Theorem sbcom3 2536

Description: Substituting 𝑦 for 𝑥 and then 𝑧 for 𝑦 is equivalent to substituting 𝑧 for both 𝑥 and 𝑦. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. For a version requiring a disjoint variable, but fewer axioms, see sbcom3vv 2130. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 8-Apr-2018.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2190. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 16-Sep-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcom3	⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)

Proof of Theorem sbcom3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfa1 2184	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧
2		drsb2 2300	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
3	1, 2	sbbid 2280	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
4		sb4b 2505	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
5		sbequ 2115	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
6	5	pm5.74i 273	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
7	6	albii 1838	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
8	4, 7	bitrdi 289	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
9		sb4b 2505	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
10	8, 9	bitr4d 284	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
11	3, 10	pm2.61i 183	1 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208  ∀wal 1557  [wsb 2089

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-10 2174  ax-12 2211  ax-13 2402

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-ex 1799  df-nf 1803  df-sb 2090

This theorem is referenced by:  sbco  2537  sbidm  2540  sbcom  2544