![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ssrexf | GIF version |
Description: Restricted existential quantification follows from a subclass relationship. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssrexf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
ssrexf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssrexf | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ssrexf.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | ssrexf.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
3 | 1, 2 | nfss 3148 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 |
4 | ssel 3149 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
5 | 4 | anim1d 336 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
6 | 3, 5 | eximd 1612 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
7 | df-rex 2461 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
8 | df-rex 2461 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
9 | 6, 7, 8 | 3imtr4g 205 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ∃wex 1492 ∈ wcel 2148 Ⅎwnfc 2306 ∃wrex 2456 ⊆ wss 3129 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 709 ax-5 1447 ax-7 1448 ax-gen 1449 ax-ie1 1493 ax-ie2 1494 ax-8 1504 ax-10 1505 ax-11 1506 ax-i12 1507 ax-bndl 1509 ax-4 1510 ax-17 1526 ax-i9 1530 ax-ial 1534 ax-i5r 1535 ax-ext 2159 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1461 df-sb 1763 df-clab 2164 df-cleq 2170 df-clel 2173 df-nfc 2308 df-ral 2460 df-rex 2461 df-in 3135 df-ss 3142 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |