Theorem equncomiVD 44909

Description: Inference form of equncom 4106. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncomi 4107 is equncomiVD 44909 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomiVD 44909.

h1::	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)
qed:1:	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
equncomiVD.1	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equncomiVD	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem equncomiVD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equncomiVD.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)
2		equncom 4106	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
3	2	biimpi 216	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
4	1, 3	e0a 44812	1 ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1541   ∪ cun 3895

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-v 3438  df-un 3902

This theorem is referenced by: (None)