ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  sbciegft Unicode version

Theorem sbciegft 2867
Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, using a bound-variable hypothesis instead of distinct variables. (Closed theorem version of sbciegf 2868.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
sbciegft  |-  ( ( A  e.  V  /\  F/ x ps  /\  A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) ) )  -> 
( [. A  /  x ]. ph  <->  ps ) )
Distinct variable group:    x, A
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x)    ps( x)    V( x)

Proof of Theorem sbciegft
StepHypRef Expression
1 sbc5 2861 . . 3  |-  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  <->  E. x
( x  =  A  /\  ph ) )
2 bi1 116 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( (
ph 
<->  ps )  ->  ( ph  ->  ps ) )
32imim2i 12 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ( x  =  A  -> 
( ph  <->  ps ) )  -> 
( x  =  A  ->  ( ph  ->  ps ) ) )
43impd 251 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( x  =  A  -> 
( ph  <->  ps ) )  -> 
( ( x  =  A  /\  ph )  ->  ps ) )
54alimi 1389 . . . . 5  |-  ( A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) )  ->  A. x
( ( x  =  A  /\  ph )  ->  ps ) )
6 19.23t 1612 . . . . . 6  |-  ( F/ x ps  ->  ( A. x ( ( x  =  A  /\  ph )  ->  ps )  <->  ( E. x ( x  =  A  /\  ph )  ->  ps ) ) )
76biimpa 290 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( F/ x ps  /\  A. x ( ( x  =  A  /\  ph )  ->  ps ) )  ->  ( E. x
( x  =  A  /\  ph )  ->  ps ) )
85, 7sylan2 280 . . . 4  |-  ( ( F/ x ps  /\  A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) ) )  -> 
( E. x ( x  =  A  /\  ph )  ->  ps )
)
983adant1 961 . . 3  |-  ( ( A  e.  V  /\  F/ x ps  /\  A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) ) )  -> 
( E. x ( x  =  A  /\  ph )  ->  ps )
)
101, 9syl5bi 150 . 2  |-  ( ( A  e.  V  /\  F/ x ps  /\  A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) ) )  -> 
( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ps )
)
11 bi2 128 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( (
ph 
<->  ps )  ->  ( ps  ->  ph ) )
1211imim2i 12 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ( x  =  A  -> 
( ph  <->  ps ) )  -> 
( x  =  A  ->  ( ps  ->  ph ) ) )
1312com23 77 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( x  =  A  -> 
( ph  <->  ps ) )  -> 
( ps  ->  (
x  =  A  ->  ph ) ) )
1413alimi 1389 . . . . 5  |-  ( A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) )  ->  A. x
( ps  ->  (
x  =  A  ->  ph ) ) )
15 19.21t 1519 . . . . . 6  |-  ( F/ x ps  ->  ( A. x ( ps  ->  ( x  =  A  ->  ph ) )  <->  ( ps  ->  A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ph )
) ) )
1615biimpa 290 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( F/ x ps  /\  A. x ( ps  ->  ( x  =  A  ->  ph ) ) )  -> 
( ps  ->  A. x
( x  =  A  ->  ph ) ) )
1714, 16sylan2 280 . . . 4  |-  ( ( F/ x ps  /\  A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) ) )  -> 
( ps  ->  A. x
( x  =  A  ->  ph ) ) )
18173adant1 961 . . 3  |-  ( ( A  e.  V  /\  F/ x ps  /\  A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) ) )  -> 
( ps  ->  A. x
( x  =  A  ->  ph ) ) )
19 sbc6g 2862 . . . 4  |-  ( A  e.  V  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  <->  A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ph )
) )
20193ad2ant1 964 . . 3  |-  ( ( A  e.  V  /\  F/ x ps  /\  A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) ) )  -> 
( [. A  /  x ]. ph  <->  A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ph )
) )
2118, 20sylibrd 167 . 2  |-  ( ( A  e.  V  /\  F/ x ps  /\  A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) ) )  -> 
( ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ph )
)
2210, 21impbid 127 1  |-  ( ( A  e.  V  /\  F/ x ps  /\  A. x ( x  =  A  ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) ) )  -> 
( [. A  /  x ]. ph  <->  ps ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 102    <-> wb 103    /\ w3a 924   A.wal 1287    = wceq 1289   F/wnf 1394   E.wex 1426    e. wcel 1438   [.wsbc 2838
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 665  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-10 1441  ax-11 1442  ax-i12 1443  ax-bndl 1444  ax-4 1445  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473  ax-ext 2070
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 926  df-tru 1292  df-nf 1395  df-sb 1693  df-clab 2075  df-cleq 2081  df-clel 2084  df-nfc 2217  df-v 2621  df-sbc 2839
This theorem is referenced by:  sbciegf  2868  sbciedf  2872
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator