| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer | 
      
      
      < Previous  
      Next >
      
       Nearby theorems  | 
  ||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > 2sb5 | GIF version | ||
| Description: Equivalence for double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.) | 
| Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|
| 2sb5 | ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑)) | 
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | sb5 1902 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)) | |
| 2 | 19.42v 1921 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ (𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 3 | anass 401 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ (𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 4 | 3 | exbii 1619 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ (𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑))) | 
| 5 | sb5 1902 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 6 | 5 | anbi2i 457 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑))) | 
| 7 | 2, 4, 6 | 3bitr4ri 213 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑)) | 
| 8 | 7 | exbii 1619 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑)) | 
| 9 | 1, 8 | bitri 184 | 1 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑)) | 
| Colors of variables: wff set class | 
| Syntax hints: ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∃wex 1506 [wsb 1776 | 
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-5 1461 ax-gen 1463 ax-ie1 1507 ax-ie2 1508 ax-8 1518 ax-11 1520 ax-4 1524 ax-17 1540 ax-i9 1544 ax-ial 1548 | 
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-sb 1777 | 
| This theorem is referenced by: opelopabsbALT 4293 | 
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |