![]() |
Mathbox for Peter Mazsa |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > dftrrels2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Alternate definition of
the class of transitive relations.
I'd prefer to define the class of transitive relations by using the definition of composition by [Suppes] p. 63. df-coSUP (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥𝐴𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝐵𝑦)} as opposed to the present definition of composition df-co 5697 (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥𝐵𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝐴𝑦)} because the Suppes definition keeps the order of 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝑅, 𝑆, 𝑇 by default in trsinxpSUP (((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∘ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐶))) ⊆ (𝑇 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐶)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑆𝑧) → 𝑥𝑇𝑧)) while the present definition of composition disarranges them: trsinxp (((𝑆 ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))) ⊆ (𝑇 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐶 )) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑆𝑧) → 𝑥𝑇𝑧) ). This is not mission critical to me, the implication of the Suppes definition is just more aesthetic, at least in the above case. If we swap to the Suppes definition of class composition, I would define the present class of all transitive sets as df-trsSUP and I would consider to switch the definition of the class of cosets by 𝑅 from the present df-coss 38392 to a df-cossSUP. But perhaps there is a mathematical reason to keep the present definition of composition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dftrrels2 | ⊢ TrRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-trrels 38554 | . 2 ⊢ TrRels = ( Trs ∩ Rels ) | |
2 | df-trs 38553 | . 2 ⊢ Trs = {𝑟 ∣ ((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))} | |
3 | inex1g 5324 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ V → (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V) | |
4 | 3 | elv 3482 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V |
5 | brssr 38482 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V → (((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)))) | |
6 | 4, 5 | ax-mp 5 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) |
7 | elrels6 38471 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ V → (𝑟 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟)) | |
8 | 7 | elv 3482 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟) |
9 | 8 | biimpi 216 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟) |
10 | 9, 9 | coeq12d 5877 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → ((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) = (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟)) |
11 | 10, 9 | sseq12d 4028 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟)) |
12 | 6, 11 | bitrid 283 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟)) |
13 | 1, 2, 12 | abeqinbi 38234 | 1 ⊢ TrRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ↔ wb 206 = wceq 1536 ∈ wcel 2105 {crab 3432 Vcvv 3477 ∩ cin 3961 ⊆ wss 3962 class class class wbr 5147 × cxp 5686 dom cdm 5688 ran crn 5689 ∘ ccom 5692 Rels crels 38163 S cssr 38164 Trs ctrs 38174 TrRels ctrrels 38175 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1791 ax-4 1805 ax-5 1907 ax-6 1964 ax-7 2004 ax-8 2107 ax-9 2115 ax-ext 2705 ax-sep 5301 ax-nul 5311 ax-pr 5437 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1539 df-fal 1549 df-ex 1776 df-sb 2062 df-clab 2712 df-cleq 2726 df-clel 2813 df-ral 3059 df-rex 3068 df-rab 3433 df-v 3479 df-dif 3965 df-un 3967 df-in 3969 df-ss 3979 df-nul 4339 df-if 4531 df-pw 4606 df-sn 4631 df-pr 4633 df-op 4637 df-br 5148 df-opab 5210 df-xp 5694 df-rel 5695 df-cnv 5696 df-co 5697 df-dm 5698 df-rn 5699 df-res 5700 df-rels 38466 df-ssr 38479 df-trs 38553 df-trrels 38554 |
This theorem is referenced by: dftrrels3 38557 eltrrels2 38560 dfeqvrels2 38569 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |