Theorem rabimbieq 38964

Description: Restricted equivalent wff's correspond to restricted class abstractions which are equal with the same class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabimbieq.1	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
rabimbieq.2	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabimbieq	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}

Proof of Theorem rabimbieq

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabimbieq.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
2		rabimbieq.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	rabbiia 3422	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
4	1, 3	eqtri 2788	1 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  {crab 3418

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2737

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-rab 3419

This theorem is used by:  abeqinbi  38966  dfsymrels4  39342  dfsymrels5  39343  dffunsALTV2  39480  dffunsALTV3  39481  dffunsALTV4  39482  dfdisjs2  39505  dfdisjs5  39508