Theorem unjust 3132

Description: Soundness justification theorem for df-un 3133. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unjust	⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵

Proof of Theorem unjust

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2240	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
2		eleq1 2240	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	orbi12d 793	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
4	3	cbvabv 2302	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)}
5		eleq1 2240	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
6		eleq1 2240	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
7	5, 6	orbi12d 793	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
8	7	cbvabv 2302	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
9	4, 8	eqtri 2198	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}

Syntax hints:   ∨ wo 708   = wceq 1353   ∈ wcel 2148  {cab 2163

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173

This theorem is referenced by: (None)