Theorem dfrefrels2 36752

Description: Alternate definition of the class of reflexive relations. This is a 0-ary class constant, which is recommended for definitions (see the 1. Guideline at https://us.metamath.org/ileuni/mathbox.html). Proper classes (like I, see iprc 7806) are not elements of this (or any) class: if a class is an element of another class, it is not a proper class but a set, see elex 3458. So if we use 0-ary constant classes as our main definitions, they are valid only for sets, not for proper classes. For proper classes we use predicate-type definitions like df-refrel 36751. See also the comment of df-rels 36724.

Note that while elementhood in the class of relations cancels restriction of 𝑟 in dfrefrels2 36752, it keeps restriction of I: this is why the very similar definitions df-refs 36749, df-syms 36781 and df-trs 36811 diverge when we switch from (general) sets to relations in dfrefrels2 36752, dfsymrels2 36784 and dftrrels2 36814. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfrefrels2	⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟}

Proof of Theorem dfrefrels2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-refrels 36750	. 2 ⊢ RefRels = ( Refs ∩ Rels )
2		df-refs 36749	. 2 ⊢ Refs = {𝑟 ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))}
3		inex1g 5257	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ V → (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V)
4	3	elv 3446	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V
5		brssr 36740	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ∈ V → (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))))
6	4, 5	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)))
7		elrels6 36729	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ V → (𝑟 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟))
8	7	elv 3446	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟)
9	8	biimpi 215	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) = 𝑟)
10	9	sseq2d 3962	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟))
11	6, 10	bitrid 282	. 2 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ Rels → (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) S (𝑟 ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ↔ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟))
12	1, 2, 11	abeqinbi 36490	1 ⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟}

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2105  {crab 3403  Vcvv 3440   ∩ cin 3895   ⊆ wss 3896   class class class wbr 5086   I cid 5505   × cxp 5605  dom cdm 5607  ran crn 5608   Rels crels 36412   S cssr 36413   Refs crefs 36414   RefRels crefrels 36415

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5237  ax-nul 5244  ax-pr 5366

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3404  df-v 3442  df-dif 3899  df-un 3901  df-in 3903  df-ss 3913  df-nul 4267  df-if 4471  df-pw 4546  df-sn 4571  df-pr 4573  df-op 4577  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-xp 5613  df-rel 5614  df-cnv 5615  df-dm 5617  df-rn 5618  df-res 5619  df-rels 36724  df-ssr 36737  df-refs 36749  df-refrels 36750

This theorem is referenced by:  dfrefrels3  36753  elrefrels2  36757  refsymrels2  36804  refrelsredund4  36871