Theorem dtrucor3 45760

Description: An example of how ax-5 1918 without a distinct variable condition causes paradox in models of at least two objects. The hypothesis "dtrucor3.1" is provable from dtru 5248 in the ZF set theory. axc16nf 2262 and euae 2660 demonstrate that the violation of dtru 5248 leads to a model with only one object assuming its existence (ax-6 1976). The conclusion is also provable in the empty model ( see emptyal 1916). See also nf5 2285 and nf5i 2148 for the relation between unconditional ax-5 1918 and being not free. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dtrucor3.1	⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
dtrucor3.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dtrucor3	⊢ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dtrucor3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax6ev 1978	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
2		dtrucor3.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
3		dtrucor3.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
4	2, 3	mto 200	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦
5	4	nex 1808	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
6	1, 5	pm2.24ii 120	1 ⊢ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  ∀wal 1541  ∃wex 1787

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-6 1976

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-ex 1788

This theorem is referenced by: (None)