Theorem eximdh 1611

Description: Deduction from Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1996.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eximdh.1	|- ( ph -> A. x ph )
eximdh.2	|- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eximdh	|- ( ph -> ( E. x ps -> E. x ch ) )

Proof of Theorem eximdh

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eximdh.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. x ph )
2		eximdh.2	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) )
3	1, 2	alrimih 1469	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x ( ps -> ch ) )
4		exim 1599	. 2 |- ( A. x ( ps -> ch ) -> ( E. x ps -> E. x ch ) )
5	3, 4	syl 14	1 |- ( ph -> ( E. x ps -> E. x ch ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   A.wal 1351   E.wex 1492

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1447  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-4 1510  ax-ial 1534

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117

This theorem is referenced by:  eximd  1612  19.41h  1685  hbexd  1694  equsex  1728  equsexd  1729  spimeh  1739  sbiedh  1787  exdistrfor  1800  eximdv  1880  cbvexdh  1926  mopick2  2109  2euex  2113  bj-sbimedh  14608