P. 347 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 34601-34700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cvmlift2lem10 34601*	Lemma for cvmlift2 34605. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑧𝐺0)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1), 𝑦 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ ((℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑥)))‘𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (0[,]1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (0[,]1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑢 ∈ II ∃𝑣 ∈ II (𝑋 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑣 (𝐾 ↾ (𝑢 × {𝑤})) ∈ (((II ×t II) ↾t (𝑢 × {𝑤})) Cn 𝐶) → (𝐾 ↾ (𝑢 × 𝑣)) ∈ (((II ×t II) ↾t (𝑢 × 𝑣)) Cn 𝐶))))
Theorem	cvmlift2lem11 34602*	Lemma for cvmlift2 34605. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑧𝐺0)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1), 𝑦 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ ((℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑥)))‘𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑧 ∈ ((0[,]1) × (0[,]1)) ∣ 𝐾 ∈ (((II ×t II) CnP 𝐶)‘𝑧)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ II)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ II)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐾 ↾ (𝑈 × {𝑤})) ∈ (((II ×t II) ↾t (𝑈 × {𝑤})) Cn 𝐶) → (𝐾 ↾ (𝑈 × 𝑉)) ∈ (((II ×t II) ↾t (𝑈 × 𝑉)) Cn 𝐶)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑈 × {𝑌}) ⊆ 𝑀 → (𝑈 × {𝑍}) ⊆ 𝑀))
Theorem	cvmlift2lem12 34603*	Lemma for cvmlift2 34605. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑧𝐺0)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1), 𝑦 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ ((℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑥)))‘𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑧 ∈ ((0[,]1) × (0[,]1)) ∣ 𝐾 ∈ (((II ×t II) CnP 𝐶)‘𝑧)}    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑎 ∈ (0[,]1) ∣ ((0[,]1) × {𝑎}) ⊆ 𝑀}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑟, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ ((nei‘II)‘{𝑟})((𝑢 × {𝑎}) ⊆ 𝑀 ↔ (𝑢 × {𝑡}) ⊆ 𝑀))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐶))
Theorem	cvmlift2lem13 34604*	Lemma for cvmlift2 34605. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑧𝐺0)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1), 𝑦 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ ((℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑥)))‘𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑔 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = 𝐺 ∧ (0𝑔0) = 𝑃))
Theorem	cvmlift2 34605*	A two-dimensional version of cvmlift 34588. There is a unique lift of functions on the unit square II ×t II which commutes with the covering map. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (0𝑓0) = 𝑃))
Theorem	cvmliftphtlem 34606*	Lemma for cvmliftpht 34607. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐻 ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (II Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (II Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝐺(PHtpy‘𝐽)𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐴) = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0𝐴0) = 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑀(PHtpy‘𝐶)𝑁))
Theorem	cvmliftpht 34607*	If 𝐺 and 𝐻 are path-homotopic, then their lifts 𝑀 and 𝑁 are also path-homotopic. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐻 ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺( ≃ph‘𝐽)𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀( ≃ph‘𝐶)𝑁)
Theorem	cvmlift3lem1 34608*	Lemma for cvmlift3 34617. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘0) = 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘0) = 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘1) = (𝑁‘1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑀) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem2 34609*	Lemma for cvmlift2 34605. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑌) → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑋 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem3 34610*	Lemma for cvmlift2 34605. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑌⟶𝐵)
Theorem	cvmlift3lem4 34611*	Lemma for cvmlift2 34605. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑌) → ((𝐻‘𝑋) = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑋 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝐴)))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem5 34612*	Lemma for cvmlift2 34605. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) = 𝐺)
Theorem	cvmlift3lem6 34613*	Lemma for cvmlift3 34617. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑆‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝑇 (𝐻‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑏)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑄‘1) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑅‘1) = (𝐻‘𝑋)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (II Cn (𝐾 ↾t 𝑀)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑁‘1) = 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑋)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑍) ∈ 𝑊)
Theorem	cvmlift3lem7 34614*	Lemma for cvmlift3 34617. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑆‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝑇 (𝐻‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑏)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ↾t 𝑀) ∈ PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ((𝐾 CnP 𝐶)‘𝑋))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem8 34615*	Lemma for cvmlift2 34605. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐶))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem9 34616*	Lemma for cvmlift2 34605. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑂) = 𝑃))
Theorem	cvmlift3 34617*	A general version of cvmlift 34588. If 𝐾 is simply connected and weakly locally path-connected, then there is a unique lift of functions on 𝐾 which commutes with the covering map. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑂) = 𝑃))
21.6.9  Normal numbers
Theorem	snmlff 34618*	The function 𝐹 from snmlval 34620 is a mapping from positive integers to real numbers in the range [0, 1]. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝐵}) / 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:ℕ⟶(0[,]1)
Theorem	snmlfval 34619*	The function 𝐹 from snmlval 34620 maps 𝑁 to the relative density of 𝐵 in the first 𝑁 digits of the digit string of 𝐴 in base 𝑅. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝐵}) / 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝑁) = ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝐵}) / 𝑁))
Theorem	snmlval 34620*	The property "𝐴 is simply normal in base 𝑅". A number is simply normal if each digit 0 ≤ 𝑏 < 𝑅 occurs in the base- 𝑅 digit string of 𝐴 with frequency 1 / 𝑅 (which is consistent with the expectation in an infinite random string of numbers selected from 0...𝑅 − 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑟 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ (0...(𝑟 − 1))(𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝑥 · (𝑟↑𝑘)) mod 𝑟)) = 𝑏}) / 𝑛)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑟)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑅 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ (0...(𝑅 − 1))(𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝑏}) / 𝑛)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑅)))
Theorem	snmlflim 34621*	If 𝐴 is simply normal, then the function 𝐹 of relative density of 𝐵 in the digit string converges to 1 / 𝑅, i.e. the set of occurrences of 𝐵 in the digit string has natural density 1 / 𝑅. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑟 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ (0...(𝑟 − 1))(𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝑥 · (𝑟↑𝑘)) mod 𝑟)) = 𝑏}) / 𝑛)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑟)})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝐵}) / 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑅) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0...(𝑅 − 1))) → 𝐹 ⇝ (1 / 𝑅))
21.6.10  Godel-sets of formulas - part 1
Syntax	cgoe 34622	The Godel-set of membership.
class ∈𝑔
Syntax	cgna 34623	The Godel-set for the Sheffer stroke.
class ⊼𝑔
Syntax	cgol 34624	The Godel-set of universal quantification. (Note that this is not a wff.)
class ∀𝑔𝑁𝑈
Syntax	csat 34625	The satisfaction function.
class Sat
Syntax	cfmla 34626	The formula set predicate.
class Fmla
Syntax	csate 34627	The ∈-satisfaction function.
class Sat∈
Syntax	cprv 34628	The "proves" relation.
class ⊧
Definition	df-goel 34629	Define the Godel-set of membership. Here the arguments 𝑥 = ⟨𝑁, 𝑃⟩ correspond to vN and vP , so (∅∈𝑔1o) actually means v0 ∈ v1 , not 0 ∈ 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ∈𝑔 = (𝑥 ∈ (ω × ω) ↦ ⟨∅, 𝑥⟩)
Definition	df-gona 34630	Define the Godel-set for the Sheffer stroke NAND. Here the arguments 𝑥 = ⟨𝑈, 𝑉⟩ are also Godel-sets corresponding to smaller formulas. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ⊼𝑔 = (𝑥 ∈ (V × V) ↦ ⟨1o, 𝑥⟩)
Definition	df-goal 34631	Define the Godel-set of universal quantification. Here 𝑁 ∈ ω corresponds to vN , and 𝑈 represents another formula, and this expression is [∀𝑥𝜑] = ∀𝑔𝑁𝑈 where 𝑥 is the 𝑁-th variable, 𝑈 = [𝜑] is the code for 𝜑. Note that this is a class expression, not a wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ∀𝑔𝑁𝑈 = ⟨2o, ⟨𝑁, 𝑈⟩⟩
Definition	df-sat 34632*	Define the satisfaction predicate. This recursive construction builds up a function over wff codes (see satff 34699) and simultaneously defines the set of assignments to all variables from 𝑀 that makes the coded wff true in the model 𝑀, where ∈ is interpreted as the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀. The interpretation of the statement 𝑆 ∈ (((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛)‘𝑈) is that for the model ⟨𝑀, 𝐸⟩, 𝑆:ω⟶𝑀 is a valuation of the variables (v0 = (𝑆‘∅), v1 = (𝑆‘1o), etc.) and 𝑈 is a code for a wff using ∈ , ⊼ , ∀ that is true under the assignment 𝑆. The function is defined by finite recursion; ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) only operates on wffs of depth at most 𝑛 ∈ ω, and ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘ω) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) operates on all wffs. The coding scheme for the wffs is defined so that vi ∈ vj is coded as ⟨∅, ⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩⟩, (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) is coded as ⟨1o, ⟨𝜑, 𝜓⟩⟩, and ∀ vi 𝜑 is coded as ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝜑⟩⟩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ Sat = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑚 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑚 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑚 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑚 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝑒(𝑎‘𝑗)})}) ↾ suc ω))
Definition	df-sate 34633*	A simplified version of the satisfaction predicate, using the standard membership relation and eliminating the extra variable 𝑛. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ Sat∈ = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢))
Definition	df-fmla 34634	Define the predicate which defines the set of valid Godel formulas. The parameter 𝑛 defines the maximum height of the formulas: the set (Fmla‘∅) is all formulas of the form 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (which in our coding scheme is the set ({∅} × (ω × ω)); see df-sat 34632 for the full coding scheme), see fmla0 34671, and each extra level adds to the complexity of the formulas in (Fmla‘𝑛), see fmlasuc 34675. Remark: it is sufficient to have atomic formulas of the form 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 only, because equations (formulas of the form 𝑥 = 𝑦), which are required as (atomic) formulas, can be introduced as a defined notion in terms of ∈𝑔, see df-goeq 34733. (Fmla‘ω) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω(Fmla‘𝑛) is the set of all valid formulas, see fmla 34670. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ Fmla = (𝑛 ∈ suc ω ↦ dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛))
Definition	df-prv 34635*	Define the "proves" relation on a set. A wff is true in a model 𝑀 if for every valuation 𝑠 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω), the interpretation of the wff using the membership relation on 𝑀 is true. Since ⊧ is defined in terms of the interpretations making the given formula true, it is not defined on the empty "model" 𝑀 = ∅, since there are no interpretations. In particular, the empty set on the LHS of ⊧ should not be interpreted as the empty model. Statement prv0 34719 shows that our definition yields ∅⊧𝑈 for all formulas, though of course the formula ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑥 is not satisfied on the empty model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ⊧ = {⟨𝑚, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑚 Sat∈ 𝑢) = (𝑚 ↑m ω)}
Theorem	goel 34636	A "Godel-set of membership". The variables are identified by their indices (which are natural numbers), and the membership vi ∈ vj is coded as ⟨∅, ⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩⟩. (Contributed by AV, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼∈𝑔𝐽) = ⟨∅, ⟨𝐼, 𝐽⟩⟩)
Theorem	goelel3xp 34637	A "Godel-set of membership" is a member of a doubled Cartesian product. (Contributed by AV, 16-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼∈𝑔𝐽) ∈ (ω × (ω × ω)))
Theorem	goeleq12bg 34638	Two "Godel-set of membership" codes for two variables are equal iff the two corresponding variables are equal. (Contributed by AV, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω)) → ((𝐼∈𝑔𝐽) = (𝑀∈𝑔𝑁) ↔ (𝐼 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝐽 = 𝑁)))
Theorem	gonafv 34639	The "Godel-set for the Sheffer stroke NAND" for two formulas 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by AV, 16-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴⊼𝑔𝐵) = ⟨1o, ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩⟩)
Theorem	goaleq12d 34640	Equality of the "Godel-set of universal quantification". (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑔𝑀𝐴 = ∀𝑔𝑁𝐵)
Theorem	gonanegoal 34641	The Godel-set for the Sheffer stroke NAND is not equal to the Godel-set of universal quantification. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) ≠ ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢
Theorem	satf 34642*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat 𝐸) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)})}) ↾ suc ω))
Theorem	satfsucom 34643*	The satisfaction predicate for wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 at an element of the successor of ω. (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ suc ω) → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)})})‘𝑁))
Theorem	satfn 34644	The satisfaction predicate for wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 is a function over suc ω. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat 𝐸) Fn suc ω)
Theorem	satom 34645*	The satisfaction predicate for wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 at omega (ω). (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘ω) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛))
Theorem	satfvsucom 34646*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a successor of ω. (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ suc ω) → (𝑆‘𝑁) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)})})‘𝑁))
Theorem	satfv0 34647*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at ∅. (Contributed by AV, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆‘∅) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)})})
Theorem	satfvsuclem1 34648*	Lemma 1 for satfvsuc 34650. (Contributed by AV, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)})) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑀 ↑m ω))} ∈ V)
Theorem	satfvsuclem2 34649*	Lemma 2 for satfvsuc 34650. (Contributed by AV, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))} ∈ V)
Theorem	satfvsuc 34650*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 10-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (𝑆‘suc 𝑁) = ((𝑆‘𝑁) ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))}))
Theorem	satfv1lem 34651*	Lemma for satfv1 34652. (Contributed by AV, 9-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑁, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑁}))) ∈ {𝑏 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑏‘𝐼)𝐸(𝑏‘𝐽)}} = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 if-(𝐼 = 𝑁, if-(𝐽 = 𝑁, 𝑧𝐸𝑧, 𝑧𝐸(𝑎‘𝐽)), if-(𝐽 = 𝑁, (𝑎‘𝐼)𝐸𝑧, (𝑎‘𝐼)𝐸(𝑎‘𝐽)))})
Theorem	satfv1 34652*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes of height 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆‘1o) = ((𝑆‘∅) ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑙 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ((𝑖∈𝑔𝑗)⊼𝑔(𝑘∈𝑔𝑙)) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (¬ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗) ∨ ¬ (𝑎‘𝑘)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑙))}) ∨ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑛(𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 if-(𝑖 = 𝑛, if-(𝑗 = 𝑛, 𝑧𝐸𝑧, 𝑧𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)), if-(𝑗 = 𝑛, (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸𝑧, (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)))}))}))
Theorem	satfsschain 34653	The binary relation of a satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes is an increasing chain (with respect to inclusion). (Contributed by AV, 15-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω)) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑆‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝑆‘𝐴)))
Theorem	satfvsucsuc 34654*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes of height (𝑁 + 1), expressed by the minimally necessary satisfaction predicates as function over wff codes of height 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (𝑆‘suc suc 𝑁) = ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴))}))
Theorem	satfbrsuc 34655*	The binary relation of a satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑆‘𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌)) → (𝐴(𝑆‘suc 𝑁)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑃𝐵 ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝐵 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝐴 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑓 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)})))))
Theorem	satfrel 34656	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a natural number is a relation. (Contributed by AV, 12-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → Rel ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁))
Theorem	satfdmlem 34657*	Lemma for satfdm 34658. (Contributed by AV, 12-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ω) ∧ dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑌) = dom ((𝑁 Sat 𝐹)‘𝑌)) → (∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑌)(∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑌)𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢)) → ∃𝑎 ∈ ((𝑁 Sat 𝐹)‘𝑌)(∃𝑏 ∈ ((𝑁 Sat 𝐹)‘𝑌)𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑎)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑏)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑎))))
Theorem	satfdm 34658*	The domain of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes does not depend on the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑌)) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((𝑁 Sat 𝐹)‘𝑛))
Theorem	satfrnmapom 34659	The range of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in any model 𝑀 and any binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 for a natural number 𝑁 is a subset of the power set of all mappings from the natural numbers into the model 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → ran ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) ⊆ 𝒫 (𝑀 ↑m ω))
Theorem	satfv0fun 34660	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at ∅ is a function. (Contributed by AV, 15-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘∅))
Theorem	satf0 34661*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (∅ Sat ∅) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢)))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗))}) ↾ suc ω)
Theorem	satf0sucom 34662*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation at a successor of ω. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ suc ω → ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢)))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗))})‘𝑁))
Theorem	satf00 34663*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation at ∅. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘∅) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗))}
Theorem	satf0suclem 34664*	Lemma for satf0suc 34665, sat1el2xp 34668 and fmlasuc0 34673. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 𝑥 = 𝐵 ∨ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑍 𝑥 = 𝐶))} ∈ V)
Theorem	satf0suc 34665*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model and the empty binary relation at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (∅ Sat ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝑆‘suc 𝑁) = ((𝑆‘𝑁) ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢)))}))
Theorem	satf0op 34666*	An element of a value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model and the empty binary relation expressed as ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (∅ Sat ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑋 = ⟨𝑥, ∅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑥, ∅⟩ ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁))))
Theorem	satf0n0 34667	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model and the empty binary relation does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ∅ ∉ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
Theorem	sat1el2xp 34668*	The first component of an element of the value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation is a member of a doubled Cartesian product. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ∀𝑤 ∈ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)∃𝑎∃𝑏(1st ‘𝑤) ∈ (ω × (𝑎 × 𝑏)))
Theorem	fmlafv 34669	The valid Godel formulas of height 𝑁 is the domain of the value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation at 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ suc ω → (Fmla‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
Theorem	fmla 34670	The set of all valid Godel formulas. (Contributed by AV, 20-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (Fmla‘ω) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω (Fmla‘𝑛)
Theorem	fmla0 34671*	The valid Godel formulas of height 0 is the set of all formulas of the form vi ∈ vj ("Godel-set of membership") coded as ⟨∅, ⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩⟩. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (Fmla‘∅) = {𝑥 ∈ V ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗)}
Theorem	fmla0xp 34672	The valid Godel formulas of height 0 is the set of all formulas of the form vi ∈ vj ("Godel-set of membership") coded as ⟨∅, ⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩⟩. (Contributed by AV, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (Fmla‘∅) = ({∅} × (ω × ω))
Theorem	fmlasuc0 34673*	The valid Godel formulas of height (𝑁 + 1). (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) = ((Fmla‘𝑁) ∪ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢))}))
Theorem	fmlafvel 34674	A class is a valid Godel formula of height 𝑁 iff it is the first component of a member of the value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation at 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝐹 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) ↔ ⟨𝐹, ∅⟩ ∈ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	fmlasuc 34675*	The valid Godel formulas of height (𝑁 + 1), expressed by the valid Godel formulas of height 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 20-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) = ((Fmla‘𝑁) ∪ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)𝑥 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢)}))
Theorem	fmla1 34676*	The valid Godel formulas of height 1 is the set of all formulas of the form (𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) and ∀𝑔𝑘𝑎 with atoms 𝑎, 𝑏 of the form 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦. (Contributed by AV, 20-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (Fmla‘1o) = (({∅} × (ω × ω)) ∪ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω (∃𝑙 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ((𝑖∈𝑔𝑗)⊼𝑔(𝑘∈𝑔𝑙)) ∨ 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑘(𝑖∈𝑔𝑗))})
Theorem	isfmlasuc 34677*	The characterization of a Godel formula of height at least 1. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)𝐹 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝐹 = ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢))))
Theorem	fmlasssuc 34678	The Godel formulas of height 𝑁 are a subset of the Godel formulas of height 𝑁 + 1. (Contributed by AV, 20-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (Fmla‘𝑁) ⊆ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁))
Theorem	fmlaomn0 34679	The empty set is not a Godel formula of any height. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ∅ ∉ (Fmla‘𝑁))
Theorem	fmlan0 34680	The empty set is not a Godel formula. (Contributed by AV, 19-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ∅ ∉ (Fmla‘ω)
Theorem	gonan0 34681	The "Godel-set of NAND" is a Godel formula of at least height 1. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴⊼𝑔𝐵) ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	goaln0 34682*	The "Godel-set of universal quantification" is a Godel formula of at least height 1. (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	gonarlem 34683*	Lemma for gonar 34684 (induction step). (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (((𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) → (𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁))) → ((𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁) → (𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁)))))
Theorem	gonar 34684*	If the "Godel-set of NAND" applied to classes is a Godel formula, the classes are also Godel formulas. Remark: The reverse is not valid for 𝐴 or 𝐵 being of the same height as the "Godel-set of NAND". (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)) → (𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)))
Theorem	goalrlem 34685*	Lemma for goalr 34686 (induction step). (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ((∀𝑔𝑖𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) → 𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁)) → (∀𝑔𝑖𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁) → 𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁))))
Theorem	goalr 34686*	If the "Godel-set of universal quantification" applied to a class is a Godel formula, the class is also a Godel formula. Remark: The reverse is not valid for 𝐴 being of the same height as the "Godel-set of universal quantification". (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ ∀𝑔𝑖𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)) → 𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁))
Theorem	fmla0disjsuc 34687*	The set of valid Godel formulas of height 0 is disjoint with the formulas constructed from Godel-sets for the Sheffer stroke NAND and Godel-set of universal quantification. (Contributed by AV, 20-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fmla‘∅) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)(∃𝑣 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)𝑥 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢)}) = ∅
Theorem	fmlasucdisj 34688*	The valid Godel formulas of height (𝑁 + 1) is disjoint with the difference ((Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁) ∖ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁)), expressed by formulas constructed from Godel-sets for the Sheffer stroke NAND and Godel-set of universal quantification based on the valid Godel formulas of height (𝑁 + 1). (Contributed by AV, 20-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ((Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ ((Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (Fmla‘𝑁))(∃𝑣 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁)𝑥 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)∃𝑣 ∈ ((Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (Fmla‘𝑁))𝑥 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣))}) = ∅)
Theorem	satfdmfmla 34689	The domain of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in any model 𝑀 and any binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 for a natural number 𝑁 is the set of valid Godel formulas of height 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘𝑁))
Theorem	satffunlem 34690	Lemma for satffunlem1lem1 34691 and satffunlem2lem1 34693. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((Fun 𝑍 ∧ (𝑠 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑍)) ∧ (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑠)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑟)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑠) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑟)))) ∧ (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑤 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣))))) → 𝑦 = 𝑤)
Theorem	satffunlem1lem1 34691*	Lemma for satffunlem1 34696. (Contributed by AV, 17-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) → Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑓 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑘⟩} ∪ (𝑓 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})
Theorem	satffunlem1lem2 34692*	Lemma 2 for satffunlem1 34696. (Contributed by AV, 23-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘∅) ∩ dom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘∅)(∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘∅)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑓 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩} ∪ (𝑓 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))}) = ∅)
Theorem	satffunlem2lem1 34693*	Lemma 1 for satffunlem2 34697. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((Fun (𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∧ (𝑆‘𝑁) ⊆ (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)) → Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴))})
Theorem	dmopab3rexdif 34694*	The domain of an ordered pair class abstraction with three nested restricted existential quantifiers with differences. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑈 (∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑈) → dom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ 𝑆)(∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐷)) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ 𝑆)(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))} = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ 𝑆)(∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 𝑥 = 𝐶) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ 𝑆)𝑥 = 𝐴)})
Theorem	satffunlem2lem2 34695*	Lemma 2 for satffunlem2 34697. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)) ∧ Fun (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)) → (dom (𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∩ dom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴))}) = ∅)
Theorem	satffunlem1 34696	Lemma 1 for satffun 34698: induction basis. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘suc ∅))
Theorem	satffunlem2 34697	Lemma 2 for satffun 34698: induction step. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)) → (Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘suc 𝑁) → Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘suc suc 𝑁)))
Theorem	satffun 34698	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a natural number is a function. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁))
Theorem	satff 34699	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁):(Fmla‘𝑁)⟶𝒫 (𝑀 ↑m ω))
Theorem	satfun 34700	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘ω):(Fmla‘ω)⟶𝒫 (𝑀 ↑m ω))