Theorem nfra2 3360

Description: Similar to Lemma 24 of [Monk2] p. 114, except the quantification of the antecedent is restricted. Derived automatically from hbra2VD 44851. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2377. Use the weaker nfra2w 3284 when possible. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfra2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑

Distinct variable group:   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfra2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcv 2899	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
2		nfra1 3270	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
3	1, 2	nfral 3358	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑

Syntax hints:  Ⅎwnf 1783  ∀wral 3052

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-13 2377  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2886  df-ral 3053

This theorem is referenced by:  ralcom2  3361