Theorem eleq2w2 2765

Description: A weaker version of eleq2 2858 (but stronger than ax-9 2159 and elequ2 2164) that uses ax-12 2219 to avoid ax-8 2151 and df-clel 2844. Compare eleq2w 2853, whose setvars appear where the class variables are in this theorem, and vice versa. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Jun-2019.) Strengthen from setvar variables to class variables. (Revised by WL and SN, 23-Aug-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eleq2w2	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem eleq2w2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfcleq 2762	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
2	1	biimpi 219	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
3	2	19.21bi 2231	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1565   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-9 2159  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1807  df-cleq 2761

This theorem is referenced by:  nfceqdf  2927  drnfc1  2950  drnfc2  2951  plngval  29016  r1omhfb  35447  fineqvrep  35449  fineqvpow  35450  fineqvac  35451  r1omhfbregs  35472  fvineqsneu  37944  sge0f1o  46987  f1omoOLD  49556  discthing  50123