Theorem bnj1039 35168

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35207. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1039.1	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj1039.2	⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1039	⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Proof of Theorem bnj1039

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1039.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜓)
2		vex 3437	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑗 ∈ V
3		bnj1039.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
4		nfra1 3265	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
5	3, 4	nfxfr 1861	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖𝜓
6	2, 5	sbcgfi 3798	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜓 ↔ 𝜓)
7	1, 6, 3	3bitri 299	1 ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   = wceq 1548   ∈ wcel 2121  ∀wral 3055  [wsbc 3725  ∪ ciun 4924  suc csuc 6316  ‘cfv 6489  ωcom 7810   predc-bnj14 34886

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2123  ax-9 2131  ax-10 2154  ax-12 2191  ax-ext 2713

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-or 855  df-tru 1551  df-ex 1788  df-nf 1792  df-sb 2075  df-clab 2720  df-cleq 2733  df-clel 2816  df-ral 3056  df-v 3435  df-sbc 3726

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1128  35187