Theorem mopick2 2137

Description: "At most one" can show the existence of a common value. In this case we can infer existence of conjunction from a conjunction of existence, and it is one way to achieve the converse of 19.40 1654. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mopick2	|- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) /\ E. x ( ph /\ ch ) ) -> E. x ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) )

Proof of Theorem mopick2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		hbmo1 2092	. . . 4 |- ( E* x ph -> A. x E* x ph )
2		hbe1 1518	. . . 4 |- ( E. x ( ph /\ ps ) -> A. x E. x ( ph /\ ps ) )
3	1, 2	hban 1570	. . 3 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> A. x ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) )
4		mopick 2132	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> ( ph -> ps ) )
5	4	ancld 325	. . . . 5 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> ( ph -> ( ph /\ ps ) ) )
6	5	anim1d 336	. . . 4 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> ( ( ph /\ ch ) -> ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ ch ) ) )
7		df-3an 983	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ ch ) )
8	6, 7	imbitrrdi 162	. . 3 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> ( ( ph /\ ch ) -> ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) ) )
9	3, 8	eximdh 1634	. 2 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> ( E. x ( ph /\ ch ) -> E. x ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) ) )
10	9	3impia 1203	1 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) /\ E. x ( ph /\ ch ) ) -> E. x ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   /\ w3a 981   E.wex 1515   E*wmo 2055

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1470  ax-7 1471  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-8 1527  ax-10 1528  ax-11 1529  ax-i12 1530  ax-bndl 1532  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-i9 1553  ax-ial 1557  ax-i5r 1558

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-nf 1484  df-sb 1786  df-eu 2057  df-mo 2058

This theorem is referenced by: (None)