![]() |
Mathbox for Peter Mazsa |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > dftrrels2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Alternate definition of
the class of transitive relations.
I'd prefer to define the class of transitive relations by using the definition of composition by [Suppes] p. 63. df-coSUP (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥𝐴𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝐵𝑦)} as opposed to the present definition of composition df-co 5683 (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥𝐵𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝐴𝑦)} because the Suppes definition keeps the order of 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝑅, 𝑆, 𝑇 by default in trsinxpSUP (((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∘ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐶))) ⊆ (𝑇 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐶)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑆𝑧) → 𝑥𝑇𝑧)) while the present definition of composition disarranges them: trsinxp (((𝑆 ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))) ⊆ (𝑇 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐶 )) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑆𝑧) → 𝑥𝑇𝑧) ). This is not mission critical to me, the implication of the Suppes definition is just more aesthetic, at least in the above case. If we swap to the Suppes definition of class composition, I would define the present class of all transitive sets as df-trsSUP and I would consider to switch the definition of the class of cosets by 𝑅 from the present df-coss 37218 to a df-cossSUP. But perhaps there is a mathematical reason to keep the present definition of composition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dftrrels2 | ⊢ TrRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-trrels 37380 | . 2 ⊢ TrRels = ( Trs ∩ Rels ) | |
2 | df-trs 37379 | . 2 ⊢ Trs = {𝑟 ∣ ((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))} | |
3 | inex1g 5317 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ V → (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V) | |
4 | 3 | elv 3481 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V |
5 | brssr 37308 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V → (((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)))) | |
6 | 4, 5 | ax-mp 5 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) |
7 | elrels6 37297 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ V → (𝑟 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟)) | |
8 | 7 | elv 3481 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟) |
9 | 8 | biimpi 215 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟) |
10 | 9, 9 | coeq12d 5861 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → ((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) = (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟)) |
11 | 10, 9 | sseq12d 4013 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟)) |
12 | 6, 11 | bitrid 283 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∘ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟)) |
13 | 1, 2, 12 | abeqinbi 37058 | 1 ⊢ TrRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ↔ wb 205 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2107 {crab 3433 Vcvv 3475 ∩ cin 3945 ⊆ wss 3946 class class class wbr 5146 × cxp 5672 dom cdm 5674 ran crn 5675 ∘ ccom 5678 Rels crels 36982 S cssr 36983 Trs ctrs 36993 TrRels ctrrels 36994 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2109 ax-9 2117 ax-10 2138 ax-12 2172 ax-ext 2704 ax-sep 5297 ax-nul 5304 ax-pr 5425 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-or 847 df-3an 1090 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2711 df-cleq 2725 df-clel 2811 df-ral 3063 df-rex 3072 df-rab 3434 df-v 3477 df-dif 3949 df-un 3951 df-in 3953 df-ss 3963 df-nul 4321 df-if 4527 df-pw 4602 df-sn 4627 df-pr 4629 df-op 4633 df-br 5147 df-opab 5209 df-xp 5680 df-rel 5681 df-cnv 5682 df-co 5683 df-dm 5684 df-rn 5685 df-res 5686 df-rels 37292 df-ssr 37305 df-trs 37379 df-trrels 37380 |
This theorem is referenced by: dftrrels3 37383 eltrrels2 37386 dfeqvrels2 37395 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |