Theorem nrexdv 2600

Description: Deduction adding restricted existential quantifier to negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nrexdv.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nrexdv	⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem nrexdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nrexdv.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝜓)
2	1	ralrimiva 2580	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜓)
3		ralnex 2495	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
4	2, 3	sylib 122	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∈ wcel 2177  ∀wral 2485  ∃wrex 2486

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-5 1471  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie2 1518  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1376  df-fal 1379  df-nf 1485  df-ral 2490  df-rex 2491

This theorem is referenced by:  ltpopr  7723  cauappcvgprlemladdru  7784  cauappcvgprlemladdrl  7785  caucvgprlemladdrl  7806  caucvgprprlemaddq  7836  dvdsle  12225