Theorem dfrex2dc 2365

Description: Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jun-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfrex2dc	⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑))

Proof of Theorem dfrex2dc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rex 2359	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
2	1	dcbii 781	. . 3 ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ DECID ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
3		dfexdc 1431	. . 3 ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
4	2, 3	sylbi 119	. 2 ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
5		df-ral 2358	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜑))
6		imnan 657	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
7	6	albii 1400	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
8	5, 7	bitri 182	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
9	8	notbii 627	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
10	4, 1, 9	3bitr4g 221	1 ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   ↔ wb 103  DECID wdc 776  ∀wal 1283  ∃wex 1422   ∈ wcel 1434  ∀wral 2353  ∃wrex 2354

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 577  ax-in2 578  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie2 1424

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-dc 777  df-tru 1288  df-fal 1291  df-ral 2358  df-rex 2359

This theorem is referenced by:  dfrex2fin  6544  exmidomniim  6700