Theorem nelss 3244

Description: Demonstrate by witnesses that two classes lack a subclass relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Feb-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nelss	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem nelss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssel 3177	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
2	1	com12 30	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
3	2	con3dimp 636	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∈ wcel 2167   ⊆ wss 3157

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-11 1520  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170

This theorem is referenced by: (None)