P. 30 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 2901-3000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	abbi 2901	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	abid1 2902*	Every class is equal to a class abstraction (the class of sets belonging to it). Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. This is a generalization to classes of cvjust 2767. The proof does not rely on cvjust 2767, so cvjust 2767 could be proved as a special instance of it. Note however that abid1 2902 necessarily relies on df-clel 2840, whereas cvjust 2767 does not. This theorem requires ax-ext 2745, df-clab 2754, df-cleq 2765, df-clel 2840, but to prove that any specific class term not containing class variables is a setvar or can be written as (is equal to) a class abstraction does not require these $a-statements. This last fact is a metatheorem, consequence of the fact that the only $a-statements with typecode class are cv 1506, cab 2753 and statements corresponding to defined class constructors. Note on the simultaneous presence in set.mm of this abid1 2902 and its commuted form abid2 2903: It is rare that two forms so closely related both appear in set.mm. Indeed, such equalities are generally used in later proofs as parts of transitive inferences, and with the many variants of eqtri 2796 (search for *eqtr*), it would be rare that either one would shorten a proof compared to the other. There is typically a choice between (what we call) a "definitional form" where the shorter expression is on the lhs, and a "computational form" where the shorter expression is on the rhs. An example is df-2 11496 versus 1p1e2 11565. We do not need 1p1e2 11565, but because it occurs "naturally" in computations, it can be useful to have it directly, together with a uniform set of 1-digit operations like 1p2e3 11583, etc. In most cases, we do not need both a definitional and a computational forms. A definitional form would favor consistency with genuine definitions, while a computational form is often more natural. The situation is similar with biconditionals in propositional calculus: see for instance pm4.24 556 and anidm 557, while other biconditionals generally appear in a single form (either definitional, but more often computational). In the present case, the equality is important enough that both abid1 2902 and abid2 2903 are in set.mm. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 10-Nov-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}
Theorem	abid2 2903*	A simplification of class abstraction. Commuted form of abid1 2902. See comments there. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
Theorem	cbvabv 2904*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvab 2905 with disjoint variable conditions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.) Require 𝑥, 𝑦 be disjoint to avoid ax-11 2091 and ax-13 2299. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvab 2905	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvabvOLD 2906*	Obsolete version of cbvabv 2904 as of 9-May-2023. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	clelab 2907*	Membership of a class variable in a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	clabel 2908*	Membership of a class abstraction in another class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)))
Theorem	sbab 2909*	The right-hand side of the second equality is a way of representing proper substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a class variable. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
2.1.3  Class form not-free predicate
Syntax	wnfc 2910	Extend wff definition to include the not-free predicate for classes.
wff Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcjust 2911*	Justification theorem for df-nfc 2912. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
Definition	df-nfc 2912*	Define the not-free predicate for classes. This is read "𝑥 is not free in 𝐴". Not-free means that the value of 𝑥 cannot affect the value of 𝐴, e.g., any occurrence of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is effectively bound by a "for all" or something that expands to one (such as "there exists"). It is defined in terms of the not-free predicate df-nf 1747 for wffs; see that definition for more information. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfci 2913*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcii 2914*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcr 2915*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcriv 2916*	Consequence of the not-free predicate, similiar to nfcri 2920. Requires 𝑦 and 𝐴 be disjoint, but is not based on ax-13 2299. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	nfcd 2917*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	nfcrd 2918*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcrii 2919*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcri 2920*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Note that unlike nfcr 2915, this does not require 𝑦 and 𝐴 to be disjoint.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	nfceqdf 2921	An equality theorem for effectively not free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵))
Theorem	nfceqi 2922	Equality theorem for class not-free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-12 2104. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jun-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
Theorem	nfceqiOLD 2923	Obsolete proof of nfceqi 2922 as of 19-Jun-2023. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
Theorem	nfcxfr 2924	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcxfrd 2925	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	nfcv 2926*	If 𝑥 is disjoint from 𝐴, then 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcvd 2927*	If 𝑥 is disjoint from 𝐴, then 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	nfab1 2928	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfnfc1 2929	The setvar 𝑥 is bound in Ⅎ𝑥𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	clelsb3f 2930	Substitution applied to an atomic wff (class version of elsb3 2406). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-May-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	clelsb3fOLD 2931	Obsolete version of clelsb3f 2930 as of 7-May-2023. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfab 2932	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfaba1 2933	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝜑}
Theorem	nfeqd 2934	Hypothesis builder for equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	nfeld 2935	Hypothesis builder for elementhood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	nfnfc 2936	Hypothesis builder for Ⅎ𝑦𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-13 2299. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-Dec-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
Theorem	nfeq 2937	Hypothesis builder for equality. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	nfel 2938	Hypothesis builder for elementhood. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	nfeq1 2939*	Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	nfel1 2940*	Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	nfeq2 2941*	Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	nfel2 2942*	Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	drnfc1 2943	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-11 2091. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵))
Theorem	drnfc1OLD 2944	Obsolete version of drnfc1 2943 as of 10-May-2023. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵))
Theorem	drnfc2 2945	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Proof revision is marked as discouraged because the minimizer replaces albidv 1879 with dral2 2372, leading to a one byte longer proof. However feel free to manually edit it according to conventions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑧𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑧𝐵))
Theorem	nfabd 2946	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-9 2057 and ax-ext 2745. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-May-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	nfabd2 2947	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	nfabd2OLD 2948	Obsolete version of nfabd2 2947 as of 23-May-2023. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	nfabdOLD 2949	Obsolete version of nfabd 2946 as of 10-May-2023. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	dvelimdc 2950	Deduction form of dvelimc 2951. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵))
Theorem	dvelimc 2951	Version of dvelim 2385 for classes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
Theorem	nfcvf 2952	If 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct, then 𝑥 is not free in 𝑦. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-ext 2745. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑦)
Theorem	nfcvf2 2953	If 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct, then 𝑦 is not free in 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑦𝑥)
Theorem	nfcvfOLD 2954	Obsolete version of nfcvf 2952 as of 10-May-2023. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑦)
Theorem	cleqf 2955	Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. See also cleqh 2883. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-13 2299. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.) Avoid ax-10 2077. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	cleqfOLD 2956	Obsolete version of cleqf 2955 as of 10-May-2023. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	abid2f 2957	A simplification of class abstraction. Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
Theorem	abeq2f 2958	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. In this version, the fact that 𝑥 is a non-free variable in 𝐴 is explicitly stated as a hypothesis. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-May-2017.) Avoid ax-13 2299. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	abeq2fOLD 2959	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. In this version, the fact that 𝑥 is a non-free variable in 𝐴 is explicitly stated as a hypothesis. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-May-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	sbabel 2960*	Theorem to move a substitution in and out of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Dec-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]{𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝐴 ↔ {𝑧 ∣ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ 𝐴)
2.1.4  Negated equality and membership
2.1.4.1  Negated equality
Syntax	wne 2961	Extend wff notation to include inequality.
wff 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵
Definition	df-ne 2962	Define inequality. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	neii 2963	Inference associated with df-ne 2962. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	neir 2964	Inference associated with df-ne 2962. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵
Theorem	nne 2965	Negation of inequality. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2006.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	neneqd 2966	Deduction eliminating inequality definition. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	neneq 2967	From inequality to non-equality. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	neqned 2968	If it is not the case that two classes are equal, then they are unequal. Converse of neneqd 2966. One-way deduction form of df-ne 2962. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) Allow a shortening of necon3bi 2987. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	neqne 2969	From non-equality to inequality. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	neirr 2970	No class is unequal to itself. Inequality is irreflexive. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐴
Theorem	exmidne 2971	Excluded middle with equality and inequality. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	eqneqall 2972	A contradiction concerning equality implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜑))
Theorem	nonconne 2973	Law of noncontradiction with equality and inequality. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon3ad 2974	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon3bd 2975	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon2ad 2976	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon2bd 2977	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 13-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon1ad 2978	Contrapositive deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜓))
Theorem	necon1bd 2979	Contrapositive deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon4ad 2980	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon4bd 2981	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜓))
Theorem	necon3d 2982	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon1d 2983	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon2d 2984	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon4d 2985	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon3ai 2986	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	necon3bi 2987	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon1ai 2988	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 12-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜑)
Theorem	necon1bi 2989	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	necon2ai 2990	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon2bi 2991	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	necon4ai 2992	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	necon3i 2993	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-2006.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon1i 2994	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	necon2i 2995	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon4i 2996	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	necon3abid 2997	Deduction from equality to inequality. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon3bbid 2998	Deduction from equality to inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon1abid 2999	Contrapositive deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon1bbid 3000	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))