Theorem nfra2 3369

Description: Similar to Lemma 24 of [Monk2] p. 114, except the quantification of the antecedent is restricted. Derived automatically from hbra2VD 44299. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2367. Use the weaker nfra2w 3293 when possible. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfra2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑

Distinct variable group:   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfra2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcv 2899	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
2		nfra1 3278	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
3	1, 2	nfral 3367	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑

Syntax hints:  Ⅎwnf 1778  ∀wral 3058

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-10 2130  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2167  ax-13 2367  ax-ext 2699

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-tru 1537  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ral 3059

This theorem is referenced by:  ralcom2  3370