Theorem sbciedf 2990

Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbcied.1	|- ( ph -> A e. V )
sbcied.2	|- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
sbciedf.3	|- F/ x ph
sbciedf.4	|- ( ph -> F/ x ch )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbciedf	|- ( ph -> ( [. A / x ]. ps <-> ch ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, A

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( x)   ch( x)   V( x)

Proof of Theorem sbciedf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbcied.1	. 2 |- ( ph -> A e. V )
2		sbciedf.4	. 2 |- ( ph -> F/ x ch )
3		sbciedf.3	. . 3 |- F/ x ph
4		sbcied.2	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
5	4	ex 114	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( x = A -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )
6	3, 5	alrimi 1515	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x ( x = A -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )
7		sbciegft 2985	. 2 |- ( ( A e. V /\ F/ x ch /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) ) -> ( [. A / x ]. ps <-> ch ) )
8	1, 2, 6, 7	syl3anc 1233	1 |- ( ph -> ( [. A / x ]. ps <-> ch ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   <-> wb 104   A.wal 1346   = wceq 1348   F/wnf 1453   e. wcel 2141   [.wsbc 2955

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-ext 2152

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 975  df-tru 1351  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-v 2732  df-sbc 2956

This theorem is referenced by:  sbcied  2991  sbc2iegf  3025  csbiebt  3088  sbcnestgf  3100  ovmpodxf  5978