Theorem bj-axemptylem 17084

Description: Lemma for bj-axempty 17085 and bj-axempty2 17086. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use ax-nul 4259 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-axemptylem	⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ⊥)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem bj-axemptylem

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdfal 17025	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED ⊥
2	1	bdsep1 17077	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ⊥))
3		biimp 118	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ⊥)) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ⊥)))
4		falimd 1417	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ⊥) → ⊥)
5	3, 4	syl6 33	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ⊥)) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ⊥))
6	5	alimi 1508	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ⊥)) → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ⊥))
7	2, 6	eximii 1655	1 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ⊥)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1400  ⊥wfal 1407  ∃wex 1545

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-5 1500  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-4 1563  ax-ial 1587  ax-bd0 17005  ax-bdim 17006  ax-bdn 17009  ax-bdeq 17012  ax-bdsep 17076

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408

This theorem is used by:  bj-axempty  17085  bj-axempty2  17086