Theorem imbi13VD 39858

Description: Join three logical equivalences to form equivalence of implications. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi13 39494 is imbi13VD 39858 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from imbi13VD 39858.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   )
2::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ▶   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   )
3::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)   ▶   (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)   )
4:2,3:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)   ▶   ((𝜒 → 𝜏) ↔ (𝜃 → 𝜂))   )
5:1,4:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)   ▶   ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))   )
6:5:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ▶   ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))))   )
7:6:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))))   )
qed:7:	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))))))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
imbi13VD	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))))))

Proof of Theorem imbi13VD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idn1 39548	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   )
2		idn2 39596	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ▶   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   )
3		idn3 39598	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)   ▶   (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)   )
4		imbi12 338	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜒 → 𝜏) ↔ (𝜃 → 𝜂))))
5	2, 3, 4	e23 39739	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)   ▶   ((𝜒 → 𝜏) ↔ (𝜃 → 𝜂))   )
6		imbi12 338	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (((𝜒 → 𝜏) ↔ (𝜃 → 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))))
7	1, 5, 6	e13 39732	. . . 4 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)   ▶   ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))   )
8	7	in3 39592	. . 3 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ▶   ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))))   )
9	8	in2 39588	. 2 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))))   )
10	9	in1 39545	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 386  df-3an 1110  df-vd1 39544  df-vd2 39552  df-vd3 39564

This theorem is referenced by: (None)