| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rspc2dv | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: 2-variable restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rspc2dv.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) |
| rspc2dv.2 | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| rspc2dv.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜓) |
| rspc2dv.4 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) |
| rspc2dv.5 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rspc2dv | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rspc2dv.4 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | |
| 2 | rspc2dv.5 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) | |
| 3 | rspc2dv.3 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜓) | |
| 4 | rspc2dv.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
| 5 | rspc2dv.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | rspc2va 3593 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| 7 | 1, 2, 3, 6 | syl21anc 850 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2143 ∀wral 3079 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1825 ax-4 1839 ax-5 1940 ax-6 1997 ax-7 2038 ax-8 2145 ax-9 2153 ax-ext 2735 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-tru 1573 df-ex 1810 df-sb 2097 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2838 df-ral 3080 |
| This theorem is referenced by: prmidlprop 21476 mulscom 28332 addsdilem3 28346 addsdilem4 28347 mulsasslem3 28358 rprmdvds 33809 mplvrpmga 33935 vieta 33970 cvxsconn 35735 nmulprop 36682 nmulcom 36686 nadddilem1 36712 nadddilem3 36714 oppcmndclem 49815 ssccatid 49870 termcbasmo 50281 fulltermc2 50310 arweuthinc 50327 arweutermc 50328 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |