| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 369 of 512) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31526) |
(31527-33049) |
(33050-51159) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | funpartss 36801 | The functional part of 𝐹 is a subset of 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ Funpart𝐹 ⊆ 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | funpartfv 36802 | The function value of the functional part is identical to the original functional value. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (Funpart𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | fullfunfnv 36803 | The full functional part of 𝐹 is a function over V. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ FullFun𝐹 Fn V | ||
| Theorem | fullfunfv 36804 | The function value of the full function of 𝐹 agrees with 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (FullFun𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | brfullfun 36805 | A binary relation form condition for the full function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴FullFun𝐹𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | brrestrict 36806 | Binary relation form of the Restrict function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Restrict𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dfrecs2 36807 | A quantifier-free definition of recs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ recs(𝐹) = ∪ (( Funs ∩ (◡Domain “ On)) ∖ dom ((◡ E ∘ Domain) ∖ Fix (◡Apply ∘ (FullFun𝐹 ∘ Restrict)))) | ||
| Theorem | dfrdg4 36808 | A quantifier-free definition of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ rec(𝐹, 𝐴) = ∪ (( Funs ∩ (◡Domain “ On)) ∖ dom ((◡ E ∘ Domain) ∖ Fix (◡Apply ∘ (((V × {∅}) × {∪ {𝐴}}) ∪ ((( Bigcup ∘ Img) ↾ (V × Limits )) ∪ ((FullFun𝐹 ∘ (Apply ∘ pprod( I , Bigcup ))) ↾ (V × ran Succ))))))) | ||
| Theorem | dfint3 36809 | Quantifier-free definition of class intersection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ ∩ 𝐴 = (V ∖ (◡(V ∖ E ) “ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | imagesset 36810 | The Image functor applied to the converse of the subset relationship yields a subset of the subset relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Image◡ SSet ⊆ SSet | ||
| Theorem | brub 36811* | Binary relation form of the upper bound functor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆UB𝑅𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥𝑅𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | brlb 36812* | Binary relation form of the lower bound functor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆LB𝑅𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝐴𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | dffr7 36813 | Alternate quantifier-free definition of a well-founded relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ (𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ⊆ Fix ( E ∘ (V ∖ (𝑅 ∘ ◡ E )))) | ||
| Syntax | caltop 36814 | Declare the syntax for an alternate ordered pair. |
| class ⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ | ||
| Syntax | caltxp 36815 | Declare the syntax for an alternate Cartesian product. |
| class (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) | ||
| Definition | df-altop 36816 | An alternative definition of ordered pairs. This definition removes a hypothesis from its defining theorem (see altopth 36827), making it more convenient in some circumstances. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, {𝐵}}} | ||
| Definition | df-altxp 36817* | Define Cartesian products of alternative ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = ⟪𝑥, 𝑦⟫} | ||
| Theorem | altopex 36818 | Alternative ordered pairs always exist. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | altopthsn 36819 | Two alternate ordered pairs are equal iff the singletons of their respective elements are equal. Note that this holds regardless of sethood of any of the elements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ ({𝐴} = {𝐶} ∧ {𝐵} = {𝐷})) | ||
| Theorem | altopeq12 36820 | Equality for alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ⟪𝐴, 𝐶⟫ = ⟪𝐵, 𝐷⟫) | ||
| Theorem | altopeq1 36821 | Equality for alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟪𝐴, 𝐶⟫ = ⟪𝐵, 𝐶⟫) | ||
| Theorem | altopeq2 36822 | Equality for alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟪𝐶, 𝐴⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐵⟫) | ||
| Theorem | altopth1 36823 | Equality of the first members of equal alternate ordered pairs, which holds regardless of the second members' sethood. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ → 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | altopth2 36824 | Equality of the second members of equal alternate ordered pairs, which holds regardless of the first members' sethood. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ → 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altopthg 36825 | Alternate ordered pair theorem. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | altopthbg 36826 | Alternate ordered pair theorem. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | altopth 36827 | The alternate ordered pair theorem. If two alternate ordered pairs are equal, their first elements are equal and their second elements are equal. Note that 𝐶 and 𝐷 are not required to be a set due to a peculiarity of our specific ordered pair definition, as opposed to the regular ordered pairs used here, which (as in opth 5444), requires 𝐷 to be a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altopthb 36828 | Alternate ordered pair theorem with different sethood requirements. See altopth 36827 for more comments. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altopthc 36829 | Alternate ordered pair theorem with different sethood requirements. See altopth 36827 for more comments. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altopthd 36830 | Alternate ordered pair theorem with different sethood requirements. See altopth 36827 for more comments. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altxpeq1 36831 | Equality for alternate Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ×× 𝐶) = (𝐵 ×× 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | altxpeq2 36832 | Equality for alternate Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ×× 𝐴) = (𝐶 ×× 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elaltxp 36833* | Membership in alternate Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑋 = ⟪𝑥, 𝑦⟫) | ||
| Theorem | altopelaltxp 36834 | Alternate ordered pair membership in a Cartesian product. Note that, unlike opelxp 5686, there is no sethood requirement here. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (⟪𝑋, 𝑌⟫ ∈ (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | altxpsspw 36835 | An inclusion rule for alternate Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) ⊆ 𝒫 𝒫 (𝐴 ∪ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | altxpexg 36836 | The alternate Cartesian product of two sets is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | rankaltopb 36837 | Compute the rank of an alternate ordered pair. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → (rank‘⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫) = suc suc ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ suc (rank‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | nfaltop 36838 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ | ||
| Theorem | sbcaltop 36839* | Distribution of class substitution over alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ = ⟪⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷⟫) | ||
| Syntax | cofs 36840 | Declare the syntax for the outer five segment configuration. |
| class OuterFiveSeg | ||
| Definition | df-ofs 36841* | The outer five segment configuration is an abbreviation for the conditions of the Five Segment Axiom (ax5seg 29522). See brofs 36863 and 5segofs 36864 for how it is used. Definition 2.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ OuterFiveSeg = {〈𝑝, 𝑞〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑤 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = 〈〈𝑎, 𝑏〉, 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉〉 ∧ 𝑞 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉〉 ∧ ((𝑏 Btwn 〈𝑎, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝑦 Btwn 〈𝑥, 𝑧〉) ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝑦, 𝑧〉) ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑥, 𝑤〉 ∧ 〈𝑏, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑦, 𝑤〉)))} | ||
| Theorem | cgrrflx2d 36842 | Deduction form of axcgrrflx 29498. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐴〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr4d 36843 | Deduction form of axcgrtr 29499. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr4and 36844 | Deduction form of axcgrtr 29499. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrrflx 36845 | Reflexivity law for congruence. Theorem 2.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrrflxd 36846 | Deduction form of cgrrflx 36845. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomim 36847 | Congruence commutes on the two sides. Implication version. Theorem 2.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcom 36848 | Congruence commutes between the two sides. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomand 36849 | Deduction form of cgrcom 36848. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr 36850 | Transitivity law for congruence. Theorem 2.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtrand 36851 | Deduction form of cgrtr 36850. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr3 36852 | Transitivity law for congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr3and 36853 | Deduction form of cgrtr3 36852. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcoml 36854 | Congruence commutes on the left. Biconditional version of Theorem 2.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomr 36855 | Congruence commutes on the right. Biconditional version of Theorem 2.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐶〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomlr 36856 | Congruence commutes on both sides. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐶〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomland 36857 | Deduction form of cgrcoml 36854. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomrand 36858 | Deduction form of cgrcoml 36854. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐶〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomlrand 36859 | Deduction form of cgrcomlr 36856. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐶〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtriv 36860 | Degenerate segments are congruent. Theorem 2.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrid2 36861 | Identity law for congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrdegen 36862 | Two congruent segments are either both degenerate or both nondegenerate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | brofs 36863 | Binary relation form of the outer five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 OuterFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ↔ ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐹 Btwn 〈𝐸, 𝐺〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐹, 𝐺〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐻〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐹, 𝐻〉)))) | ||
| Theorem | 5segofs 36864 | Rephrase ax5seg 29522 using the outer five segment predicate. Theorem 2.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 OuterFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐺, 𝐻〉)) | ||
| Theorem | ofscom 36865 | The outer five segment predicate commutes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 OuterFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ↔ 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 OuterFiveSeg 〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrextend 36866 | Link congruence over a pair of line segments. Theorem 2.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 29. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝐹〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐹〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrextendand 36867 | Deduction form of cgrextend 36866. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝐹〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐸〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐹〉) | ||
| Theorem | segconeq 36868 | Two points that satisfy the conclusion of axsegcon 29511 are identical. Uniqueness portion of Theorem 2.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 29. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝑄 ≠ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝑄, 𝑋〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝑋〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) ∧ (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝑄, 𝑌〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝑌〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐶〉)) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | segconeu 36869* | Existential uniqueness version of segconeq 36868. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → ∃!𝑟 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑟〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑟〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwntriv2 36870 | Betweenness always holds for the second endpoint. Theorem 3.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwncomim 36871 | Betweenness commutes. Implication version. Theorem 3.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 → 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwncom 36872 | Betweenness commutes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwncomand 36873 | Deduction form of btwncom 36872. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwntriv1 36874 | Betweenness always holds for the first endpoint. Theorem 3.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwnswapid 36875 | If you can swap the first two arguments of a betweenness statement, then those arguments are identical. Theorem 3.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnswapid2 36876 | If you can swap arguments one and three of a betweenness statement, then those arguments are identical. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉) → 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnintr 36877 | Inner transitivity law for betweenness. Left-hand side of Theorem 3.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexch3 36878 | Exchange the first endpoint in betweenness. Left-hand side of Theorem 3.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexch3and 36879 | Deduction form of btwnexch3 36878. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwnouttr2 36880 | Outer transitivity law for betweenness. Left-hand side of Theorem 3.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexch2 36881 | Exchange the outer point of two betweenness statements. Right-hand side of Theorem 3.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnouttr 36882 | Outer transitivity law for betweenness. Right-hand side of Theorem 3.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexch 36883 | Outer transitivity law for betweenness. Right-hand side of Theorem 3.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexchand 36884 | Deduction form of btwnexch 36883. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwndiff 36885* | There is always a 𝑐 distinct from 𝐵 such that 𝐵 lies between 𝐴 and 𝑐. Theorem 3.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 32. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑐)) | ||
| Theorem | trisegint 36886* | A line segment between two sides of a triange intersects a segment crossing from the remaining side to the opposite vertex. Theorem 3.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 33. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝑃 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) → ∃𝑞 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑞 Btwn 〈𝑃, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝑞 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐸〉))) | ||
| Syntax | ctransport 36887 | Declare the syntax for the segment transport function. |
| class TransportTo | ||
| Definition | df-transport 36888* | Define the segment transport function. See fvtransport 36890 for an explanation of the function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ TransportTo = {〈〈𝑝, 𝑞〉, 𝑥〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑝 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ 𝑞 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ (1st ‘𝑞) ≠ (2nd ‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑥 = (℩𝑟 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)((2nd ‘𝑞) Btwn 〈(1st ‘𝑞), 𝑟〉 ∧ 〈(2nd ‘𝑞), 𝑟〉Cgr𝑝)))} | ||
| Theorem | funtransport 36889 | The TransportTo relationship is a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ Fun TransportTo | ||
| Theorem | fvtransport 36890* | Calculate the value of the TransportTo function. This function takes four points, 𝐴 through 𝐷, where 𝐶 and 𝐷 are distinct. It then returns the point that extends 𝐶𝐷 by the length of 𝐴𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 TransportTo 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) = (℩𝑟 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑟〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑟〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉))) | ||
| Theorem | transportcl 36891 | Closure law for segment transport. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 TransportTo 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | transportprops 36892 | Calculate the defining properties of the transport function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → (𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐶, (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 TransportTo 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 TransportTo 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Syntax | cifs 36893 | Declare the syntax for the inner five segment predicate. |
| class InnerFiveSeg | ||
| Syntax | ccgr3 36894 | Declare the syntax for the three place congruence predicate. |
| class Cgr3 | ||
| Syntax | ccolin 36895 | Declare the syntax for the colinearity predicate. |
| class Colinear | ||
| Syntax | cfs 36896 | Declare the syntax for the five segment predicate. |
| class FiveSeg | ||
| Definition | df-colinear 36897* | The colinearity predicate states that the three points in its arguments sit on one line. Definition 4.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ Colinear = ◡{〈〈𝑏, 𝑐〉, 𝑎〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ (𝑎 Btwn 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉 ∨ 𝑏 Btwn 〈𝑐, 𝑎〉 ∨ 𝑐 Btwn 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉))} | ||
| Definition | df-ifs 36898* | The inner five segment configuration is an abbreviation for another congruence condition. See brifs 36901 and ifscgr 36902 for how it is used. Definition 4.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ InnerFiveSeg = {〈𝑝, 𝑞〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑤 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = 〈〈𝑎, 𝑏〉, 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉〉 ∧ 𝑞 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉〉 ∧ ((𝑏 Btwn 〈𝑎, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝑦 Btwn 〈𝑥, 𝑧〉) ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 ∧ 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝑦, 𝑧〉) ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑥, 𝑤〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑧, 𝑤〉)))} | ||
| Definition | df-cgr3 36899* | The three place congruence predicate. This is an abbreviation for saying that all three pair in a triple are congruent with each other. Three place form of Definition 4.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ Cgr3 = {〈𝑝, 𝑞〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑒 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑓 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = 〈𝑎, 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉〉 ∧ 𝑞 = 〈𝑑, 〈𝑒, 𝑓〉〉 ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝑑, 𝑒〉 ∧ 〈𝑎, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝑑, 𝑓〉 ∧ 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝑒, 𝑓〉))} | ||
| Definition | df-fs 36900* | The general five segment configuration is a generalization of the outer and inner five segment configurations. See brfs 36937 and fscgr 36938 for its use. Definition 4.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ FiveSeg = {〈𝑝, 𝑞〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑤 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = 〈〈𝑎, 𝑏〉, 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉〉 ∧ 𝑞 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉〉 ∧ (𝑎 Colinear 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝑎, 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉〉Cgr3〈𝑥, 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉〉 ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑥, 𝑤〉 ∧ 〈𝑏, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑦, 𝑤〉)))} | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |