Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > nfra2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Similar to Lemma 24 of [Monk2] p. 114, except the quantification of the antecedent is restricted. Derived automatically from hbra2VD 41201. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2390. Use the weaker nfra2w 3229 when possible. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nfra2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | nfcv 2979 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 | |
2 | nfra1 3221 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 | |
3 | 1, 2 | nfral 3228 | 1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: Ⅎwnf 1784 ∀wral 3140 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2145 ax-11 2161 ax-12 2177 ax-13 2390 ax-ext 2795 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-cleq 2816 df-clel 2895 df-nfc 2965 df-ral 3145 |
This theorem is referenced by: ralcom2 3365 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |