Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > sbciedf | GIF version |
Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
sbcied.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) |
sbcied.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
sbciedf.3 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 |
sbciedf.4 | ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
sbciedf | ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sbcied.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) | |
2 | sbciedf.4 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) | |
3 | sbciedf.3 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | |
4 | sbcied.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
5 | 4 | ex 114 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
6 | 3, 5 | alrimi 1510 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
7 | sbciegft 2981 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
8 | 1, 2, 6, 7 | syl3anc 1228 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 ∀wal 1341 = wceq 1343 Ⅎwnf 1448 ∈ wcel 2136 [wsbc 2951 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1435 ax-7 1436 ax-gen 1437 ax-ie1 1481 ax-ie2 1482 ax-8 1492 ax-10 1493 ax-11 1494 ax-i12 1495 ax-bndl 1497 ax-4 1498 ax-17 1514 ax-i9 1518 ax-ial 1522 ax-i5r 1523 ax-ext 2147 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 970 df-tru 1346 df-nf 1449 df-sb 1751 df-clab 2152 df-cleq 2158 df-clel 2161 df-nfc 2297 df-v 2728 df-sbc 2952 |
This theorem is referenced by: sbcied 2987 sbc2iegf 3021 csbiebt 3084 sbcnestgf 3096 ovmpodxf 5967 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |