MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  nfra2w Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem nfra2w 3298
Description: Similar to Lemma 24 of [Monk2] p. 114, except that quantification is restricted. Once derived from hbra2VD 44885. Version of nfra2 3375 with a disjoint variable condition not requiring ax-13 2376. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 24-Sep-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Jan-2025.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
nfra2w 𝑦𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 𝜑
Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝑦
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfra2w
StepHypRef Expression
1 r2al 3194 . 2 (∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦((𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵) → 𝜑))
2 nfa2 2175 . 2 𝑦𝑥𝑦((𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵) → 𝜑)
31, 2nfxfr 1852 1 𝑦𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 𝜑
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 395  wal 1537  wnf 1782  wcel 2107  wral 3060
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-10 2140  ax-11 2156
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-ex 1779  df-nf 1783  df-ral 3061
This theorem is referenced by:  invdisj  5128  reusv3  5404  dedekind  11425  dedekindle  11426  mreexexd  17692  gsummatr01lem4  22665  ordtconnlem1  33924  bnj1379  34845  tratrb  44561  islptre  45639  sprsymrelfo  47489
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator