Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ssrexf | GIF version |
Description: Restricted existential quantification follows from a subclass relationship. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssrexf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
ssrexf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssrexf | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ssrexf.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | ssrexf.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
3 | 1, 2 | nfss 3135 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 |
4 | ssel 3136 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
5 | 4 | anim1d 334 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
6 | 3, 5 | eximd 1600 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
7 | df-rex 2450 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
8 | df-rex 2450 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
9 | 6, 7, 8 | 3imtr4g 204 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ∃wex 1480 ∈ wcel 2136 Ⅎwnfc 2295 ∃wrex 2445 ⊆ wss 3116 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1435 ax-7 1436 ax-gen 1437 ax-ie1 1481 ax-ie2 1482 ax-8 1492 ax-10 1493 ax-11 1494 ax-i12 1495 ax-bndl 1497 ax-4 1498 ax-17 1514 ax-i9 1518 ax-ial 1522 ax-i5r 1523 ax-ext 2147 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-nf 1449 df-sb 1751 df-clab 2152 df-cleq 2158 df-clel 2161 df-nfc 2297 df-ral 2449 df-rex 2450 df-in 3122 df-ss 3129 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |