Theorem unjust 3156

Description: Soundness justification theorem for df-un 3157. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unjust	⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵

Proof of Theorem unjust

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2256	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
2		eleq1 2256	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	orbi12d 794	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
4	3	cbvabv 2318	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)}
5		eleq1 2256	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
6		eleq1 2256	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
7	5, 6	orbi12d 794	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
8	7	cbvabv 2318	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
9	4, 8	eqtri 2214	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}

Syntax hints:   ∨ wo 709   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2164  {cab 2179

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2175

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189

This theorem is referenced by: (None)