Theorem bnj1039 32664

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 32703. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1039.1	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj1039.2	⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1039	⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Proof of Theorem bnj1039

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1039.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜓)
2		vex 3412	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑗 ∈ V
3		bnj1039.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
4		nfra1 3140	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
5	3, 4	nfxfr 1860	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖𝜓
6	2, 5	sbcgfi 3776	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜓 ↔ 𝜓)
7	1, 6, 3	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1543   ∈ wcel 2110  ∀wral 3061  [wsbc 3694  ∪ ciun 4904  suc csuc 6215  ‘cfv 6380  ωcom 7644   predc-bnj14 32379

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1976  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 848  df-tru 1546  df-ex 1788  df-nf 1792  df-sb 2071  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-ral 3066  df-v 3410  df-sbc 3695

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1128  32683