Theorem axsep2 3987

Description: A less restrictive version of the Separation Scheme ax-sep 3986, where variables 𝑥 and 𝑧 can both appear free in the wff 𝜑, which can therefore be thought of as 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑧). This version was derived from the more restrictive ax-sep 3986 with no additional set theory axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axsep2	⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem axsep2

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq2 2163	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
2	1	anbi1d 456	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))))
3		anabs5 543	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
4	2, 3	syl6bb 195	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))
5	4	bibi2d 231	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))))
6	5	albidv 1763	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))))
7	6	exbidv 1764	. 2 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))))
8		ax-sep 3986	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))
9	7, 8	chvarv 1872	1 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1297  ∃wex 1436

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1391  ax-gen 1393  ax-ie1 1437  ax-ie2 1438  ax-4 1455  ax-17 1474  ax-i9 1478  ax-ial 1482  ax-ext 2082  ax-sep 3986

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1405  df-cleq 2093  df-clel 2096

This theorem is referenced by: (None)