a class variable 𝐴, we substitute 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 for 𝜑 throughout and simplify, where 𝐴 is a new class variable not already in the wff. An example is the conversion of sepgi 5255 to inex1 5281 (look at the instance of sepgi 5255 that occurs in the proof of inex1 5281). Conversely, to convert a theorem with a class variable 𝐴 to one with 𝜑, we substitute {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} for 𝐴 throughout and simplify, where 𝑥 and 𝜑 are new setvar and wff variables not already in the wff. Examples include dfsymdif2 4209 and cp 9981; the latter derives a formula containing wff variables from substitution instances of the class variables in its equivalent formulation cplem2 9979. For more information on class variables, see Quine pp. 15-21 and/or Takeuti and Zaring pp. 10-13. Usage of eqabbw 2837 is preferred since it requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	eqabcb 2904*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. Commuted form of eqabb 2903. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	eqabrd 2905	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (deduction form of eqabb 2903). (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	eqabri 2906	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	eqabcri 2907	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Nov-2019.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	clelab 2908*	Membership of a class variable in a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-11 2197, see sbc5ALT 3771 for more details. (Revised by SN, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	clabel 2909*	Membership of a class abstraction in another class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)))
Theorem	sbab 2910*	The right-hand side of the second equality is a way of representing proper substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a class variable. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
2.1.3  Class form not-free predicate
Syntax	wnfc 2911	Extend wff definition to include the not-free predicate for classes.
wff Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcjust 2912*	Justification theorem for df-nfc 2913. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
Definition	df-nfc 2913*	Define the not-free predicate for classes. This is read "𝑥 is not free in 𝐴". Not-free means that the value of 𝑥 cannot affect the value of 𝐴, e.g., any occurrence of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is effectively bound by a "for all" or something that expands to one (such as "there exists"). It is defined in terms of the not-free predicate df-nf 1817 for wffs; see that definition for more information. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfci 2914*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcii 2915*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcr 2916*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Drop ax-12 2216 but use ax-8 2149, df-clel 2839, and avoid a DV condition on 𝑦, 𝐴. (Revised by SN, 3-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcrALT 2917*	Alternate version of nfcr 2916. Avoids ax-8 2149 but uses ax-12 2216. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcri 2918*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2180, ax-11 2197. (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.) Avoid ax-12 2216 (adopting Wolf Lammen's 13-May-2023 proof). (Revised by SN, 3-Jun-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	nfcd 2919*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	nfcrd 2920*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcrii 2921*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2180, ax-11 2197. (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfceqdf 2922	An equality theorem for effectively not free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-8 2149 and df-clel 2839. (Revised by WL and SN, 23-Aug-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵))
Theorem	nfceqi 2923	Equality theorem for class not-free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-12 2216. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jun-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
Theorem	nfcxfr 2924	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcxfrd 2925	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	nfcv 2926*	If 𝑥 is disjoint from 𝐴, then 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcvd 2927*	If 𝑥 is disjoint from 𝐴, then 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	nfab1 2928	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfnfc1 2929	The setvar 𝑥 is bound in Ⅎ𝑥𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	clelsb1fw 2930*	Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2155). Version of clelsb1f 2931 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) Avoid ax-13 2404. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	clelsb1f 2931	Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2155). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See clelsb1fw 2930 not requiring ax-13 2404, but extra disjoint variables. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-May-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfab 2932*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Add disjoint variable condition to avoid ax-13 2404. See nfabg 2933 for a less restrictive version requiring more axioms. (Revised by GG, 20-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfabg 2933	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See nfab 2932 for a version with more disjoint variable conditions, but not requiring ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfaba1 2934*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) Add disjoint variable condition to avoid ax-13 2404. See nfaba1g 2935 for a less restrictive version requiring more axioms. (Revised by GG, 20-Jan-2024.) Avoid ax-12 2216. (Revised by SN, 14-May-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝜑}
Theorem	nfaba1g 2935	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See nfaba1 2934 for a version with a disjoint variable condition, but not requiring ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝜑}
Theorem	nfeqd 2936	Hypothesis builder for equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	nfeld 2937	Hypothesis builder for elementhood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	nfnfc 2938	Hypothesis builder for Ⅎ𝑦𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-13 2404. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-Dec-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
Theorem	nfeq 2939	Hypothesis builder for equality. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	nfel 2940	Hypothesis builder for elementhood. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	nfeq1 2941*	Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	nfel1 2942*	Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	nfeq2 2943*	Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	nfel2 2944*	Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	drnfc1 2945	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-8 2149, ax-11 2197. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 22-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵))
Theorem	drnfc2 2946	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Proof revision is marked as discouraged because the minimizer replaces albidv 1955 with dral2 2470, leading to a one byte longer proof. However feel free to manually edit it according to conventions. (TODO: dral2 2470 depends on ax-13 2404, hence its usage during minimizing is discouraged. Check in the long run whether this is a permanent restriction). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-8 2149. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 22-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑧𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑧𝐵))
Theorem	nfabdw 2947*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Version of nfabd 2948 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-13 2404. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	nfabd 2948	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker nfabdw 2947 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-9 2157 and ax-ext 2735. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-May-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	nfabd2 2949	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	dvelimdc 2950	Deduction form of dvelimc 2951. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵))
Theorem	dvelimc 2951	Version of dvelim 2483 for classes. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
Theorem	nfcvf 2952	If 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct, then 𝑥 is not free in 𝑦. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See nfcv 2926 for a version that replaces the distinctor with a disjoint variable condition, requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-ext 2735. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑦)
Theorem	nfcvf2 2953	If 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct, then 𝑦 is not free in 𝑥. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See nfcv 2926 for a version that replaces the distinctor with a disjoint variable condition, requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑦𝑥)
Theorem	cleqf 2954	Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions as in dfcleq 2756. See also cleqh 2893. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-13 2404. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.) Avoid ax-10 2180. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	eqabf 2955	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. In this version, the fact that 𝑥 is a nonfree variable in 𝐴 is explicitly stated as a hypothesis. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-May-2017.) Avoid ax-13 2404. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	abid2f 2956	A simplification of class abstraction. Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Feb-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
Theorem	abid2fOLD 2957	Obsolete version of abid2f 2956 as of 26-Feb-2025. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
Theorem	sbabel 2958*	Theorem to move a substitution in and out of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]{𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝐴 ↔ {𝑧 ∣ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ 𝐴)
2.1.4  Negated equality and membership
2.1.4.1  Negated equality
Syntax	wne 2959	Extend wff notation to include inequality.
wff 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵
Definition	df-ne 2960	Define inequality. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	neii 2961	Inference associated with df-ne 2960. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	neir 2962	Inference associated with df-ne 2960. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵
Theorem	nne 2963	Negation of inequality. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2006.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	neneqd 2964	Deduction eliminating inequality definition. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	neneq 2965	From inequality to non-equality. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	neqned 2966	If it is not the case that two classes are equal, then they are unequal. Converse of neneqd 2964. One-way deduction form of df-ne 2960. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) Allow a shortening of necon3bi 2985. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	neqne 2967	From non-equality to inequality. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	neirr 2968	No class is unequal to itself. Inequality is irreflexive. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐴
Theorem	exmidne 2969	Excluded middle with equality and inequality. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	eqneqall 2970	A contradiction concerning equality implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜑))
Theorem	nonconne 2971	Law of noncontradiction with equality and inequality. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon3ad 2972	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon3bd 2973	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon2ad 2974	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon2bd 2975	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 13-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon1ad 2976	Contrapositive deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜓))
Theorem	necon1bd 2977	Contrapositive deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon4ad 2978	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon4bd 2979	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜓))
Theorem	necon3d 2980	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon1d 2981	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon2d 2982	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon4d 2983	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon3ai 2984	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	necon3bi 2985	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon1ai 2986	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 12-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜑)
Theorem	necon1bi 2987	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	necon2ai 2988	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon2bi 2989	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	necon4ai 2990	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	necon3i 2991	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-2006.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon1i 2992	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	necon2i 2993	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon4i 2994	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	necon3abid 2995	Deduction from equality to inequality. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon3bbid 2996	Deduction from equality to inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon1abid 2997	Contrapositive deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon1bbid 2998	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon4abid 2999	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2008.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon4bbid 3000	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))