Theorem rabeqcda 3455

Description: When 𝜓 is always true in a context, a restricted class abstraction is equal to the restricting class. Deduction form of rabeqc 3456. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rabeqcda.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqcda	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rabeqcda

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 3444	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
2		rabeqcda.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)
3	2	ex 412	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))
4	3	pm4.71d 561	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
5	4	eqabdv 2878	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)})
6	1, 5	eqtr4id 2799	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  {cab 2717  {crab 3443

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1778  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-rab 3444

This theorem is referenced by:  rabeqc  3456  cmnbascntr  19847  lrold  27953  unitscyglem4  42155  prjcrv0  42588  isubgrvtxuhgr  47736  mreclat  48669