Theorem iotajust 6315

Description: Soundness justification theorem for df-iota 6316. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iotajust	⊢ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧   𝜑,𝑦   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem iotajust

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sneq 4579	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → {𝑦} = {𝑤})
2	1	eqeq2d 2834	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤}))
3	2	cbvabv 2891	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = {𝑤 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤}}
4		sneq 4579	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → {𝑤} = {𝑧})
5	4	eqeq2d 2834	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤} ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}))
6	5	cbvabv 2891	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤}} = {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}}
7	3, 6	eqtri 2846	. 2 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}}
8	7	unieqi 4853	1 ⊢ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}}

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1537  {cab 2801  {csn 4569  ∪ cuni 4840

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-v 3498  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-sn 4570  df-uni 4841

This theorem is referenced by: (None)