Theorem abeqinbi 35989

Description: Intersection with class abstraction and equivalent wff's. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
abeqinbi.1	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)
abeqinbi.2	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
abeqinbi.3	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abeqinbi	⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ 𝜓}

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐶

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem abeqinbi

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		abeqinbi.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)
2		abeqinbi.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
3	1, 2	abeqin 35988	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ 𝜑}
4		abeqinbi.3	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
5	3, 4	rabimbieq 35987	1 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ 𝜓}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111  {cab 2735  {crab 3074   ∩ cin 3859

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2729

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2736  df-cleq 2750  df-clel 2830  df-rab 3079  df-v 3411  df-in 3867

This theorem is referenced by:  dfrefrels2  36227  dfcnvrefrels2  36240  dfsymrels2  36255  dftrrels2  36285