Theorem equncomiVD 42489

Description: Inference form of equncom 4088. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncomi 4089 is equncomiVD 42489 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomiVD 42489.

h1::	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)
qed:1:	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
equncomiVD.1	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equncomiVD	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem equncomiVD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equncomiVD.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)
2		equncom 4088	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
3	2	biimpi 215	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
4	1, 3	e0a 42392	1 ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1539   ∪ cun 3885

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1783  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-v 3434  df-un 3892

This theorem is referenced by: (None)