Theorem rabeqcda 3426

Description: When 𝜓 is always true in a context, a restricted class abstraction is equal to the restricting class. Deduction form of rabeqc 3427. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rabeqcda.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqcda	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rabeqcda

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 3416	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
2		rabeqcda.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)
3	2	ex 417	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))
4	3	pm4.71d 570	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
5	4	eqabdv 2895	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)})
6	1, 5	eqtr4id 2816	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  {cab 2740  {crab 3415

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1809  df-sb 2096  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-rab 3416

This theorem is used by:  rabeqc  3427  chnfi  18696  cmnbascntr  19881  lrold  28101  0mplrim  33913  unitscyglem4  42993  prjcrv0  43393  isubgrvtxuhgr  48657  stgrnbgr0  48757  mreclat  49803