Theorem rabeqcda 3404

Description: When 𝜓 is always true in a context, a restricted class abstraction is equal to the restricting class. Deduction form of rabeqc 3405. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rabeqcda.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqcda	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rabeqcda

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 3394	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
2		rabeqcda.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)
3	2	ex 414	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))
4	3	pm4.71d 567	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
5	4	eqabdv 2874	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)})
6	1, 5	eqtr4id 2795	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1548   ∈ wcel 2121  {cab 2719  {crab 3393

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2123  ax-9 2131  ax-ext 2713

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-ex 1788  df-sb 2075  df-clab 2720  df-cleq 2733  df-clel 2816  df-rab 3394

This theorem is referenced by:  rabeqc  3405  chnfi  18595  cmnbascntr  19775  lrold  27911  0mplrim  33710  unitscyglem4  42698  prjcrv0  43098  isubgrvtxuhgr  48369  stgrnbgr0  48469  mreclat  49501