P. 60 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 5901-6000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	f1dmex 5901	If the codomain of a one-to-one function exists, so does its domain. This can be thought of as a form of the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
|- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. _V )
Theorem	abrexex 5902*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. x is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for B, which can be thought of as B ( x ). This simple-looking theorem is actually quite powerful and appears to involve the Axiom of Replacement in an intrinsic way, as can be seen by tracing back through the path mptexg 5536, funex 5534, fnex 5533, resfunexg 5532, and funimaexg 5111. See also abrexex2 5909. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x e. A y = B } e. _V
Theorem	abrexexg 5903*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. The antecedent assures us that A is a set. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> { y | E. x e. A y = B } e. _V )
Theorem	iunexg 5904*	The existence of an indexed union. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A B e. W ) -> U_ x e. A B e. _V )
Theorem	abrexex2g 5905*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A { y | ph } e. W ) -> { y | E. x e. A ph } e. _V )
Theorem	opabex3d 5906*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> { y | ps } e. _V )   =>    |- ( ph -> { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } e. _V )
Theorem	opabex3 5907*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> { y | ph } e. _V )   =>    |- { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } e. _V
Theorem	iunex 5908*	The existence of an indexed union. x is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for B, which can be read informally as B ( x ). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- U_ x e. A B e. _V
Theorem	abrexex2 5909*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. ph is normally has free-variable parameters x and y. See also abrexex 5902. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x e. A ph } e. _V
Theorem	abexssex 5910*	Existence of a class abstraction with an existentially quantified expression. Both x and y can be free in ph. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x ( x C_ A /\ ph ) } e. _V
Theorem	abexex 5911*	A condition where a class builder continues to exist after its wff is existentially quantified. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2007.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( ph -> x e. A )   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x ph } e. _V
Theorem	oprabexd 5912*	Existence of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> E* z ps )   &    |- ( ph -> F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) } )   =>    |- ( ph -> F e. _V )
Theorem	oprabex 5913*	Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> E* z ph )   &    |- F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }   =>    |- F e. _V
Theorem	oprabex3 5914*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- H e. _V   &    |- F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( H X. H ) /\ y e. ( H X. H ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = R ) ) }   =>    |- F e. _V
Theorem	oprabrexex2 5915*	Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. w e. A ph } e. _V
Theorem	ab2rexex 5916*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. Variables x and y are normally free-variable parameters in the class expression substituted for C, which can be thought of as C ( x , y ). See comments for abrexex 5902. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- { z | E. x e. A E. y e. B z = C } e. _V
Theorem	ab2rexex2 5917*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. ph normally has free-variable parameters x, y, and z. Compare abrexex2 5909. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- { z | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { z | E. x e. A E. y e. B ph } e. _V
Theorem	xpexgALT 5918	The cross product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. This version is proven using Replacement; see xpexg 4565 for a version that uses the Power Set axiom instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A X. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	offval3 5919*	General value of ( F oF R G ) with no assumptions on functionality of F and G. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ G e. W ) -> ( F oF R G ) = ( x e. ( dom F i^i dom G ) |-> ( ( F ` x ) R ( G ` x ) ) ) )
Theorem	offres 5920	Pointwise combination commutes with restriction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ G e. W ) -> ( ( F oF R G ) |` D ) = ( ( F |` D ) oF R ( G |` D ) ) )
Theorem	ofmres 5921*	Equivalent expressions for a restriction of the function operation map. Unlike oF R which is a proper class, ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) can be a set by ofmresex 5922, allowing it to be used as a function or structure argument. By ofmresval 5881, the restricted operation map values are the same as the original values, allowing theorems for oF R to be reused. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
|- ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) = ( f e. A , g e. B |-> ( f oF R g ) )
Theorem	ofmresex 5922	Existence of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) e. _V )
2.6.14  First and second members of an ordered pair
Syntax	c1st 5923	Extend the definition of a class to include the first member an ordered pair function.
class 1st
Syntax	c2nd 5924	Extend the definition of a class to include the second member an ordered pair function.
class 2nd
Definition	df-1st 5925	Define a function that extracts the first member, or abscissa, of an ordered pair. Theorem op1st 5931 proves that it does this. For example, ( 1st ` <. 3 , 4 >.) = 3 . Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op1sta 4925 and op1stb 4313). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- 1st = ( x e. _V |-> U. dom { x } )
Definition	df-2nd 5926	Define a function that extracts the second member, or ordinate, of an ordered pair. Theorem op2nd 5932 proves that it does this. For example, ( 2nd ` <. 3 , 4 >.) = 4 . Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op2nda 4928 and op2ndb 4927). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- 2nd = ( x e. _V |-> U. ran { x } )
Theorem	1stvalg 5927	The value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. _V -> ( 1st ` A ) = U. dom { A } )
Theorem	2ndvalg 5928	The value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. _V -> ( 2nd ` A ) = U. ran { A } )
Theorem	1st0 5929	The value of the first-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
|- ( 1st ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	2nd0 5930	The value of the second-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
|- ( 2nd ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	op1st 5931	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( 1st ` <. A , B >. ) = A
Theorem	op2nd 5932	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( 2nd ` <. A , B >. ) = B
Theorem	op1std 5933	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( C = <. A , B >. -> ( 1st ` C ) = A )
Theorem	op2ndd 5934	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( C = <. A , B >. -> ( 2nd ` C ) = B )
Theorem	op1stg 5935	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( 1st ` <. A , B >. ) = A )
Theorem	op2ndg 5936	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( 2nd ` <. A , B >. ) = B )
Theorem	ot1stg 5937	Extract the first member of an ordered triple. (Due to infrequent usage, it isn't worthwhile at this point to define special extractors for triples, so we reuse the ordered pair extractors for ot1stg 5937, ot2ndg 5938, ot3rdgg 5939.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 1st ` ( 1st ` <. A , B , C >. ) ) = A )
Theorem	ot2ndg 5938	Extract the second member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 5937 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 2nd ` ( 1st ` <. A , B , C >. ) ) = B )
Theorem	ot3rdgg 5939	Extract the third member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 5937 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 2nd ` <. A , B , C >. ) = C )
Theorem	1stval2 5940	Alternate value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( 1st ` A ) = |^| |^| A )
Theorem	2ndval2 5941	Alternate value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) = |^| |^| |^| `' { A } )
Theorem	fo1st 5942	The 1st function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- 1st : _V -onto-> _V
Theorem	fo2nd 5943	The 2nd function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- 2nd : _V -onto-> _V
Theorem	f1stres 5944	Mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( 1st |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) --> A
Theorem	f2ndres 5945	Mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( 2nd |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) --> B
Theorem	fo1stresm 5946*	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.)
|- ( E. y y e. B -> ( 1st |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) -onto-> A )
Theorem	fo2ndresm 5947*	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.)
|- ( E. x x e. A -> ( 2nd |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) -onto-> B )
Theorem	1stcof 5948	Composition of the first member function with another function. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2007.)
|- ( F : A --> ( B X. C ) -> ( 1st o. F ) : A --> B )
Theorem	2ndcof 5949	Composition of the second member function with another function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
|- ( F : A --> ( B X. C ) -> ( 2nd o. F ) : A --> C )
Theorem	xp1st 5950	Location of the first element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> ( 1st ` A ) e. B )
Theorem	xp2nd 5951	Location of the second element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. C )
Theorem	1stexg 5952	Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( 1st ` A ) e. _V )
Theorem	2ndexg 5953	Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. _V )
Theorem	elxp6 5954	Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 4931. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )
Theorem	elxp7 5955	Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 4931. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )
Theorem	eqopi 5956	Equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. ( V X. W ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) -> A = <. B , C >. )
Theorem	xp2 5957*	Representation of cross product based on ordered pair component functions. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A X. B ) = { x e. ( _V X. _V ) | ( ( 1st ` x ) e. A /\ ( 2nd ` x ) e. B ) }
Theorem	unielxp 5958	The membership relation for a cross product is inherited by union. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> U. A e. U. ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	1st2nd2 5959	Reconstruction of a member of a cross product in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2013.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. )
Theorem	xpopth 5960	An ordered pair theorem for members of cross products. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. ( C X. D ) /\ B e. ( R X. S ) ) -> ( ( ( 1st ` A ) = ( 1st ` B ) /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = ( 2nd ` B ) ) <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	eqop 5961	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. ( V X. W ) -> ( A = <. B , C >. <-> ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) )
Theorem	eqop2 5962	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( A = <. B , C >. <-> ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) )
Theorem	op1steq 5963*	Two ways of expressing that an element is the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
|- ( A e. ( V X. W ) -> ( ( 1st ` A ) = B <-> E. x A = <. B , x >. ) )
Theorem	2nd1st 5964	Swap the members of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2014.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> U. `' { A } = <. ( 2nd ` A ) , ( 1st ` A ) >. )
Theorem	1st2nd 5965	Reconstruction of a member of a relation in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel B /\ A e. B ) -> A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. )
Theorem	1stdm 5966	The first ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A e. R ) -> ( 1st ` A ) e. dom R )
Theorem	2ndrn 5967	The second ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the range of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A e. R ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. ran R )
Theorem	1st2ndbr 5968	Express an element of a relation as a relationship between first and second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ( Rel B /\ A e. B ) -> ( 1st ` A ) B ( 2nd ` A ) )
Theorem	releldm2 5969*	Two ways of expressing membership in the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
|- ( Rel A -> ( B e. dom A <-> E. x e. A ( 1st ` x ) = B ) )
Theorem	reldm 5970*	An expression for the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
|- ( Rel A -> dom A = ran ( x e. A |-> ( 1st ` x ) ) )
Theorem	sbcopeq1a 5971	Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered pair (analog of sbceq1a 2850 that avoids the existential quantifiers of copsexg 4080). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( A = <. x , y >. -> ( [. ( 1st ` A ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` A ) / y ]. ph <-> ph ) )
Theorem	csbopeq1a 5972	Equality theorem for substitution of a class A for an ordered pair <. x , y >. in B (analog of csbeq1a 2942). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( A = <. x , y >. -> [_ ( 1st ` A ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` A ) / y ]_ B = B )
Theorem	dfopab2 5973*	A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { z e. ( _V X. _V ) | [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph }
Theorem	dfoprab3s 5974*	A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }
Theorem	dfoprab3 5975*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)
|- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps }
Theorem	dfoprab4 5976*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) }
Theorem	dfoprab4f 5977*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) }
Theorem	dfxp3 5978*	Define the cross product of three classes. Compare df-xp 4458. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
|- ( ( A X. B ) X. C ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( x e. A /\ y e. B /\ z e. C ) }
Theorem	elopabi 5979*	A consequence of membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|- ( x = ( 1st ` A ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = ( 2nd ` A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { <. x , y >. | ph } -> ch )
Theorem	eloprabi 5980*	A consequence of membership in an operation class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2006.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
|- ( x = ( 1st ` ( 1st ` A ) ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = ( 2nd ` ( 1st ` A ) ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = ( 2nd ` A ) -> ( ch <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } -> th )
Theorem	mpt2mptsx 5981*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
|- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) = ( z e. U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B ) |-> [_ ( 1st ` z ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]_ C )
Theorem	mpt2mpts 5982*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2015.)
|- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) = ( z e. ( A X. B ) |-> [_ ( 1st ` z ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]_ C )
Theorem	dmmpt2ssx 5983*	The domain of a mapping is a subset of its base class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- dom F C_ U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B )
Theorem	fmpt2x 5984*	Functionality, domain and codomain of a class given by the maps-to notation, where B ( x ) is not constant but depends on x. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. D <-> F : U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B ) --> D )
Theorem	fmpt2 5985*	Functionality, domain and range of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. D <-> F : ( A X. B ) --> D )
Theorem	fnmpt2 5986*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. V -> F Fn ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	mpt2fvex 5987*	Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A. x A. y C e. V /\ R e. W /\ S e. X ) -> ( R F S ) e. _V )
Theorem	fnmpt2i 5988*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- F Fn ( A X. B )
Theorem	dmmpt2 5989*	Domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- dom F = ( A X. B )
Theorem	mpt2fvexi 5990*	Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- R e. _V   &    |- S e. _V   =>    |- ( R F S ) e. _V
Theorem	mpt2exxg 5991*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (version for dependent domains). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2016.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A e. R /\ A. x e. A B e. S ) -> F e. _V )
Theorem	mpt2exg 5992*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S ) -> F e. _V )
Theorem	mpt2exga 5993*	If the domain of a function given by maps-to notation is a set, the function is a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) e. _V )
Theorem	mpt2ex 5994*	If the domain of a function given by maps-to notation is a set, the function is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) e. _V
Theorem	fmpt2co 5995*	Composition of two functions. Variation of fmptco 5478 when the second function has two arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> R e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> R ) )   &    |- ( ph -> G = ( z e. C |-> S ) )   &    |- ( z = R -> S = T )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( G o. F ) = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> T ) )
Theorem	oprabco 5996*	Composition of a function with an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> C e. D )   &    |- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- G = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> ( H ` C ) )   =>    |- ( H Fn D -> G = ( H o. F ) )
Theorem	oprab2co 5997*	Composition of operator abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 23-Apr-2013.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> C e. R )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> D e. S )   &    |- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> <. C , D >. )   &    |- G = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> ( C M D ) )   =>    |- ( M Fn ( R X. S ) -> G = ( M o. F ) )
Theorem	df1st2 5998*	An alternate possible definition of the 1st function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | z = x } = ( 1st |` ( _V X. _V ) )
Theorem	df2nd2 5999*	An alternate possible definition of the 2nd function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | z = y } = ( 2nd |` ( _V X. _V ) )
Theorem	1stconst 6000	The mapping of a restriction of the 1st function to a constant function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( 1st |` ( A X. { B } ) ) : ( A X. { B } ) -1-1-onto-> A )