Theorem dfrefrels2 38967

Description: Alternate definition of the class of reflexive relations. This is a 0-ary class constant, which is recommended for definitions (see the 1. Guideline at https://us.metamath.org/ileuni/mathbox.html). Proper classes (like I, see iprc 7858) are not elements of this (or any) class: if a class is an element of another class, it is not a proper class but a set, see elex 3453. So if we use 0-ary constant classes as our main definitions, they are valid only for sets, not for proper classes. For proper classes we use predicate-type definitions like df-refrel 38966. See also the comment of df-rels 38814.

Note that while elementhood in the class of relations cancels restriction of 𝑟 in dfrefrels2 38967, it keeps restriction of I: this is why the very similar definitions df-refs 38964, df-syms 38996 and df-trs 39030 diverge when we switch from (general) sets to relations in dfrefrels2 38967, dfsymrels2 38999 and dftrrels2 39033. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfrefrels2	⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟}

Proof of Theorem dfrefrels2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-refrels 38965	. 2 ⊢ RefRels = ( Refs ∩ Rels )
2		df-refs 38964	. 2 ⊢ Refs = {𝑟 ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))}
3		inex1g 5254	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ V → (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V)
4	3	elv 3437	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V
5		brssr 38955	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V → (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))))
6	4, 5	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)))
7		elrels6 38819	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ V → (𝑟 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟))
8	7	elv 3437	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟)
9	8	biimpi 217	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟)
10	9	sseq2d 3954	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟))
11	6, 10	bitrid 284	. 2 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟))
12	1, 2, 11	abeqinbi 38629	1 ⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟}

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 207   = wceq 1547   ∈ wcel 2119  {crab 3392  Vcvv 3432   ∩ cin 3889   ⊆ wss 3890   class class class wbr 5079   I cid 5519   × cxp 5623  dom cdm 5625  ran crn 5626   Rels crels 38559   S cssr 38560   Refs crefs 38561   RefRels crefrels 38562

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-ext 2712  ax-sep 5225  ax-pr 5369

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2719  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2815  df-ral 3055  df-rex 3065  df-rab 3393  df-v 3434  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-nul 4269  df-if 4462  df-pw 4538  df-sn 4563  df-pr 4565  df-op 4569  df-br 5080  df-opab 5142  df-xp 5631  df-rel 5632  df-cnv 5633  df-dm 5635  df-rn 5636  df-res 5637  df-rels 38814  df-ssr 38952  df-refs 38964  df-refrels 38965

This theorem is referenced by:  dfrefrels3  38968  elrefrels2  38972  refsymrels2  39023  refrelsredund4  39090