Theorem sb6 2089

Description: Alternate definition of substitution when variables are disjoint. Compare Theorem 6.2 of [Quine] p. 40. Also proved as Lemmas 16 and 17 of [Tarski] p. 70. The implication "to the left" also holds without a disjoint variable condition (sb2 2480). Theorem sb6f 2501 replaces the disjoint variable condition with a nonfreeness hypothesis. Theorem sb4b 2475 replaces it with a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Sep-2018.) Revise df-sb 2069. (Revised by BJ, 22-Dec-2020.) Remove use of ax-11 2156. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jul-2023.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Jul-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb6	⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑡 → 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑡

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑡)

Proof of Theorem sb6

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-sb 2069	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))
2		equequ2 2030	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑡 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑡))
3	2	imbi1d 341	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑡 → ((𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → 𝜑)))
4	3	albidv 1924	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑡 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑡 → 𝜑)))
5	4	equsalvw 2008	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑡 → 𝜑))
6	1, 5	bitri 274	1 ⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑡 → 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wal 1537  [wsb 2068

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-ex 1784  df-sb 2069

This theorem is referenced by:  2sb6  2090  sb1v  2091  sbrimvlem  2095  sbievw  2097  sbcom3vv  2100  nfs1v  2155  sb4av  2239  sb6a  2253  sb5  2271  sb56OLD  2273  sbiev  2312  2eu6  2658  nfabdw  2929  nfabdwOLD  2930  elab6g  3593  ab0OLD  4306  disj  4378  iota4  6399  bj-ax12ssb  34766  bj-sbievwd  34891  bj-hbs1  34921  bj-hbsb2av  34923  bj-sbievw1  34956  bj-sbievw2  34957  bj-sbievw  34958  wl-lem-moexsb  35650  absnsb  44408  ichnfimlem  44803