Theorem rabimbieq 38629

Description: Restricted equivalent wff's correspond to restricted class abstractions which are equal with the same class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabimbieq.1	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
rabimbieq.2	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabimbieq	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}

Proof of Theorem rabimbieq

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabimbieq.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
2		rabimbieq.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	rabbiia 3395	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
4	1, 3	eqtri 2762	1 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 207   = wceq 1547   ∈ wcel 2119  {crab 3391

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-9 2129  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-tru 1550  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-rab 3392

This theorem is referenced by:  abeqinbi  38631  dfsymrels4  39007  dfsymrels5  39008  dffunsALTV2  39145  dffunsALTV3  39146  dffunsALTV4  39147  dfdisjs2  39170  dfdisjs5  39173