Theorem sbal 2166

Description: Move universal quantifier in and out of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Sep-2018.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 13-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbal	⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem sbal

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		alcom 2163	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑤∀𝑥(𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑤(𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
2		19.21v 1940	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
3	2	albii 1820	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
4		alcom 2163	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑))
5	3, 4	bitr3i 279	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑))
6	5	imbi2i 338	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
7	6	albii 1820	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑤(𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
8		df-sb 2070	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑥𝜑)))
9		19.21v 1940	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
10	9	albii 1820	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑤∀𝑥(𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
11	7, 8, 10	3bitr4i 305	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑤∀𝑥(𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
12		df-sb 2070	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
13	12	albii 1820	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑤(𝑤 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
14	1, 11, 13	3bitr4i 305	1 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208  ∀wal 1535  [wsb 2069

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-11 2161

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2070

This theorem is referenced by:  sbalv  2167  sbcal  3835  ax11-pm2  34161  bj-sbnf  34166  ichal  43634