Theorem oprabbidv 5942

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal operation class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
oprabbidv.1	|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oprabbidv	|- ( ph -> { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ch } )

Distinct variable groups:   x, z, ph   y, z, ph

Allowed substitution hints:   ps( x, y, z)   ch( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem oprabbidv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1538	. 2 |- F/ x ph
2		nfv 1538	. 2 |- F/ y ph
3		nfv 1538	. 2 |- F/ z ph
4		oprabbidv.1	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
5	1, 2, 3, 4	oprabbid 5941	1 |- ( ph -> { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ch } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1363   {coprab 5889

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1457  ax-7 1458  ax-gen 1459  ax-ie1 1503  ax-ie2 1504  ax-8 1514  ax-11 1516  ax-4 1520  ax-17 1536  ax-i9 1540  ax-ial 1544  ax-i5r 1545  ax-ext 2169

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1366  df-nf 1471  df-sb 1773  df-clab 2174  df-cleq 2180  df-oprab 5892

This theorem is referenced by:  oprabbii  5943  mpoeq123dva  5949  mpoeq3dva  5952  resoprab2  5985  erovlem  6641