Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > dfrex2dc | GIF version |
Description: Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jun-2022.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dfrex2dc | ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rex 2454 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
2 | 1 | dcbii 835 | . . 3 ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ DECID ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
3 | dfexdc 1494 | . . 3 ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
4 | 2, 3 | sylbi 120 | . 2 ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
5 | df-ral 2453 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜑)) | |
6 | imnan 685 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
7 | 6 | albii 1463 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
8 | 5, 7 | bitri 183 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
9 | 8 | notbii 663 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
10 | 4, 1, 9 | 3bitr4g 222 | 1 ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 DECID wdc 829 ∀wal 1346 ∃wex 1485 ∈ wcel 2141 ∀wral 2448 ∃wrex 2449 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-in1 609 ax-in2 610 ax-io 704 ax-5 1440 ax-gen 1442 ax-ie2 1487 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-dc 830 df-tru 1351 df-fal 1354 df-ral 2453 df-rex 2454 |
This theorem is referenced by: dfrex2fin 6877 exmidomniim 7113 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |