Theorem bj-df-sb 37305

Description: Proposed definition to replace df-sb 2100 and df-sbc 3747. Proof is therefore unimportant. Contrary to df-sb 2100, this definition makes a substituted formula false when one substitutes a non-existent object for a variable: this is better suited to the "Levy-style" treatment of classes as virtual objects adopted by set.mm. That difference is unimportant since as soon as ax6ev 2002 is posited, all variables "exist". (Contributed by BJ, 19-Feb-2026.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-df-sb	⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝐴   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem bj-df-sb

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbc7 3778	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
2		sbsbc 3750	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
3		sb6 2122	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
4	2, 3	bitr3i 280	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
5	4	anbi2i 635	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))
6	5	exbii 1881	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))
7	1, 6	bitri 278	1 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812  [wsb 2099  [wsbc 3746

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747

This theorem is used by:  bj-sbcex  37306  bj-dfsbc  37307