Theorem eleq2w2 2735

Description: A weaker version of eleq2 2828 (but stronger than ax-9 2119 and elequ2 2124) that uses ax-12 2174 to avoid ax-8 2111 and df-clel 2817. Compare eleq2w 2823, whose setvars appear where the class variables are in this theorem, and vice versa. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Jun-2019.) Strengthen from setvar variables to class variables. (Revised by WL and SN, 23-Aug-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eleq2w2	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem eleq2w2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfcleq 2732	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
2	1	biimpi 215	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
3	2	19.21bi 2185	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wal 1539   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2109

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1801  ax-4 1815  ax-5 1916  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2014  ax-9 2119  ax-12 2174  ax-ext 2710

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-ex 1786  df-cleq 2731

This theorem is referenced by:  nfceqdf  2903  drnfc1  2927  drnfc2  2929  fineqvrep  33043  fineqvpow  33044  fineqvac  33045  f1omo  46140