Theorem mopick2 2125

Description: "At most one" can show the existence of a common value. In this case we can infer existence of conjunction from a conjunction of existence, and it is one way to achieve the converse of 19.40 1642. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mopick2	|- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) /\ E. x ( ph /\ ch ) ) -> E. x ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) )

Proof of Theorem mopick2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		hbmo1 2080	. . . 4 |- ( E* x ph -> A. x E* x ph )
2		hbe1 1506	. . . 4 |- ( E. x ( ph /\ ps ) -> A. x E. x ( ph /\ ps ) )
3	1, 2	hban 1558	. . 3 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> A. x ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) )
4		mopick 2120	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> ( ph -> ps ) )
5	4	ancld 325	. . . . 5 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> ( ph -> ( ph /\ ps ) ) )
6	5	anim1d 336	. . . 4 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> ( ( ph /\ ch ) -> ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ ch ) ) )
7		df-3an 982	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ ch ) )
8	6, 7	imbitrrdi 162	. . 3 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> ( ( ph /\ ch ) -> ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) ) )
9	3, 8	eximdh 1622	. 2 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> ( E. x ( ph /\ ch ) -> E. x ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) ) )
10	9	3impia 1202	1 |- ( ( E* x ph /\ E. x ( ph /\ ps ) /\ E. x ( ph /\ ch ) ) -> E. x ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   /\ w3a 980   E.wex 1503   E*wmo 2043

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046

This theorem is referenced by: (None)