| Description: If 𝜑 is a theorem, then any set
belongs to the class
{𝑥
∣ 𝜑}.
Therefore, {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} is "a" universal class.
This is the closest one can get to defining a universal class, or
proving vex 3475, without using ax-ext 2698. Note that this theorem has no
disjoint variable condition and does not use df-clel 2805 nor df-cleq 2719
either: only propositional logic and ax-gen 1789 and df-clab 2705. This is
sbt 2061 expressed using class abstractions.
Without ax-ext 2698, one cannot define "the" universal
class, since one
could not prove for instance the justification theorem
{𝑥
∣ ⊤} = {𝑦
∣ ⊤} (see vjust 3472). Indeed, in order to prove
any equality of classes, one needs df-cleq 2719, which has ax-ext 2698 as a
hypothesis. Therefore, the classes {𝑥 ∣ ⊤},
{𝑦
∣ (𝜑 → 𝜑)}, {𝑧 ∣ (∀𝑡𝑡 = 𝑡 → ∀𝑡𝑡 = 𝑡)} and
countless others are all universal classes whose equality cannot be
proved without ax-ext 2698. Once dfcleq 2720 is available, we will define
"the" universal class in df-v 3473.
Its degenerate instance is also a simple consequence of abid 2708
(using
mpbir 230). (Contributed by BJ, 13-Jun-2019.) Reduce
axiom
dependencies. (Revised by Steven Nguyen,
25-Apr-2023.) |
