| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > 2sb5 | GIF version | ||
| Description: Equivalence for double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 2sb5 | ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | sb5 1936 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)) | |
| 2 | 19.42v 1955 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ (𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 3 | anass 401 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ (𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 4 | 3 | exbii 1653 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ (𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 5 | sb5 1936 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 6 | 5 | anbi2i 457 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 7 | 2, 4, 6 | 3bitr4ri 213 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 8 | 7 | exbii 1653 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 9 | 1, 8 | bitri 184 | 1 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∃wex 1540 [wsb 1810 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-5 1495 ax-gen 1497 ax-ie1 1541 ax-ie2 1542 ax-8 1552 ax-11 1554 ax-4 1558 ax-17 1574 ax-i9 1578 ax-ial 1582 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-sb 1811 |
| This theorem is referenced by: opelopabsbALT 4353 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |