| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 440 of 503) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30989) |
(30990-32512) |
(32513-50280) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | ifpbiidcor 43901 | Restatement of biid 261. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ifpbicor 43902 | Corollary of commutation of biconditional. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpxorcor 43903 | Corollary of commutation of biconditional. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜑, 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpbi1 43904 | Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpnot23 43905 | Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpnotnotb 43906 | Factor conditional logic operator over negation in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpnorcor 43907 | Corollary of commutation of nor. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜑, ¬ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpnancor 43908 | Corollary of commutation of and. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜑, ¬ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpnot23b 43909 | Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpbiidcor2 43910 | Restatement of biid 261. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜑, 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ifpnot23c 43911 | Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpnot23d 43912 | Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpdfnan 43913 | Define nand as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ⊤)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpdfxor 43914 | Define xor as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpbi12 43915 | Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpbi13 43916 | Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜏, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜏, 𝜃))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpbi123 43917 | Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpidg 43918 | Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜃 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓)) ∧ ((𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜃)) ∧ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒))))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpid3g 43919 | Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpid2g 43920 | Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜓 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)) ∧ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpid1g 43921 | Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜒 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpim23g 43922 | Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpim3 43923 | Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpnim1 43924 | Restate negated implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpim4 43925 | Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpnim2 43926 | Restate negated implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpim123g 43927 | Implication of conditional logical operators. The right hand side is basically conjunctive normal form which is useful in proofs. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)) ↔ ((((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 → 𝜃))) ∧ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜂)) ∧ ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpim1g 43928 | Implication of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)) ↔ (((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜃 → 𝜒)) ∧ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃)))) | ||
| Theorem | ifp1bi 43929 | Substitute the first element of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)) ↔ ((((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜃 → 𝜒))) ∧ (((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜃 → 𝜒))))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpbi1b 43930 | When the first variable is irrelevant, it can be replaced. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | ifpimimb 43931 | Factor conditional logic operator over implication in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 → 𝜒), (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpororb 43932 | Factor conditional logic operator over disjunction in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒), (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ∨ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpananb 43933 | Factor conditional logic operator over conjunction in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒), (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ∧ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpnannanb 43934 | Factor conditional logic operator over nand in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒), (𝜃 ⊼ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ⊼ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpor123g 43935 | Disjunction of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ∨ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)) ↔ ((((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 ∨ 𝜃))) ∧ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜂)) ∧ ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 ∨ 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpimim 43936 | Consequnce of implication. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 → 𝜒), (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpbibib 43937 | Factor conditional logic operator over biconditional in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒), (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | ifpxorxorb 43938 | Factor conditional logic operator over xor in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒), (𝜃 ⊻ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ⊻ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | rp-fakeimass 43939 | A special case where implication appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 29-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))) | ||
| Theorem | rp-fakeanorass 43940 | A special case where a mixture of and and or appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 26-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜒 → 𝜑) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))) | ||
| Theorem | rp-fakeoranass 43941 | A special case where a mixture of or and and appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 29-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))) | ||
| Theorem | rp-fakeinunass 43942 | A special case where a mixture of intersection and union appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 26-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | rp-fakeuninass 43943 | A special case where a mixture of union and intersection appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 29-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))) | ||
Membership in the class of finite sets can be expressed in many ways. | ||
| Theorem | rp-isfinite5 43944* | A set is said to be finite if it can be put in one-to-one correspondence with all the natural numbers between 1 and some 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0. (Contributed by RP, 3-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (1...𝑛) ≈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | rp-isfinite6 43945* | A set is said to be finite if it is either empty or it can be put in one-to-one correspondence with all the natural numbers between 1 and some 𝑛 ∈ ℕ. (Contributed by RP, 10-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ (1...𝑛) ≈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | intabssd 43946* | When for each element 𝑦 there is a subset 𝐴 which may substituted for 𝑥 such that 𝑦 satisfying 𝜒 implies 𝑥 satisfies 𝜓 then the intersection of all 𝑥 that satisfy 𝜓 is a subclass the intersection of all 𝑦 that satisfy 𝜒. (Contributed by RP, 17-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ ∩ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | eu0 43947* | There is only one empty set. (Contributed by RP, 1-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ ∃!𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | epelon2 43948 | Over the ordinal numbers, one may define the relation 𝐴 E 𝐵 iff 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 and one finds that, under this ordering, On is a well-ordered class, see epweon 7729. This is a weak form of epelg 5532 which only requires that we know 𝐵 to be a set. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 E 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ontric3g 43949* | For all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ On, one and only one of the following hold: 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦, 𝑦 = 𝑥, or 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥. This is a transparent strict trichotomy. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ¬ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) ∧ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | dfsucon 43950* | 𝐴 is called a successor ordinal if it is not a limit ordinal and not the empty set. (Contributed by RP, 11-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | snen1g 43951 | A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one iff its content is a set. (Contributed by RP, 8-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ({𝐴} ≈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | snen1el 43952 | A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one if its content is an element of it. (Contributed by RP, 8-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ({𝐴} ≈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | sn1dom 43953 | A singleton is dominated by ordinal one. (Contributed by RP, 29-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴} ≼ 1o | ||
| Theorem | pr2dom 43954 | An unordered pair is dominated by ordinal two. (Contributed by RP, 29-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} ≼ 2o | ||
| Theorem | tr3dom 43955 | An unordered triple is dominated by ordinal three. (Contributed by RP, 29-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ≼ 3o | ||
| Theorem | ensucne0 43956 | A class equinumerous to a successor is never empty. (Contributed by RP, 11-Nov-2023.) (Proof shortened by SN, 16-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ensucne0OLD 43957 | A class equinumerous to a successor is never empty. (Contributed by RP, 11-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | dfom6 43958 | Let ω be defined to be the union of the set of all finite ordinals. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ ω = ∪ (On ∩ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | infordmin 43959 | ω is the smallest infinite ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ Fin)ω ⊆ 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | iscard4 43960 | Two ways to express the property of being a cardinal number. (Contributed by RP, 8-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((card‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ran card) | ||
| Theorem | minregex 43961* | Given any cardinal number 𝐴, there exists an argument 𝑥, which yields the least regular uncountable value of ℵ which is greater to or equal to 𝐴. This proof uses AC. (Contributed by RP, 23-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ran card ∖ ω) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑥 = ∩ {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ (∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝑦) ∧ (cf‘(ℵ‘𝑦)) = (ℵ‘𝑦))}) | ||
| Theorem | minregex2 43962* | Given any cardinal number 𝐴, there exists an argument 𝑥, which yields the least regular uncountable value of ℵ which dominates 𝐴. This proof uses AC. (Contributed by RP, 24-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ran card ∖ ω) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑥 = ∩ {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ (∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ (ℵ‘𝑦) ∧ (cf‘(ℵ‘𝑦)) = (ℵ‘𝑦))}) | ||
| Theorem | iscard5 43963* | Two ways to express the property of being a cardinal number. (Contributed by RP, 8-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((card‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | elrncard 43964* | Let us define a cardinal number to be an element 𝐴 ∈ On such that 𝐴 is not equipotent with any 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 1-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran card ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | harval3 43965* | (har‘𝐴) is the least cardinal that is greater than 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 4-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (har‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ ran card ∣ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | harval3on 43966* | For any ordinal number 𝐴 let (har‘𝐴) denote the least cardinal that is greater than 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 4-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (har‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ ran card ∣ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | omssrncard 43967 | All natural numbers are cardinals. (Contributed by RP, 1-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ω ⊆ ran card | ||
| Theorem | 0iscard 43968 | 0 is a cardinal number. (Contributed by RP, 1-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ∅ ∈ ran card | ||
| Theorem | 1iscard 43969 | 1 is a cardinal number. (Contributed by RP, 1-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ 1o ∈ ran card | ||
| Theorem | omiscard 43970 | ω is a cardinal number. (Contributed by RP, 1-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ω ∈ ran card | ||
| Theorem | sucomisnotcard 43971 | ω +o 1o is not a cardinal number. (Contributed by RP, 1-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ¬ (ω +o 1o) ∈ ran card | ||
| Theorem | nna1iscard 43972 | For any natural number, the add one operation is results in a cardinal number. (Contributed by RP, 1-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝑁 +o 1o) ∈ ran card) | ||
| Theorem | har2o 43973 | The least cardinal greater than 2 is 3. (Contributed by RP, 5-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ (har‘2o) = 3o | ||
| Theorem | en2pr 43974* | A class is equinumerous to ordinal two iff it is a pair of distinct sets. (Contributed by RP, 11-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 2o ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | pr2cv 43975 | If an unordered pair is equinumerous to ordinal two, then both parts are sets. (Contributed by RP, 8-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | pr2el1 43976 | If an unordered pair is equinumerous to ordinal two, then a part is a member. (Contributed by RP, 21-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | pr2cv1 43977 | If an unordered pair is equinumerous to ordinal two, then a part is a set. (Contributed by RP, 21-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | pr2el2 43978 | If an unordered pair is equinumerous to ordinal two, then a part is a member. (Contributed by RP, 21-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o → 𝐵 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | pr2cv2 43979 | If an unordered pair is equinumerous to ordinal two, then a part is a set. (Contributed by RP, 21-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o → 𝐵 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | pren2 43980 | An unordered pair is equinumerous to ordinal two iff both parts are sets not equal to each other. (Contributed by RP, 8-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | pr2eldif1 43981 | If an unordered pair is equinumerous to ordinal two, then a part is an element of the difference of the pair and the singleton of the other part. (Contributed by RP, 21-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o → 𝐴 ∈ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∖ {𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | pr2eldif2 43982 | If an unordered pair is equinumerous to ordinal two, then a part is an element of the difference of the pair and the singleton of the other part. (Contributed by RP, 21-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o → 𝐵 ∈ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∖ {𝐴})) | ||
| Theorem | pren2d 43983 | A pair of two distinct sets is equinumerous to ordinal two. (Contributed by RP, 21-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o) | ||
| Theorem | aleph1min 43984 | (ℵ‘1o) is the least uncountable ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 18-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ (ℵ‘1o) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ω ≺ 𝑥} | ||
| Theorem | alephiso2 43985 | ℵ is a strictly order-preserving mapping of On onto the class of all infinite cardinal numbers. (Contributed by RP, 18-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℵ Isom E , ≺ (On, {𝑥 ∈ ran card ∣ ω ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | alephiso3 43986 | ℵ is a strictly order-preserving mapping of On onto the class of all infinite cardinal numbers. (Contributed by RP, 18-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℵ Isom E , ≺ (On, (ran card ∖ ω)) | ||
| Theorem | pwelg 43987* | The powerclass is an element of a class closed under union and powerclass operations iff the element is a member of that class. (Contributed by RP, 21-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | pwinfig 43988* | The powerclass of an infinite set is an infinite set, and vice-versa. Here 𝐵 is a class which is closed under both the union and the powerclass operations and which may have infinite sets as members. (Contributed by RP, 21-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ Fin) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ Fin))) | ||
| Theorem | pwinfi2 43989 | The powerclass of an infinite set is an infinite set, and vice-versa. Here 𝑈 is a weak universe. (Contributed by RP, 21-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ WUni → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ Fin) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ Fin))) | ||
| Theorem | pwinfi3 43990 | The powerclass of an infinite set is an infinite set, and vice-versa. Here 𝑇 is a transitive Tarski universe. (Contributed by RP, 21-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ Tr 𝑇) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑇 ∖ Fin) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑇 ∖ Fin))) | ||
| Theorem | pwinfi 43991 | The powerclass of an infinite set is an infinite set, and vice-versa. (Contributed by RP, 21-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V ∖ Fin) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (V ∖ Fin)) | ||
While there is not yet a definition, the finite intersection property of a class is introduced by fiint 9237 where two textbook definitions are shown to be equivalent. This property is seen often with ordinal numbers (onin 6354, ordelinel 6426), chains of sets ordered by the proper subset relation (sorpssin 7685), various sets in the field of topology (inopn 22864, incld 23008, innei 23090, ... ) and "universal" classes like weak universes (wunin 10636, tskin 10682) and the class of all sets (inex1g 5260). | ||
| Theorem | fipjust 43992* | A definition of the finite intersection property of a class based on closure under pairwise intersection of its elements is independent of the dummy variables. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | cllem0 43993* | The class of all sets with property 𝜑(𝑧) is closed under the binary operation on sets defined in 𝑅(𝑥, 𝑦). (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑅 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 | ||
| Theorem | superficl 43994* | The class of all supersets of a class has the finite intersection property. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by RP, 3-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑧} ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | superuncl 43995* | The class of all supersets of a class is closed under binary union. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑧} ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ssficl 43996* | The class of all subsets of a class has the finite intersection property. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by RP, 3-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐵} ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ssuncl 43997* | The class of all subsets of a class is closed under binary union. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐵} ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ssdifcl 43998* | The class of all subsets of a class is closed under class difference. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐵} ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∖ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | sssymdifcl 43999* | The class of all subsets of a class is closed under symmetric difference. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐵} ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥 ∖ 𝑦) ∪ (𝑦 ∖ 𝑥)) ∈ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | fiinfi 44000* | If two classes have the finite intersection property, then so does their intersection. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |