Theorem bj-axemptylem 13413

Description: Lemma for bj-axempty 13414 and bj-axempty2 13415. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use ax-nul 4086 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-axemptylem	⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ⊥)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem bj-axemptylem

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdfal 13354	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED ⊥
2	1	bdsep1 13406	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ⊥))
3		biimp 117	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ⊥)) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ⊥)))
4		falimd 1347	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ⊥) → ⊥)
5	3, 4	syl6 33	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ⊥)) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ⊥))
6	5	alimi 1432	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ⊥)) → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ⊥))
7	2, 6	eximii 1579	1 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ⊥)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1330  ⊥wfal 1337  ∃wex 1469

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-5 1424  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-4 1487  ax-ial 1511  ax-bd0 13334  ax-bdim 13335  ax-bdn 13338  ax-bdeq 13341  ax-bdsep 13405

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1335  df-fal 1338

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-axempty  13414  bj-axempty2  13415