Theorem eqvincf 3639

Description: A variable introduction law for class equality, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eqvincf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
eqvincf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
eqvincf.3	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqvincf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem eqvincf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqvincf.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2	1	eqvinc 3638	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))
3		eqvincf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	3	nfeq2 2921	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴
5		eqvincf.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
6	5	nfeq2 2921	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐵
7	4, 6	nfan 1903	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)
8		nfv 1918	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵)
9		eqeq1 2737	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
10		eqeq1 2737	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵))
11	9, 10	anbi12d 632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵)))
12	7, 8, 11	cbvexv1 2339	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵))
13	2, 12	bitri 275	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1542  ∃wex 1782   ∈ wcel 2107  Ⅎwnfc 2884  Vcvv 3475

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886

This theorem is referenced by: (None)