Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > nfra2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Similar to Lemma 24 of [Monk2] p. 114, except the quantification of the antecedent is restricted. Derived automatically from hbra2VD 42480. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker nfra2w 3154 when possible. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nfra2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | nfcv 2907 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 | |
2 | nfra1 3144 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 | |
3 | 1, 2 | nfral 3153 | 1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: Ⅎwnf 1786 ∀wral 3064 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2137 ax-11 2154 ax-12 2171 ax-13 2372 ax-ext 2709 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 845 df-tru 1542 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2889 df-ral 3069 |
This theorem is referenced by: ralcom2 3290 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |