Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > sbel2x | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Elimination of double substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
sbel2x | ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑤][𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | nfv 1922 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 | |
2 | nfv 1922 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | |
3 | 1, 2 | 2sb5rf 2471 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥((𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑤][𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑)) |
4 | ancom 464 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)) | |
5 | 4 | anbi1i 627 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑤][𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑤][𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑)) |
6 | 5 | 2exbii 1856 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑥((𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑤][𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑤][𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑)) |
7 | excom 2168 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑤][𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑤][𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑)) | |
8 | 3, 6, 7 | 3bitri 300 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑤][𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 399 ∃wex 1787 [wsb 2072 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1803 ax-4 1817 ax-5 1918 ax-6 1976 ax-7 2018 ax-10 2143 ax-11 2160 ax-12 2177 ax-13 2371 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 848 df-tru 1546 df-ex 1788 df-nf 1792 df-sb 2073 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |