Theorem nrexdv 2559

Description: Deduction adding restricted existential quantifier to negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nrexdv.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nrexdv	⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem nrexdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nrexdv.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝜓)
2	1	ralrimiva 2539	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜓)
3		ralnex 2454	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
4	2, 3	sylib 121	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ∈ wcel 2136  ∀wral 2444  ∃wrex 2445

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-5 1435  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie2 1482  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1346  df-fal 1349  df-nf 1449  df-ral 2449  df-rex 2450

This theorem is referenced by:  ltpopr  7536  cauappcvgprlemladdru  7597  cauappcvgprlemladdrl  7598  caucvgprlemladdrl  7619  caucvgprprlemaddq  7649  dvdsle  11782