Theorem resoprab2 6128

Description: Restriction of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
resoprab2	|- ( ( C C_ A /\ D C_ B ) -> ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) } |` ( C X. D ) ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ph ) } )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A, y, z   x, B, y, z   x, C, y, z   x, D, y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem resoprab2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resoprab 6127	. 2 |- ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) } |` ( C X. D ) ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) }
2		anass 401	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) /\ ph ) <-> ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
3		an4 588	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) <-> ( ( x e. C /\ x e. A ) /\ ( y e. D /\ y e. B ) ) )
4		ssel 3222	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( C C_ A -> ( x e. C -> x e. A ) )
5	4	pm4.71d 393	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( C C_ A -> ( x e. C <-> ( x e. C /\ x e. A ) ) )
6	5	bicomd 141	. . . . . . 7 |- ( C C_ A -> ( ( x e. C /\ x e. A ) <-> x e. C ) )
7		ssel 3222	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( D C_ B -> ( y e. D -> y e. B ) )
8	7	pm4.71d 393	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( D C_ B -> ( y e. D <-> ( y e. D /\ y e. B ) ) )
9	8	bicomd 141	. . . . . . 7 |- ( D C_ B -> ( ( y e. D /\ y e. B ) <-> y e. D ) )
10	6, 9	bi2anan9 610	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( C C_ A /\ D C_ B ) -> ( ( ( x e. C /\ x e. A ) /\ ( y e. D /\ y e. B ) ) <-> ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) ) )
11	3, 10	bitrid 192	. . . . 5 |- ( ( C C_ A /\ D C_ B ) -> ( ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) <-> ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) ) )
12	11	anbi1d 465	. . . 4 |- ( ( C C_ A /\ D C_ B ) -> ( ( ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) /\ ph ) <-> ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ph ) ) )
13	2, 12	bitr3id 194	. . 3 |- ( ( C C_ A /\ D C_ B ) -> ( ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) <-> ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ph ) ) )
14	13	oprabbidv 6085	. 2 |- ( ( C C_ A /\ D C_ B ) -> { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ph ) } )
15	1, 14	eqtrid 2276	1 |- ( ( C C_ A /\ D C_ B ) -> ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) } |` ( C X. D ) ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ph ) } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1398   e. wcel 2202   C_ wss 3201   X. cxp 4729   |` cres 4733   {coprab 6029

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4212  ax-pow 4270  ax-pr 4305

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-ral 2516  df-rex 2517  df-v 2805  df-un 3205  df-in 3207  df-ss 3214  df-pw 3658  df-sn 3679  df-pr 3680  df-op 3682  df-opab 4156  df-xp 4737  df-rel 4738  df-res 4743  df-oprab 6032

This theorem is referenced by:  resmpo  6129