Theorem dfrefrels2 36325

Description: Alternate definition of the class of reflexive relations. This is a 0-ary class constant, which is recommended for definitions (see the 1. Guideline at https://us.metamath.org/ileuni/mathbox.html). Proper classes (like I, see iprc 7680) are not elements of this (or any) class: if a class is an element of another class, it is not a proper class but a set, see elex 3419. So if we use 0-ary constant classes as our main definitions, they are valid only for sets, not for proper classes. For proper classes we use predicate-type definitions like df-refrel 36324. See also the comment of df-rels 36297.

Note that while elementhood in the class of relations cancels restriction of 𝑟 in dfrefrels2 36325, it keeps restriction of I: this is why the very similar definitions df-refs 36322, df-syms 36350 and df-trs 36380 diverge when we switch from (general) sets to relations in dfrefrels2 36325, dfsymrels2 36353 and dftrrels2 36383. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfrefrels2	⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟}

Proof of Theorem dfrefrels2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-refrels 36323	. 2 ⊢ RefRels = ( Refs ∩ Rels )
2		df-refs 36322	. 2 ⊢ Refs = {𝑟 ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))}
3		inex1g 5201	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ V → (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V)
4	3	elv 3407	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V
5		brssr 36313	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V → (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))))
6	4, 5	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)))
7		elrels6 36302	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ V → (𝑟 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟))
8	7	elv 3407	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟)
9	8	biimpi 219	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟)
10	9	sseq2d 3923	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟))
11	6, 10	syl5bb 286	. 2 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟))
12	1, 2, 11	abeqinbi 36087	1 ⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟}

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1543   ∈ wcel 2110  {crab 3058  Vcvv 3401   ∩ cin 3856   ⊆ wss 3857   class class class wbr 5043   I cid 5443   × cxp 5538  dom cdm 5540  ran crn 5541   Rels crels 36029   S cssr 36030   Refs crefs 36031   RefRels crefrels 36032

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1976  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5181  ax-nul 5188  ax-pr 5311

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 848  df-3an 1091  df-tru 1546  df-fal 1556  df-ex 1788  df-nf 1792  df-sb 2071  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2812  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3060  df-rab 3063  df-v 3403  df-dif 3860  df-un 3862  df-in 3864  df-ss 3874  df-nul 4228  df-if 4430  df-pw 4505  df-sn 4532  df-pr 4534  df-op 4538  df-br 5044  df-opab 5106  df-xp 5546  df-rel 5547  df-cnv 5548  df-dm 5550  df-rn 5551  df-res 5552  df-rels 36297  df-ssr 36310  df-refs 36322  df-refrels 36323

This theorem is referenced by:  dfrefrels3  36326  elrefrels2  36329  refsymrels2  36373  refrelsredund4  36439