Theorem eqvincf 3643

Description: A variable introduction law for class equality, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eqvincf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
eqvincf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
eqvincf.3	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqvincf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem eqvincf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqvincf.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2	1	eqvinc 3642	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))
3		eqvincf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	3	nfeq2 2995	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴
5		eqvincf.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
6	5	nfeq2 2995	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐵
7	4, 6	nfan 1896	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)
8		nfv 1911	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵)
9		eqeq1 2825	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
10		eqeq1 2825	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵))
11	9, 10	anbi12d 632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵)))
12	7, 8, 11	cbvexv1 2358	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵))
13	2, 12	bitri 277	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1533  ∃wex 1776   ∈ wcel 2110  Ⅎwnfc 2961  Vcvv 3495

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2793

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963

This theorem is referenced by: (None)