Theorem rspce 2836

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspc.1	|- F/ x ps
rspc.2	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspce	|- ( ( A e. B /\ ps ) -> E. x e. B ph )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( x)

Proof of Theorem rspce

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcv 2319	. . . 4 |- F/_ x A
2		nfv 1528	. . . . 5 |- F/ x A e. B
3		rspc.1	. . . . 5 |- F/ x ps
4	2, 3	nfan 1565	. . . 4 |- F/ x ( A e. B /\ ps )
5		eleq1 2240	. . . . 5 |- ( x = A -> ( x e. B <-> A e. B ) )
6		rspc.2	. . . . 5 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
7	5, 6	anbi12d 473	. . . 4 |- ( x = A -> ( ( x e. B /\ ph ) <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) ) )
8	1, 4, 7	spcegf 2820	. . 3 |- ( A e. B -> ( ( A e. B /\ ps ) -> E. x ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) )
9	8	anabsi5 579	. 2 |- ( ( A e. B /\ ps ) -> E. x ( x e. B /\ ph ) )
10		df-rex 2461	. 2 |- ( E. x e. B ph <-> E. x ( x e. B /\ ph ) )
11	9, 10	sylibr 134	1 |- ( ( A e. B /\ ps ) -> E. x e. B ph )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1353   F/wnf 1460   E.wex 1492   e. wcel 2148   E.wrex 2456

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-rex 2461  df-v 2739

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcev  2841  bezoutlemmain  11993