P. 66 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 6501-6600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	onssneli 6501	An ordering law for ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	onssnel2i 6502	An ordering law for ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	onelini 6503	An element of an ordinal number equals the intersection with it. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	oneluni 6504	An ordinal number equals its union with any element. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	onunisuci 6505	An ordinal number is equal to the union of its successor. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ suc 𝐴 = 𝐴
Theorem	onsseli 6506	Subset is equivalent to membership or equality for ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	onun2i 6507	The union of two ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ On
Theorem	unizlim 6508	An ordinal equal to its own union is either zero or a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ Lim 𝐴)))
Theorem	on0eqel 6509	An ordinal number either equals zero or contains zero. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	snsn0non 6510	The singleton of the singleton of the empty set is not an ordinal (nor a natural number by omsson 7890). It can be used to represent an "undefined" value for a partial operation on natural or ordinal numbers. See also onxpdisj 6511. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ¬ {{∅}} ∈ On
Theorem	onxpdisj 6511	Ordinal numbers and ordered pairs are disjoint collections. This theorem can be used if we want to extend a set of ordinal numbers or ordered pairs with disjoint elements. See also snsn0non 6510. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (On ∩ (V × V)) = ∅
Theorem	onnev 6512	The class of ordinal numbers is not equal to the universe. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-May-2024.)
⊢ On ≠ V
2.3.15  Definite description binder (inverted iota)
Syntax	cio 6513	Extend class notation with Russell's definition description binder (inverted iota).
class (℩𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	iotajust 6514*	Soundness justification theorem for df-iota 6515. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}}
Definition	df-iota 6515*	Define Russell's definition description binder, which can be read as "the unique 𝑥 such that 𝜑", where 𝜑 ordinarily contains 𝑥 as a free variable. Our definition is meaningful only when there is exactly one 𝑥 such that 𝜑 is true (see iotaval 6533); otherwise, it evaluates to the empty set (see iotanul 6540). Russell used the inverted iota symbol ℩ to represent the binder. Sometimes proofs need to expand an iota-based definition. That is, given "X = the x for which ... x ... x ..." holds, the proof needs to get to "... X ... X ...". A general strategy to do this is to use riotacl2 7403 (or iotacl 6548 for unbounded iota), as demonstrated in the proof of supub 9496. This can be easier than applying riotasbc 7405 or a version that applies an explicit substitution, because substituting an iota into its own property always has a bound variable clash which must be first renamed or else guarded with NF. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}}
Theorem	dfiota2 6516*	Alternate definition for descriptions. Definition 8.18 in [Quine] p. 56. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)}
Theorem	nfiota1 6517	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	nfiotadw 6518*	Deduction version of nfiotaw 6519. Version of nfiotad 6520 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2013.) Avoid ax-13 2374. (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	nfiotaw 6519*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. Version of nfiota 6521 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2374. (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	nfiotad 6520	Deduction version of nfiota 6521. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use the weaker nfiotadw 6518 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	nfiota 6521	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use the weaker nfiotaw 6519 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	cbviotaw 6522*	Change bound variables in a description binder. Version of cbviota 6524 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2374. (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbviotavw 6523*	Change bound variables in a description binder. Version of cbviotav 6525 with a disjoint variable condition, which requires fewer axioms . (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbviota 6524	Change bound variables in a description binder. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use the weaker cbviotaw 6522 when possible. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbviotav 6525*	Change bound variables in a description binder. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use the weaker cbviotavw 6523 when possible. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	sb8iota 6526	Variable substitution in description binder. Compare sb8eu 2597. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iotaeq 6527	Equality theorem for descriptions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	iotabi 6528	Equivalence theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	uniabio 6529*	Part of Theorem 8.17 in [Quine] p. 56. This theorem serves as a lemma for the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝑦)
Theorem	iotaval2 6530*	Version of iotaval 6533 using df-iota 6515 instead of dfiota2 6516. (Contributed by SN, 6-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} → (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦)
Theorem	iotauni2 6531*	Version of iotauni 6537 using df-iota 6515 instead of dfiota2 6516. (Contributed by SN, 6-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∃𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iotanul2 6532*	Version of iotanul 6540 using df-iota 6515 instead of dfiota2 6516. (Contributed by SN, 6-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅)
Theorem	iotaval 6533*	Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2138, ax-11 2154, ax-12 2174. (Revised by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦)
Theorem	iotassuni 6534	The ℩ class is a subset of the union of all elements satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2138, ax-11 2154, ax-12 2174. (Revised by SN, 6-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) ⊆ ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	iotaex 6535	Theorem 8.23 in [Quine] p. 58. This theorem proves the existence of the ℩ class under our definition. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2138, ax-11 2154, ax-12 2174. (Revised by SN, 6-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V
Theorem	iotavalOLD 6536*	Obsolete version of iotaval 6533 as of 23-Dec-2024. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦)
Theorem	iotauni 6537	Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iotaint 6538	Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iota1 6539	Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑥))
Theorem	iotanul 6540	Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅)
Theorem	iotassuniOLD 6541	Obsolete version of iotassuni 6534 as of 23-Dec-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) ⊆ ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	iotaexOLD 6542	Obsolete version of iotaex 6535 as of 23-Dec-2024. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V
Theorem	iota4 6543	Theorem *14.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iota4an 6544	Theorem *14.23 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → [(℩𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iota5 6545*	A method for computing iota. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐴)
Theorem	iotabidv 6546*	Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜓) = (℩𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	iotabii 6547	Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	iotacl 6548	Membership law for descriptions. This can be useful for expanding an unbounded iota-based definition (see df-iota 6515). If you have a bounded iota-based definition, riotacl2 7403 may be useful. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iota2df 6549	A condition that allows to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵))
Theorem	iota2d 6550*	A condition that allows to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵))
Theorem	iota2 6551*	The unique element such that 𝜑. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝐴))
Theorem	iotan0 6552*	Representation of "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴 which is not the empty set (that means that "the unique element such that 𝜑 " exists). (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = (℩𝑥𝜑)) → 𝜓)
Theorem	sniota 6553	A class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {(℩𝑥𝜑)})
Theorem	dfiota4 6554	The ℩ operation using the if operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 28-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = if(∃!𝑥𝜑, ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}, ∅)
Theorem	csbiota 6555*	Class substitution within a description binder. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.) (Revised by NM, 23-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(℩𝑦𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
2.3.16  Functions
Syntax	wfun 6556	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a function.)
wff Fun 𝐴
Syntax	wfn 6557	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with a domain. (Read: 𝐴 is a function on 𝐵.)
wff 𝐴 Fn 𝐵
Syntax	wf 6558	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with domain and codomain. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 into 𝐵.)
wff 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵
Syntax	wf1 6559	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one into 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵
Syntax	wfo 6560	Extend the definition of a wff to include onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 onto 𝐵.) The notation ("onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵
Syntax	wf1o 6561	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one onto 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵
Syntax	cfv 6562	Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. Read: "the value of 𝐹 at 𝐴", or "𝐹 of 𝐴".
class (𝐹‘𝐴)
Syntax	wiso 6563	Extend the definition of a wff to include the isomorphism property. Read: "𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵".
wff 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)
Definition	df-fun 6564	Define predicate that determines if some class 𝐴 is a function. Definition 10.1 of [Quine] p. 65. For example, the expression Fun cos is true once we define cosine (df-cos 16102). This is not the same as defining a specific function's mapping, which is typically done using the format of cmpt 5230 with the maps-to notation (see df-mpt 5231 and df-mpo 7435). Contrast this predicate with the predicates to determine if some class is a function with a given domain (df-fn 6565), a function with a given domain and codomain (df-f 6566), a one-to-one function (df-f1 6567), an onto function (df-fo 6568), or a one-to-one onto function (df-f1o 6569). For alternate definitions, see dffun2 6572, dffun3 6576, dffun4 6578, dffun5 6579, dffun6 6575, dffun7 6594, dffun8 6595, and dffun9 6596. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∘ ◡𝐴) ⊆ I ))
Definition	df-fn 6565	Define a function with domain. Definition 6.15(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. For alternate definitions, see dffn2 6738, dffn3 6748, dffn4 6826, and dffn5 6966. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 Fn 𝐵 ↔ (Fun 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Definition	df-f 6566	Define a function (mapping) with domain and codomain. Definition 6.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 can be read as "𝐹 is a function from 𝐴 to 𝐵". For alternate definitions, see dff2 7118, dff3 7119, and dff4 7120. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐵))
Definition	df-f1 6567	Define a one-to-one function. For equivalent definitions see dff12 6803 and dff13 7274. Compare Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow). A one-to-one function is also called an "injection" or an "injective function", 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 can be read as "𝐹 is an injection from 𝐴 into 𝐵". Injections are precisely the monomorphisms in the category SetCat of sets and set functions, see setcmon 18140. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹))
Definition	df-fo 6568	Define an onto function. Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("onto" under the arrow). For alternate definitions, see dffo2 6824, dffo3 7121, dffo4 7122, and dffo5 7123. An onto function is also called a "surjection" or a "surjective function", 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 can be read as "𝐹 is a surjection from 𝐴 onto 𝐵". Surjections are precisely the epimorphisms in the category SetCat of sets and set functions, see setcepi 18141. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐵))
Definition	df-f1o 6569	Define a one-to-one onto function. For equivalent definitions see dff1o2 6853, dff1o3 6854, dff1o4 6856, and dff1o5 6857. Compare Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow). A one-to-one onto function is also called a "bijection" or a "bijective function", 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 can be read as "𝐹 is a bijection between 𝐴 and 𝐵". Bijections are precisely the isomorphisms in the category SetCat of sets and set functions, see setciso 18144. Therefore, two sets are called "isomorphic" if there is a bijection between them. According to isof1oidb 7343, two sets are isomorphic iff there is an isomorphism Isom regarding the identity relation. In this case, the two sets are also "equinumerous", see bren 8993. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵))
Definition	df-fv 6570*	Define the value of a function, (𝐹‘𝐴), also known as function application. For example, (cos‘0) = 1 (we prove this in cos0 16182 after we define cosine in df-cos 16102). Typically, function 𝐹 is defined using maps-to notation (see df-mpt 5231 and df-mpo 7435), but this is not required. For example, 𝐹 = {⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} → (𝐹‘3) = 9 (ex-fv 30471). Note that df-ov 7433 will define two-argument functions using ordered pairs as (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐹‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩). This particular definition is quite convenient: it can be applied to any class and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful (as shown by ndmfv 6941 and fvprc 6898). The left apostrophe notation originated with Peano and was adopted in Definition *30.01 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 235, Definition 10.11 of [Quine] p. 68, and Definition 6.11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. It means the same thing as the more familiar 𝐹(𝐴) notation for a function's value at 𝐴, i.e., "𝐹 of 𝐴", but without context-dependent notational ambiguity. Alternate definitions are dffv2 7003, dffv3 6902, fv2 6901, and fv3 6924 (the latter two previously required 𝐴 to be a set.) Restricted equivalents that require 𝐹 to be a function are shown in funfv 6995 and funfv2 6996. For the familiar definition of function value in terms of ordered pair membership, see funopfvb 6962. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) Revised to use ℩. Original version is now Theorem dffv4 6903. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) = (℩𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥)
Definition	df-isom 6571*	Define the isomorphism predicate. We read this as "𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵". Normally, 𝑅 and 𝑆 are ordering relations on 𝐴 and 𝐵 respectively. Definition 6.28 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 32, whose notation is the same as ours except that 𝑅 and 𝑆 are subscripts. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝐻‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐻‘𝑦))))
Theorem	dffun2 6572*	Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) Avoid ax-10 2138, ax-12 2174. (Revised by SN, 19-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2154. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑥𝐴𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun2OLD 6573*	Obsolete version of dffun2 6572 as of 29-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) Avoid ax-10 2138, ax-12 2174. (Revised by SN, 19-Dec-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑥𝐴𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun2OLDOLD 6574*	Obsolete version of dffun2 6572 as of 11-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑥𝐴𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun6 6575*	Alternate definition of a function using "at most one" notation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) Avoid ax-10 2138, ax-12 2174. (Revised by SN, 19-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ (Rel 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
Theorem	dffun3 6576*	Alternate definition of function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun3OLD 6577*	Obsolete version of dffun3 6576 as of 19-Dec-2024. Alternate definition of function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun4 6578*	Alternate definition of a function. Definition 6.4(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun5 6579*	Alternate definition of function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun6f 6580*	Definition of function, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	dffun6OLD 6581*	Obsolete version of dffun6 6575 as of 19-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ (Rel 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
Theorem	funmo 6582*	A function has at most one value for each argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∃*𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	funmoOLD 6583*	Obsolete version of funmo 6582 as of 19-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∃*𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	funrel 6584	A function is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 → Rel 𝐴)
Theorem	0nelfun 6585	A function does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by BJ, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (Fun 𝑅 → ∅ ∉ 𝑅)
Theorem	funss 6586	Subclass theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐵 → Fun 𝐴))
Theorem	funeq 6587	Equality theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵))
Theorem	funeqi 6588	Equality inference for the function predicate. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵)
Theorem	funeqd 6589	Equality deduction for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵))
Theorem	nffun 6590	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a function. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Fun 𝐹
Theorem	sbcfung 6591	Distribute proper substitution through the function predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹))
Theorem	funeu 6592*	There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴𝐹𝐵) → ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	funeu2 6593*	There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝐹) → ∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹)
Theorem	dffun7 6594*	Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. (Enderton's definition is ambiguous because "there is only one" could mean either "there is at most one" or "there is exactly one". However, dffun8 6595 shows that it does not matter which meaning we pick.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	dffun8 6595*	Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. Compare dffun7 6594. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	dffun9 6596*	Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2007.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃*𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐴 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	funfn 6597	A class is a function if and only if it is a function on its domain. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 Fn dom 𝐴)
Theorem	funfnd 6598	A function is a function on its domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 Fn dom 𝐴)
Theorem	funi 6599	The identity relation is a function. Part of Theorem 10.4 of [Quine] p. 65. See also idfn 6696. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.)
⊢ Fun I
Theorem	nfunv 6600	The universal class is not a function. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 27-Jan-2004.)
⊢ ¬ Fun V