Theorem equncomiVD 42162

Description: Inference form of equncom 4068. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncomi 4069 is equncomiVD 42162 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomiVD 42162.

h1::	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)
qed:1:	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
equncomiVD.1	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equncomiVD	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem equncomiVD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equncomiVD.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)
2		equncom 4068	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
3	2	biimpi 219	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
4	1, 3	e0a 42065	1 ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1543   ∪ cun 3864

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1976  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 848  df-tru 1546  df-ex 1788  df-sb 2071  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-v 3410  df-un 3871

This theorem is referenced by: (None)