Theorem alexeqg 3639

Description: Two ways to express substitution of 𝐴 for 𝑥 in 𝜑. This is the analogue for classes of sbalex 2230. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) (Revised by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
alexeqg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem alexeqg

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq2 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
2	1	anbi1d 629	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	exbidv 1916	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
4	1	imbi1d 340	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
5	4	albidv 1915	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
6		sbalex 2230	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
7	3, 5, 6	vtoclbg 3544	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
8	7	bicomd 222	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 394  ∀wal 1531   = wceq 1533  ∃wex 1773   ∈ wcel 2098

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-12 2166  ax-ext 2699

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqex  3640  sbc6gOLD  3809