P. 30 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 2901-3000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	eqabcb 2901*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. Commuted form of eqabb 2900. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	eqabrd 2902	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (deduction form of eqabb 2900). (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	eqabri 2903	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	eqabcri 2904	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Nov-2019.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	clelab 2905*	Membership of a class variable in a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-11 2190, see sbc5ALT 3772 for more details. (Revised by SN, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	clabel 2906*	Membership of a class abstraction in another class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)))
Theorem	sbab 2907*	The right-hand side of the second equality is a way of representing proper substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a class variable. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
2.1.3  Class form not-free predicate
Syntax	wnfc 2908	Extend wff definition to include the not-free predicate for classes.
wff Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcjust 2909*	Justification theorem for df-nfc 2910. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
Definition	df-nfc 2910*	Define the not-free predicate for classes. This is read "𝑥 is not free in 𝐴". Not-free means that the value of 𝑥 cannot affect the value of 𝐴, e.g., any occurrence of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is effectively bound by a "for all" or something that expands to one (such as "there exists"). It is defined in terms of the not-free predicate df-nf 1812 for wffs; see that definition for more information. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfci 2911*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcii 2912*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcr 2913*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Drop ax-12 2211 but use ax-8 2143, df-clel 2836, and avoid a DV condition on 𝑦, 𝐴. (Revised by SN, 3-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcrALT 2914*	Alternate version of nfcr 2913. Avoids ax-8 2143 but uses ax-12 2211. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcri 2915*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2174, ax-11 2190. (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.) Avoid ax-12 2211 (adopting Wolf Lammen's 13-May-2023 proof). (Revised by SN, 3-Jun-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	nfcd 2916*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	nfcrd 2917*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcrii 2918*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2174, ax-11 2190. (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfceqdf 2919	An equality theorem for effectively not free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-8 2143 and df-clel 2836. (Revised by WL and SN, 23-Aug-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵))
Theorem	nfceqi 2920	Equality theorem for class not-free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-12 2211. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jun-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
Theorem	nfcxfr 2921	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcxfrd 2922	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	nfcv 2923*	If 𝑥 is disjoint from 𝐴, then 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcvd 2924*	If 𝑥 is disjoint from 𝐴, then 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	nfab1 2925	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfnfc1 2926	The setvar 𝑥 is bound in Ⅎ𝑥𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	clelsb1fw 2927*	Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2149). Version of clelsb1f 2928 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2402. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) Avoid ax-13 2402. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	clelsb1f 2928	Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2149). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. See clelsb1fw 2927 not requiring ax-13 2402, but extra disjoint variables. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-May-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfab 2929*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Add disjoint variable condition to avoid ax-13 2402. See nfabg 2930 for a less restrictive version requiring more axioms. (Revised by GG, 20-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfabg 2930	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. See nfab 2929 for a version with more disjoint variable conditions, but not requiring ax-13 2402. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfaba1 2931*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) Add disjoint variable condition to avoid ax-13 2402. See nfaba1g 2932 for a less restrictive version requiring more axioms. (Revised by GG, 20-Jan-2024.) Avoid ax-12 2211. (Revised by SN, 14-May-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝜑}
Theorem	nfaba1g 2932	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. See nfaba1 2931 for a version with a disjoint variable condition, but not requiring ax-13 2402. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝜑}
Theorem	nfeqd 2933	Hypothesis builder for equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	nfeld 2934	Hypothesis builder for elementhood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	nfnfc 2935	Hypothesis builder for Ⅎ𝑦𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-13 2402. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-Dec-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
Theorem	nfeq 2936	Hypothesis builder for equality. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	nfel 2937	Hypothesis builder for elementhood. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	nfeq1 2938*	Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	nfel1 2939*	Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	nfeq2 2940*	Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	nfel2 2941*	Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	drnfc1 2942	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-8 2143, ax-11 2190. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 22-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵))
Theorem	drnfc2 2943	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Proof revision is marked as discouraged because the minimizer replaces albidv 1948 with dral2 2468, leading to a one byte longer proof. However feel free to manually edit it according to conventions. (TODO: dral2 2468 depends on ax-13 2402, hence its usage during minimizing is discouraged. Check in the long run whether this is a permanent restriction). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-8 2143. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 22-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑧𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑧𝐵))
Theorem	nfabdw 2944*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Version of nfabd 2945 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2402. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-13 2402. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	nfabd 2945	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. Use the weaker nfabdw 2944 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-9 2151 and ax-ext 2733. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-May-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	nfabd2 2946	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	dvelimdc 2947	Deduction form of dvelimc 2948. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵))
Theorem	dvelimc 2948	Version of dvelim 2481 for classes. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
Theorem	nfcvf 2949	If 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct, then 𝑥 is not free in 𝑦. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. See nfcv 2923 for a version that replaces the distinctor with a disjoint variable condition, requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-ext 2733. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑦)
Theorem	nfcvf2 2950	If 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct, then 𝑦 is not free in 𝑥. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. See nfcv 2923 for a version that replaces the distinctor with a disjoint variable condition, requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑦𝑥)
Theorem	cleqf 2951	Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions as in dfcleq 2754. See also cleqh 2890. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-13 2402. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.) Avoid ax-10 2174. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	eqabf 2952	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. In this version, the fact that 𝑥 is a nonfree variable in 𝐴 is explicitly stated as a hypothesis. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-May-2017.) Avoid ax-13 2402. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	abid2f 2953	A simplification of class abstraction. Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Feb-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
Theorem	abid2fOLD 2954	Obsolete version of abid2f 2953 as of 26-Feb-2025. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
Theorem	sbabel 2955*	Theorem to move a substitution in and out of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]{𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝐴 ↔ {𝑧 ∣ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ 𝐴)
2.1.4  Negated equality and membership
2.1.4.1  Negated equality
Syntax	wne 2956	Extend wff notation to include inequality.
wff 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵
Definition	df-ne 2957	Define inequality. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	neii 2958	Inference associated with df-ne 2957. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	neir 2959	Inference associated with df-ne 2957. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵
Theorem	nne 2960	Negation of inequality. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2006.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	neneqd 2961	Deduction eliminating inequality definition. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	neneq 2962	From inequality to non-equality. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	neqned 2963	If it is not the case that two classes are equal, then they are unequal. Converse of neneqd 2961. One-way deduction form of df-ne 2957. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) Allow a shortening of necon3bi 2982. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	neqne 2964	From non-equality to inequality. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	neirr 2965	No class is unequal to itself. Inequality is irreflexive. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐴
Theorem	exmidne 2966	Excluded middle with equality and inequality. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	eqneqall 2967	A contradiction concerning equality implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜑))
Theorem	nonconne 2968	Law of noncontradiction with equality and inequality. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon3ad 2969	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon3bd 2970	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon2ad 2971	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon2bd 2972	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 13-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon1ad 2973	Contrapositive deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜓))
Theorem	necon1bd 2974	Contrapositive deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon4ad 2975	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon4bd 2976	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜓))
Theorem	necon3d 2977	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon1d 2978	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon2d 2979	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon4d 2980	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon3ai 2981	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	necon3bi 2982	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon1ai 2983	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 12-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜑)
Theorem	necon1bi 2984	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	necon2ai 2985	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon2bi 2986	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	necon4ai 2987	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	necon3i 2988	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-2006.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon1i 2989	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	necon2i 2990	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	necon4i 2991	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	necon3abid 2992	Deduction from equality to inequality. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon3bbid 2993	Deduction from equality to inequality. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon1abid 2994	Contrapositive deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon1bbid 2995	Contrapositive inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon4abid 2996	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2008.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon4bbid 2997	Contrapositive law deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	necon2abid 2998	Contrapositive deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jul-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	necon2bbid 2999	Contrapositive deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 13-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	necon3bid 3000	Deduction from equality to inequality. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))