Theorem nfra2w 3297

Description: Similar to Lemma 24 of [Monk2] p. 114, except that quantification is restricted. Once derived from hbra2VD 44858. Version of nfra2 3374 with a disjoint variable condition not requiring ax-13 2375. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 24-Sep-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Jan-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfra2w	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfra2w

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r2al 3193	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
2		nfa2 2174	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑)
3	1, 2	nfxfr 1850	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1535  Ⅎwnf 1780   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3059

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-ral 3060

This theorem is referenced by:  invdisj  5134  reusv3  5411  dedekind  11422  dedekindle  11423  mreexexd  17693  gsummatr01lem4  22680  ordtconnlem1  33885  bnj1379  34823  tratrb  44534  islptre  45575  sprsymrelfo  47422