| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rspc2dv | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: 2-variable restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rspc2dv.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) |
| rspc2dv.2 | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| rspc2dv.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜓) |
| rspc2dv.4 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) |
| rspc2dv.5 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rspc2dv | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rspc2dv.4 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | |
| 2 | rspc2dv.5 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) | |
| 3 | rspc2dv.3 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜓) | |
| 4 | rspc2dv.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
| 5 | rspc2dv.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | rspc2va 3602 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| 7 | 1, 2, 3, 6 | syl21anc 850 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 = wceq 1567 ∈ wcel 2149 ∀wral 3085 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1822 ax-4 1836 ax-5 1937 ax-6 1994 ax-7 2035 ax-8 2151 ax-9 2159 ax-ext 2741 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-tru 1570 df-ex 1807 df-sb 2098 df-clab 2748 df-cleq 2761 df-clel 2844 df-ral 3086 |
| This theorem is referenced by: prmidlprop 21445 mulscom 28298 addsdilem3 28312 addsdilem4 28313 mulsasslem3 28324 rprmdvds 33754 mplvrpmga 33880 vieta 33915 cvxsconn 35634 nmulprop 36581 nmulcom 36585 oppcmndclem 49680 ssccatid 49735 termcbasmo 50146 fulltermc2 50175 arweuthinc 50192 arweutermc 50193 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |