Theorem rabeqcda 3423

Description: When 𝜓 is always true in a context, a restricted class abstraction is equal to the restricting class. Deduction form of rabeqc 3424. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rabeqcda.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqcda	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rabeqcda

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 3413	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
2		rabeqcda.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)
3	2	ex 418	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))
4	3	pm4.71d 571	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
5	4	eqabdv 2893	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)})
6	1, 5	eqtr4id 2814	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2738  {crab 3412

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-rab 3413

This theorem is used by:  rabeqc  3424  chnfi  18769  cmnbascntr  19980  lrold  28216  0mplrim  34079  unitscyglem4  43168  prjcrv0  43583  isubgrvtxuhgr  48884  stgrnbgr0  48984  mreclat  50027