Theorem sbcom3 2473

Description: Substituting 𝑦 for 𝑥 and then 𝑧 for 𝑦 is equivalent to substituting 𝑧 for both 𝑥 and 𝑦. For a version requiring disjoint variables, but fewer axioms, see sbcom3vv 2043. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 8-Apr-2018.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2094. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 16-Sep-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Sep-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcom3	⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)

Proof of Theorem sbcom3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfa1 2089	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧
2		drsb2 2194	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
3	1, 2	sbbid 2174	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
4		sb4b 2424	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
5		sbequ 2036	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
6	5	pm5.74i 263	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
7	6	albii 1783	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
8	4, 7	syl6bb 279	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
9		sb4b 2424	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
10	8, 9	bitr4d 274	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
11	3, 10	pm2.61i 177	1 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198  ∀wal 1506  [wsb 2016

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1759  ax-4 1773  ax-5 1870  ax-6 1929  ax-7 1966  ax-10 2080  ax-12 2107  ax-13 2302

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 388  df-or 835  df-ex 1744  df-nf 1748  df-sb 2017

This theorem is referenced by:  sbco  2474  sbidm  2477  sbcom  2481