![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > sbciedf | GIF version |
Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
sbcied.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) |
sbcied.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
sbciedf.3 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 |
sbciedf.4 | ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
sbciedf | ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sbcied.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) | |
2 | sbciedf.4 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) | |
3 | sbciedf.3 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | |
4 | sbcied.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
5 | 4 | ex 115 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
6 | 3, 5 | alrimi 1533 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
7 | sbciegft 3016 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
8 | 1, 2, 6, 7 | syl3anc 1249 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∀wal 1362 = wceq 1364 Ⅎwnf 1471 ∈ wcel 2164 [wsbc 2985 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1458 ax-7 1459 ax-gen 1460 ax-ie1 1504 ax-ie2 1505 ax-8 1515 ax-10 1516 ax-11 1517 ax-i12 1518 ax-bndl 1520 ax-4 1521 ax-17 1537 ax-i9 1541 ax-ial 1545 ax-i5r 1546 ax-ext 2175 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 982 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1472 df-sb 1774 df-clab 2180 df-cleq 2186 df-clel 2189 df-nfc 2325 df-v 2762 df-sbc 2986 |
This theorem is referenced by: sbcied 3022 sbc2iegf 3056 csbiebt 3120 sbcnestgf 3132 ovmpodxf 6044 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |