ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  resoprab2 Unicode version

Theorem resoprab2 5675
Description: Restriction of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
resoprab2  |-  ( ( C  C_  A  /\  D  C_  B )  -> 
( { <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z
>.  |  ( (
x  e.  A  /\  y  e.  B )  /\  ph ) }  |`  ( C  X.  D ) )  =  { <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z
>.  |  ( (
x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  ph ) } )
Distinct variable groups:    x, A, y, z    x, B, y, z    x, C, y, z    x, D, y, z
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem resoprab2
StepHypRef Expression
1 resoprab 5674 . 2  |-  ( {
<. <. x ,  y
>. ,  z >.  |  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  y  e.  B )  /\  ph ) }  |`  ( C  X.  D ) )  =  { <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z
>.  |  ( (
x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  y  e.  B )  /\  ph ) ) }
2 anass 393 . . . 4  |-  ( ( ( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  (
x  e.  A  /\  y  e.  B )
)  /\  ph )  <->  ( (
x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  y  e.  B )  /\  ph ) ) )
3 an4 551 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D
)  /\  ( x  e.  A  /\  y  e.  B ) )  <->  ( (
x  e.  C  /\  x  e.  A )  /\  ( y  e.  D  /\  y  e.  B
) ) )
4 ssel 3004 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( C 
C_  A  ->  (
x  e.  C  ->  x  e.  A )
)
54pm4.71d 385 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( C 
C_  A  ->  (
x  e.  C  <->  ( x  e.  C  /\  x  e.  A ) ) )
65bicomd 139 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( C 
C_  A  ->  (
( x  e.  C  /\  x  e.  A
)  <->  x  e.  C
) )
7 ssel 3004 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( D 
C_  B  ->  (
y  e.  D  -> 
y  e.  B ) )
87pm4.71d 385 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( D 
C_  B  ->  (
y  e.  D  <->  ( y  e.  D  /\  y  e.  B ) ) )
98bicomd 139 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( D 
C_  B  ->  (
( y  e.  D  /\  y  e.  B
)  <->  y  e.  D
) )
106, 9bi2anan9 571 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( C  C_  A  /\  D  C_  B )  -> 
( ( ( x  e.  C  /\  x  e.  A )  /\  (
y  e.  D  /\  y  e.  B )
)  <->  ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) ) )
113, 10syl5bb 190 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( C  C_  A  /\  D  C_  B )  -> 
( ( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  (
x  e.  A  /\  y  e.  B )
)  <->  ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) ) )
1211anbi1d 453 . . . 4  |-  ( ( C  C_  A  /\  D  C_  B )  -> 
( ( ( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  ( x  e.  A  /\  y  e.  B
) )  /\  ph ) 
<->  ( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  ph ) ) )
132, 12syl5bbr 192 . . 3  |-  ( ( C  C_  A  /\  D  C_  B )  -> 
( ( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  (
( x  e.  A  /\  y  e.  B
)  /\  ph ) )  <-> 
( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  ph ) ) )
1413oprabbidv 5636 . 2  |-  ( ( C  C_  A  /\  D  C_  B )  ->  { <. <. x ,  y
>. ,  z >.  |  ( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  (
( x  e.  A  /\  y  e.  B
)  /\  ph ) ) }  =  { <. <.
x ,  y >. ,  z >.  |  ( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D
)  /\  ph ) } )
151, 14syl5eq 2127 1  |-  ( ( C  C_  A  /\  D  C_  B )  -> 
( { <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z
>.  |  ( (
x  e.  A  /\  y  e.  B )  /\  ph ) }  |`  ( C  X.  D ) )  =  { <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z
>.  |  ( (
x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  ph ) } )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 102    = wceq 1285    e. wcel 1434    C_ wss 2984    X. cxp 4397    |` cres 4401   {coprab 5590
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-14 1446  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2065  ax-sep 3922  ax-pow 3974  ax-pr 3999
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 922  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1688  df-clab 2070  df-cleq 2076  df-clel 2079  df-nfc 2212  df-ral 2358  df-rex 2359  df-v 2614  df-un 2988  df-in 2990  df-ss 2997  df-pw 3408  df-sn 3428  df-pr 3429  df-op 3431  df-opab 3866  df-xp 4405  df-rel 4406  df-res 4411  df-oprab 5593
This theorem is referenced by:  resmpt2  5676
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator