Theorem 2sb6 2000

Description: Equivalence for double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2sb6	⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑦,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem 2sb6

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb6 1898	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑))
2		19.21v 1884	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
3		impexp 263	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
4	3	albii 1481	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
5		sb6 1898	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑))
6	5	imbi2i 226	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 → [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))
7	2, 4, 6	3bitr4ri 213	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 → [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
8	7	albii 1481	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
9	1, 8	bitri 184	1 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1362  [wsb 1773

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1458  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-11 1517  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-sb 1774

This theorem is referenced by: (None)