![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ssrexf | GIF version |
Description: Restricted existential quantification follows from a subclass relationship. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssrexf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
ssrexf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssrexf | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ssrexf.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | ssrexf.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
3 | 1, 2 | nfss 3095 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 |
4 | ssel 3096 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
5 | 4 | anim1d 334 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
6 | 3, 5 | eximd 1592 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
7 | df-rex 2423 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
8 | df-rex 2423 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
9 | 6, 7, 8 | 3imtr4g 204 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ∃wex 1469 ∈ wcel 1481 Ⅎwnfc 2269 ∃wrex 2418 ⊆ wss 3076 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1424 ax-7 1425 ax-gen 1426 ax-ie1 1470 ax-ie2 1471 ax-8 1483 ax-10 1484 ax-11 1485 ax-i12 1486 ax-bndl 1487 ax-4 1488 ax-17 1507 ax-i9 1511 ax-ial 1515 ax-i5r 1516 ax-ext 2122 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-nf 1438 df-sb 1737 df-clab 2127 df-cleq 2133 df-clel 2136 df-nfc 2271 df-ral 2422 df-rex 2423 df-in 3082 df-ss 3089 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |